| ... |
... |
@@ -1,11
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-====Issue of the united states- question of policymakers not individuals.==== |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-====A) People psychologically agree– governments are obligated to use it since it’s more justifiable for citizens==== |
| 5 |
|
-**Gino et al 2008 ~~Francesca Gino Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Don Moore Tepper Business School, Carnegie Mellon University, Max H. Bozman Harvard Business School, Harvard University "No harm, no foul: The outcome bias in ethical judgments" http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/08-080.pdf~~ ** |
| 6 |
|
-The present studies provide strong evidence of the existence of outcome effects in ethically- |
| 7 |
|
-AND |
| 8 |
|
-standard of data sets- consensus of studies mean ends justify the means. |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-====B) Government actions will inevitably lead to trade-offs between citizens since they benefit some and harm others; the only justifiable way to resolve these conflicts is by benefitting the maximum possible number of people since anything else would unequally prioritize one group over another. ==== |