Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[13]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[13]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[13]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-10-19 20:58:53.988
	1	+2016-10-19 20:58:53.0

Caselist.CitesClass[13]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,26 @@
	1	+The 1AC misdiagnoses the problem- you simplify racism to a question of bodily characteristics and overall goals, which ignores the social context of oppression. Yamamoto 2
	2	+Yamamoto, Eric (Professor of Law, University of Hawai'i Law School; Visiting Professor of Law, Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California at Berkeley, 1999.)., and Jen-L. W. Lyman. "Racializing environmental justice." U. Colo. L. Rev. 72 (2001): 311.
	3	+Finally, the established framework tends to assume that all
	4	+And
	5	+make this simplifying assumption about race and culture.
	6	+Trying to articulate your solvency advocate as a reason that you meet the wishes of
	7	+
	8	+ANALYTICS
	9	+This ignores the actual voices of the oppressed- applying blanket statements to all just re-affirms dominant power structures. Yamamoto 99
	10	+Yamamoto, Eric (Professor of Law, University of Hawai'i Law School; Visiting Professor of Law, Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California at Berkeley, 1999.)., and Jen-L. W. Lyman. "Racializing environmental justice." U. Colo. L. Rev. 72 (2001): 311.
	11	+The framework, however, at times also undercuts environmental justice
	12	+AND
	13	+ for the environmental cause.
	14	+This means your movement just harms traditional groups, such as indigenous people- turns case and no solvency
	15	+Yamamoto 01, Eric (Professor of Law, University of Hawai'i Law School; Visiting Professor of Law, Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California at Berkeley, 1999.)., and Jen-L. W. Lyman. "Racializing environmental justice." U. Colo. L. Rev. 72 (2001): 311.
	16	+James Huffman also criticizes the traditional environmental justice framework, but from the perspective of Native American economic development. He identifies
	17	+AND
	18	+centralized policies (whatever their origin and content) often disregards tribal sovereignty and the special interests of indigenous peoples.
	19	+Thus, the alternative: communities should individually decide for themselves whether they want to prohibit the production of nuclear power in their area. Mutually exclusive: they decide for themselves, so they don’t actually necessarily ban.
	20	+
	21	+Alt solves best- you cannot make rulings over the needs of the oppressed without reifying their oppression. Friere 68 PEDAGOGY OF THE OPPRESSED Paulo Freire. 1968.
	22	+It is essential for the oppressed
	23	+And
	24	+but committed involvement.
	25	+The role of the judge is to vote for the debater that best deconstructs dominant
	26	+Analytic

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-10-19 20:58:55.421

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Chris Vincent

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+New Trier CM

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+13

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+6

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Katy Taylor Ribera Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+SEPT OCT - Grouping K

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Greenhill