Changes for page Kamiak Battle Aff
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 7 added, 3 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[0]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -I will not be disclosing cites this season, because of team policy. If you have any other questions about my positions (case areas) - you can contact me via Facebook (Niko Battle). I will only give additional information to small school debaters. For example, if you are from Harvard-Westlake, Greenhill, Valley, LHP, Scarsdale, etc. don't expect me to be too helpful. You and your copious amount of coaches and prep should be able to handle whatever I read. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-24 22:20:15.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Kamiak Battle Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0-DISCLOSURE - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any
- Caselist.RoundClass[0]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-24 22:20:13.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any
- Caselist.RoundClass[1]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-14 01:18:08.399 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Sabin, Orlando, Hartman - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Gig Harbor CM - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Semis - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Central Valley
- Caselist.CitesClass[3]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,3 @@ 1 +Plan Text: The USFG will abrogate qualified immunity in all of its 50 states and territories. 2 + 3 +Message me on FB if there are any theory/T interps that you want me to conform to. If you don't and you read theory/T, not only will I be really sad, but I will also show the judge this wiki and read meta theory on you...the latter two I'm guessing you probably don't want. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-24 22:58:29.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Sabin, Orlando, Hartman - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Gig Harbor CM - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Semis - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Kamiak Battle Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1- ND PLAN TEXT - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Central Valley
- Caselist.CitesClass[4]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,66 @@ 1 +The role of the judge is to revolt against that form of anti-blackness by interjecting Black speech into the conversation. Put your theory shells away the K controls the internal link to any education or fairness impacts Schnyder 8 Damien Michael Schnyder (PhD, University of California’s President’s Postdoctoral Fellow) "First Strike," https://www.lib.utexas.edu/etd/d/2009/schnyderd25688/schnyderd25688.pdf 2 + 3 +Ms. Fox’s clear disregard for her students belies a racist logic that dehumanizes Blackness 4 + 5 +AND 6 + 7 + even teachers with the best of intentions have to realize that their role is vital to the maintenance of state domination of Black subjects. 8 + 9 +The Ballot is a performative act – the ballot is exercising binding power. Every ballot matters – repetition is what confers power on the performative act. What we as debaters, spectator, and judges do today matters. 5Butler 93 Butler, noted for her studies on gender and teaches composition and rhetoric at Berkeley, 93 (Dr. Judith, ‘Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex’) pp. 225 LRP 10 + 11 +Performative acts are forms of authoritative speech: most performatives, for instance, are 12 + 13 +AND 14 + 15 +this citation that gives the performative its binding or conferring power. 16 + 17 + 18 +Thus the role of the ballot is to endorse the debater who best disassembles anti-blackness through micro-political action. 19 + 20 +Currently, the debate space is ignoring the oppression of black debaters and holding us back from addressing anti-blackness as a community, and the community systemically excludes black debaters from “speech” vis-à-vis competition. Smith 13 Elijah Smith, A Conversation in Ruins: Race and Black Participation in Lincoln Douglas Debate, Vbriefly, 9/4/13 http://vbriefly.com/2013/09/06/20139a-conversation-in-ruins-race-and-black-participation-in-lincoln-douglas-debate/ 21 + 22 +At every tournament you attend this year look around the cafeteria 23 + 24 +AND 25 + 26 + shut down competitors who engage in alternative styles and discourses, and refuse to engage in those discussions even outside of a tournament setting. 27 + 28 +And, the methodology and utilization of the 1AC is key to challenge hegemonic knowledge production – marginalized voices are excluded in the academia in the status quo. Stanley 7 Dr. Christine A. Stanley '90 is the Vice President and Associate Provost for Diversity and Professor of Higher Education Administration in the College of Education and Human Development at Texas AandM University, 2007, “When Counter Narratives Meet Master Narratives in the Journal Editorial-Review Process”, http://edr.sagepub.com/content/36/1/14.full.pdf+html//dickies 29 + 30 +I am a Black woman professor and have served in a variety 31 + 32 +AND 33 + 34 + These alternative lenses of analyses and interpretations of experiences frequently question and criticize master narratives. 