Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[5]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[8]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[5]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-10-15 13:45:53.908
	1	+2016-10-15 13:45:53.0

Caselist.CitesClass[8]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,48 @@
	1	+=1NC v Evanston=
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+==Framework==
	5	+The 1AC fails to advance an instrumental defense of the federal government substantially doing something
	6	+Resolved is used to introduce a policy resolution—limited to only the exact immediate question of the resolution
	7	+Robert 15 ,,General Henry M. Robert, US Army, 1915, http://www.bartleby.com/176/4.html,,
	8	+A motion is a proposal that the assembly take certain action, or that it express itself as holding certain views. It is made by a member's obtaining the floor as already described and saying, "I move that" (which is equivalent to saying, "I propose that"), and then stating the action he proposes to have taken. Thus a member "moves" (proposes) that a resolution be adopted, or amended, or referred to a committee, or that a vote of thanks be extended, etc.; or "That it is the sense of this meeting (or assembly) that industrial training," etc. Every resolution should be in writing, and the presiding officer has a right to require any main motion, amendment, or instructions to a committee to be in writing. When a main motion is of such importance or length as to be in writing it is usually written in the form of a resolution; that is, beginning with the words, "Resolved, That," the word "Resolved " being underscored (printed in italics) and followed by a comma, and the word "That" beginning with a capital "T." If the word "Resolved" were replaced by the words "I move," the resolution would become a motion. A resolution is always a main motion. In some sections of the country the word "resolve" is frequently used instead of "resolution." In assemblies with paid employees, instructions given to employees are called "orders" instead of "resolutions," and the enacting word, "Ordered" is used instead of "Resolved." ~~continues~~ After a question has been stated by the chair, it is before the assembly for consideration and action. All resolutions, reports of committees, communications to the assembly, and all amendments proposed to them, and all other motions except the Undebatable Motions mentioned in 45, may be debated before final action is taken on them, unless by a two-thirds vote the assembly decides to dispose of them without debate. By a two-thirds vote is meant two-thirds of the votes cast, a quorum being present. In the debate each member has the right to speak twice on the same question on the same day (except on an appeal), but cannot make a second speech on the same question as long as any member who has not spoken on that question desires the floor. No one can speak longer than ten minutes at a time without permission of the assembly. Debate must be limited to the merits of the immediately pending question — that is, the last question stated by the chair that is still pending; except that in a few cases the main question is also open to debate ~~45~~. Speakers must address their remarks to the presiding officer, be courteous in their language and deportment, and avoid all personalities, never alluding to the officers or other members by name, where possible to avoid it, nor to the motives of members.
	9	+
	10	+
	11	+====Merriam Webster====
	12	+formally forbid (something) by law, rule, or other authority: laws prohibiting cruelty to animals.
	13	+And, discussion of specific policy-questions is crucial for skills development—-we
	14	+AND
	15	+policies have macro-level implications and other viewpoints through roleplaying which fosters tolerance
	16	+
	17	+
	18	+====Finally, topical fairness requirements are key to effective dialogue – monopolizing strategy and prep makes the discussion one-sided and subverts any meaningful negative role====
	19	+Galloway, 7 – Professor, Communication Studies, Samford University (Ryan, "Dinner and Conversation at the Argumentative Table: Reconceptualizing Debate as an Argumentative Dialogue," Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28, 5-7, http://www.cedadebate.org/files/2007CAD.pdf)//SY
	20	+Debate as a dialogue sets an argumentative table, where all parties receive a relatively
	21	+AND
	22	+substitutes for topical action do not accrue the dialogical benefits of topical advocacy.
	23	+
	24	+
	25	+====Voter for substantive engagement and advocacy skills- only real world issue====
	26	+They should lose- presented different advocacy.
	27	+
	28	+
	29	+==Cap==
	30	+Narratives are accommodated into hegemonic structures- they obscure the connection between particular stories and universal problems and place certain truths beyond question- this is an epistemological indict
	31	+Patricia Ewick and Susan S. Silbey Law and Society Review, 00239216, 1995, Vol. 29, Issue 2, KK
	32	+In the previous section… narrative of right and liability.
	33	+
	34	+
	35	+====K means non falsfifiable- we might agree that yours are good, bot co-opted ones are probably bad eg cap fuel industry====
	36	+
	37	+
	38	+====Real documents prove- incredible corruption and deception====
	39	+,,Kathy,, Mulvey Et Al 15 ,,Seth Shulman Contributors Dave Anderson Nancy Cole Jayne Piepenburg Jean Sideris July 2015 ""The Climate Deception Dossiers" Internal Fossil Fuel Industry Memos Reveal Decades of Corporate Disinformation" http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/07/The-Climate-Deception-Dossiers.pdf,,
	40	+The internal documents collected and excerpted in this report tell the story of this
	41	+AND
	42	+violent enough. Sometimes doing nothing is the most violent thing to do.
	43	+
	44	+
	45	+====No perms for methodological affirmatives====
	46	+Not a policy-purpose of trad policy = to establish opportunity cost between other policies.
	47	+Moots comparison of methods which would be key to crit education
	48	+Co-option of different movements- would be a link to cap and a voter for advocacy skills- kills ability to test different advocacies.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-10-15 13:45:55.889

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Horowitz

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Evanston

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+5

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Kinkaid Yang Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1- Narratives K

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+St Marks