Changes for page Katy Taylor Ribera Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:37
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-09-12 23:01:11. 871 +2016-09-12 23:01:11.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,26 @@ 1 +A. Interpretation: On the NSDA topic “Resolved: Countries ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power,” the AFF must specify and defend the implementation of a policy action by a government. 2 + 3 +Resolved means policy: 4 +Parcher 1 Jeff, Fmr. Debate Coach at Georgetown University, February, http://www.ndtceda.com/archives/200102/0790.html 5 +(1) Pardon me if...to a question. 6 + 7 +B. Violation: The AC does not specify nor defend the implementation of a policy action by a government. 8 + 9 +C. Standards 10 +1. Debatability 11 + 12 +2. Advocacy Shift 13 + 14 +Pre-Empts: 15 +1. Under my interp we can still debate about means and abstract moral theories, but the AFF must also defend implementations as well. 16 +2. Debaters can still philosophically justify a specific advocacy if you want philosophical ground. Contractualism cares about impacts; it just doesn’t aggregate them; not reading a plan text makes it impossible for me to link offense to your framework. 17 + 18 +D. The voter is fairness 19 + 20 +Drop the debater 21 +Use Competing Interpretations 22 + 23 +No RVI’s. 24 + 25 +You vote on theory because: 26 +By not doing so, you are accepting that it is ok to skew my strategy by necessitating that I defend multiple impacts, whereas the affirmative can argue one specific impact in the 1AR. In competitive activities such as debate, fairness is key. For example, I will not want to play a game if I must complete ten goals to win, whereas my opponent only needs to compete one. This precludes their standard of education - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-09-12 23:01:12.261 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Katy Taylor Ribera Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +SEPOCT Countries T - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Grapevine