35 + 36 + 37 +I advocate that public colleges and universities ought not restrict the right to free speech of Black individuals 38 + 39 + 40 +Challenging hegemonic narratives within existing institutions key – giving up on academia only re-entrenches authority 41 + 42 +Giroux 13 Henry Giroux, a former professor at Penn State and currently the Global Television Network Chair of English and Cultural Studies at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, SEPTEMBER 27, 2013, “Henry Giroux on the Militarization of Public Pedagogy”, http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/09/27/teaching-and-learning-with-henry-giroux///dickies 43 + 44 +SK: Here’s a paradox for you: How do you teach social change or resistance to authority within public schools 45 + 46 +AND 47 + 48 + so critique is not enough; we need a language of critique and we need a language of possibility to be able to go forward with this. 49 + 50 + 51 +The debate space is key to stopping oppression- it begins with ending intellectual alienation Fanon ‘8 (Frantz Fanon, psychiatrist, philosopher, revolutionary, and author, Black Skin; White Masks, p. 61 Written in 1952, new edition published in 2008)//BG 52 + 53 +In this connection, I should like to say something that I have found in many other Writers 54 + 55 +AND 56 + 57 +death is in a sense a revolutionary. 58 + 59 + 60 +The k comes first 61 +Olson writes. Gary A. Olson vice president for academic affairs at Idaho State University, 2002“Justifying belief: Stanley Fish and the work of rhetoric” 62 +(3) That is, whoever is attempting to define "fairness" 63 + 64 +AND 65 + 66 +against the interests and objectives of others. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-24 23:04:35.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Erik Legried Brentwood - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Interlake Richie Ma - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Kamiak Battle Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - JF UPS 1AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +UPS
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +I will not be disclosing most cites this season, because of team policy. If you have any other questions about my positions (case areas, advocacy text, advantages) - you can contact me via Facebook (Niko Battle). I will only give additional information to small school debaters. For example, if you are from Harvard-Westlake, Greenhill, Valley, LHP, Scarsdale, etc. don't expect me to be too helpful. You and your copious amount of coaches and prep should be able to handle whatever I read. If there are any theory interns you want me to conform to hmm before round 'else I'll read meta-theory and show the judge this part of my wiki...thats no fun for anyone :(. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-24 23:07:22.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Kamiak Battle Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - DISCLOSURE - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any
- Caselist.CitesClass[6]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,70 @@ 1 +==Part One is the Framing:== 2 + 3 +First, speech restrictions, not as speech codes but as the denial of certain bodies access to political spaces, dooms us to reinforce oppression to disabled bodies. Normative evaluation of the resolution must follow a change in epistemology, Hedva Johanna Hedva, xx-xx-xxxx, "Sick Woman Theory," Mask Magazine, http://www.maskmagazine.com/not-again/struggle/sick-woman-theory 4 +If we take Hannah Arendt’s definition of the political 5 +AND 6 +as political activists. 7 + 8 +Second, put away your T arguments, the political subject can never be a disabled body meaning the k controls the internal link it’s the only way to avoid analyzing the right to speech before bodies have equal access. Liberal theory naturalizes ability as an inherent feature of speech, Appudarai and Volger Appadurai and Volger 11 (Carol Appadurai is an Associate Professor of History, The New School Candace Vogler is an associate professor in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Chicago, where she teaches ethics, social and political philosophy, and gender and sexuality studies., "The Critical Limits of Embodiment: Disability's Criticism", Public Culture, Volume 13, Number 3, Fall 2011) DR 15 9 +Disability studies teaches that 10 +AND 11 +of mutual desire. 12 + 13 +Third, an interruption of the norms in the political, including debate, is needed. Normalized reactions to disability are exclusive; utopian thinking helps solve. Campbell 14 +(Fiona Kumari Campbell, Associate Professor in Law for Griffith Law School, and a Adjunct Professor in Disability Studies at the University of Kelaniya. "Stalking Ableism: Using Disability to Expose 'Abled' Narcissism." In the book "Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions." Chapter 13. Palgrave McMillan, 2012.) 15 +Difference can be 16 +AND 17 +the impairment state. 18 + 19 +Fourth, the role of the ballot is to endorse the debater who has the best methodology to exposing, understanding, and disrupting oppressive ableist mindsets through micro-political action. 