| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,11 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Issue of the united states- question of policymakers not individuals.==== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+====A) People psychologically agree– governments are obligated to use it since it’s more justifiable for citizens==== |
|
5 |
+**Gino et al 2008 ~~Francesca Gino Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Don Moore Tepper Business School, Carnegie Mellon University, Max H. Bozman Harvard Business School, Harvard University "No harm, no foul: The outcome bias in ethical judgments" http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/08-080.pdf~~ ** |
|
6 |
+The present studies provide strong evidence of the existence of outcome effects in ethically- |
|
7 |
+AND |
|
8 |
+standard of data sets- consensus of studies mean ends justify the means. |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+====B) Government actions will inevitably lead to trade-offs between citizens since they benefit some and harm others; the only justifiable way to resolve these conflicts is by benefitting the maximum possible number of people since anything else would unequally prioritize one group over another. ==== |