Changes for page Jefferson City Manda Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:37
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[1]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-12-11 23:11:10. 8641 +2016-12-11 23:11:10.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[1]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,21 @@ 1 +A. Interpretation: the aff should ONLY defend enactment of a topical plan—that means a state policy action of the USFG limting qualified immunity. 2 +~-~-~-~- 3 +Limit means "bound." 4 +Court of Appeals of Maryland 2 (SY-LENE OF WASHINGTON, INC. v. STARWOOD URBAN RETAIL II, LLC No. 132, September Term, 2002 COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND 376 Md. 157; 829 A.2d 540; 2003 Md. LEXIS 455 July 29, 2003, Filed) 5 +Definitions of the ... area or range. 6 +~-~-~-~- 7 +Resolved means the affirmative must defend the implementation of a policy action by a government. 8 +Parcher 1 (Jeff, Fmr. Debate Coach at Georgetown University, February, http://www.ndtceda.com/archives/200102/0790.html) 9 +Pardon me if ... to a question. 10 +~-~-~-~- 11 +B-C. Analytics 12 +~-~-~-~- 13 +Preparation and clash—changing the topic post facto manipulates balance of prep, which structurally favors the aff because they speak last and permute alternatives—strategic fairness is key to engaging a well-prepared opponent – they monopolize strategy and subvert any meaningful neg role 14 +Ryan Galloway 7, Samford Comm prof, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28, 2007 15 +Debate as a ... of topical advocacy. 16 +~-~-~-~- 17 +Only maintaining a limited topic of discussion and a clear stasis for both teams provides the necessary and requisite foundation for decision-making and advocacy skills and ensures clash within debates – even if they are contestable, that is different from being valuably debatable. 18 +Steinberg and Freeley ‘8 *Austin J. Freeley is a Boston based attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, AND **David L. Steinberg , Lecturer of Communication Studies @ U Miami, Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making pp45- 19 +Debate is a ...the following discussion. 20 +~-~-~-~- 21 +D-E. Analytics - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-11 23:11:12.660 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Joe Rankin - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Valley CR - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jefferson City Manda Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NOVDEV - T - Implementation Framework - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Dowling