Changes for page Katy Taylor Ribera Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:37
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,26 +1,0 @@ 1 -A. Interpretation: On the NSDA topic “Resolved: Countries ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power,” the AFF must specify and defend the implementation of a policy action by a government. 2 - 3 -Resolved means policy: 4 -Parcher 1 Jeff, Fmr. Debate Coach at Georgetown University, February, http://www.ndtceda.com/archives/200102/0790.html 5 -(1) Pardon me if...to a question. 6 - 7 -B. Violation: The AC does not specify nor defend the implementation of a policy action by a government. 8 - 9 -C. Standards 10 -1. Debatability 11 - 12 -2. Advocacy Shift 13 - 14 -Pre-Empts: 15 -1. Under my interp we can still debate about means and abstract moral theories, but the AFF must also defend implementations as well. 16 -2. Debaters can still philosophically justify a specific advocacy if you want philosophical ground. Contractualism cares about impacts; it just doesn’t aggregate them; not reading a plan text makes it impossible for me to link offense to your framework. 17 - 18 -D. The voter is fairness 19 - 20 -Drop the debater 21 -Use Competing Interpretations 22 - 23 -No RVI’s. 24 - 25 -You vote on theory because: 26 -By not doing so, you are accepting that it is ok to skew my strategy by necessitating that I defend multiple impacts, whereas the affirmative can argue one specific impact in the 1AR. In competitive activities such as debate, fairness is key. For example, I will not want to play a game if I must complete ten goals to win, whereas my opponent only needs to compete one. This precludes their standard of education - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-09-12 23:01:12.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -idk - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -idk - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Katy Taylor Ribera Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -SEPOCT Countries T - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Grapevine