20 + 21 +The classroom should be a space of liberatory discourse. Dreaming with disability studies produces an active engagement in the classroom. Exploring utopian alternatives to disability opens up the revolutionary pedagogical potential this space has, and allows us to explore alternatives that have real impacts all of us. Erevelles 14, 22 +Home Vol 34, No 2 (2014) Erevelles Thinking with Disability Studies Nirmala Erevelles Professor, Social and Cultural Studies in Education, The University of Alabama E-mail: nerevell@bamaed.ua.edu 23 +Dreaming, then, with 24 +AND 25 +all our difference(s). 26 + 27 +==Part Two is the Substance:== 28 +Our advocacy is that we as debaters takes an imaginative act and not restrict the free speech of disabled bodies. 29 + 30 +The law and speech codes reinforce an ontological dichotomy between abled and disabled bodies. We have an obligation to question ableist notions of power which form the root cause of oppression. Campbell 8 Fiona Kumari Campbell is a leading disability studies theorist (2008) by Fiona Kumari Campbell http://www.stopableism.org/view_2.asp 31 +There are problems 32 +AND 33 +mechanisms of ordering. 34 + 35 +And, utopian theorization of imaginative acts is key; only imagining utopian worlds free of ableism can upheave the very roots of the political’s exclusion of disabled bodies, Campbell 2 36 +The matter of re-imagining 37 +AND 38 +the realms of the perverse. 39 + 40 +Next, the performative act of the 1AC provides liberatory potential for the debate space endorsing our methodology causes a spillover into our everyday lives. We need challenge hegemonic conceptions of normality which exclude disabled bodies from engagement through micro-p action. Beckett 13 41 +Beckett 13’- Angharad Anti-oppressive pedagogy and¶ disability: possibilities and challenges, School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds- 42 + 43 +Serious and systemic 44 +AND 45 +oppressed’ and ‘privileged’. 46 +==Part Three is the Underview== 47 + 48 +First, this space is key- an analysis of disabled bodies is a prior question to any other form of discourse, understanding why bodies are excluded from discursive spaces is necessary to have meaningful dialogue to begin with. This means the aff is a pre-requisite to fair or educational debate because accessibility controls the internal link to all your theory impacts. Put away your T and theory right now. 49 +Boys 8 (Jos, “challenging the 'normal': towards new conceptual frameworks”, http://www.sowhatisnormal.co.uk/challenging) 50 +This shifts the 51 +AND 52 +of that difference. 53 + 54 +analytic theory spike 55 + 56 +analytic weighing 57 + 58 +Comparative Worlds Approach Maintains Flexibility For Both Debaters, Nelson. Adam F. JD, Director of Lincoln-Douglas Debate and Mock Trial at The Harker School, San Jose, CA. 59 +Instead, it seems 60 +And 61 +the same way. 62 + 63 +Fourth, Debate is Excluding certain bodies and fairness is part of that problem; embrace k debate to move beyond and liberate oppressed bodies, Brown. (Adam Brown, 2016, NSD Update www.nsdupdate.com) 64 +First, debate, as 65 +AND 66 +be truly liberatory. 67 + 68 +Analytic theory spike 69 + 70 +Analytic Theory Spike - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-29 02:35:20.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +James Brock - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hawken HG - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Kamiak Battle Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - JF Ableism K - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Emory
- Caselist.RoundClass[3]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-24 22:58:27.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Sabin, Orlando, Hartman - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Gig Harbor CM - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Semis - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Central Valley
- Caselist.RoundClass[4]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-24 23:04:33.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Erik Legried Brentwood - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Interlake Richie Ma - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,7 @@ 1 +1AC was non-T performance K 2 + 3 +In CX both debaters and the judge agreed to have the round outside as a way to solve part of the pre-fiat harms the k k'd (lol) 4 + 5 +1NC was 3off (I think) 6 + 7 +2N collapsed to Cap K - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +UPS
- Caselist.RoundClass[6]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-29 02:35:15.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +James Brock - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hawken HG - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,9 @@ 1 +1AC Read Aff 2 + 3 +1N 2 off then caseT (Interp is "the off must be topical)Hate Speech CP 4 + 5 +1A We meet and new links into the K then random stuff on substance 6 + 7 +2N No collapse goes for both offa few new args 8 + 9 +2A I don't remember and I can't find my flows - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Emory