| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,17 @@ |
|
1 |
+Interpretation – The aff must defend the resolution as a generic statement. To clarify, you can not spec a country or enforcement mechanism. |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Violation – You defend that Countries ought to prohibit their production of nuclear power within proximity of fault lines. |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+Standards: |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+1. Common usage |
|
8 |
+Nebel 14 provides an example of governments, 2014, On specifying Just Governments, http://vbriefly.com/2014/12/19/jake-nebel-on-specifying-just-governments/ |
|
9 |
+To my ear, the generic reading is correct. I think the best evidence |
|
10 |
+AND |
|
11 |
+familiarity with the national circuit’s flavor of the week, avoids these problems. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+2. Limits |
|
14 |
+Harris 13 |
|
15 |
+Scott Harris (Director of Debate at U Kansas, 2006 National Debate Coach of the Year, Vice President of the American Forensic Association, 2nd speaker at the NDT in 1981). “This ballot.” 5 April 2013. CEDA Forums. http://www.cedadebate.org/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4762.0;attach=1655 |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+voters |