| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,24 @@ |
|
1 |
+===Off=== |
|
2 |
+They misinterpret their Hagglund evidence - Individual people can’t truly define meaning because anyone solving for violence defines terms to help themself, but doesn’t allow for communal norms sharing. The responsibility to reconcile different ideologies of just and unjust falls onto the most powerful entity. This sovereign must reconcile differences and dictate the normative system. |
|
3 |
+Parrish Derrida`s Economy of Violence in Hobbes` Social Contract, Richard Parrish |
|
4 |
+All of the ... the natural condition. |
|
5 |
+~-~-~-~- |
|
6 |
+Therefore, the standard is promoting the will of the sovereign. |
|
7 |
+~-~-~-~- |
|
8 |
+It’s impossible to escape the NC. |
|
9 |
+Parrish 2 Derrida`s Economy of Violence in Hobbes` Social Contract, Richard Parrish |
|
10 |
+But even more ... creator of meaning. |
|
11 |
+~-~-~-~- |
|
12 |
+We preclude – Absent a sovereign, we just exist in the state of nature with no rights whatsoever. |
|
13 |
+Kant (Kant, Immanuel, and Mary J. Gregor. Practical philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 1999.) |
|
14 |
+On the contrary ... a civil condition. |
|
15 |
+~-~-~-~- |
|
16 |
+I contend limiting QI undermines the will of the sovereign. |
|
17 |
+~-~-~-~- |
|
18 |
+1. Court Clog |
|
19 |
+Putnam Charles T. Putnam Senior Assistant Attorney General, New Hampshire and Charles T. Ferris JD, Franklin Pierce Law Center, “Defending a Maligned Defense: e Policy Bases of the Qualified Immunity Defense in Actions Under 42 USC 1983,” Bridgeport Law Review, Vol. 12, 1992. |
|
20 |
+National resources are ... defendants facing suit |
|
21 |
+~-~-~-~- |
|
22 |
+2. Overdetterence |
|
23 |
+Hyman Jonathan M. Hyman, Associate Professor of Law, Rutgers, “Qualified Immunity Reconsidered,” Wayne Law Review, Vol. 27, 1981. |
|
24 |
+Qualified immunity is ... can be justified |