| ... |
... |
@@ -1,58
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-====Discourse has normative rules that govern discussion. Inclusivity of speakers is create an ethical theory that includes those speakers.==== |
| 2 |
|
-=====Habermas 98 (Jurgen Habermas, kraut sociologist extraordinaire. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, 1998 MIT Press, p. 4)===== |
| 3 |
|
-In the absence...connected with it. |
| 4 |
|
-====Deliberation by individuals, especially victims and marginalized groups, facilitates their views in decision-making and empowers them on the ethico-social stage.==== |
| 5 |
|
-=====Habermas 03 Truth and Justification. Jurgen Habermas. Translated by Barbara Fultner. The MIT Press. Massachusetts. 2003===== |
| 6 |
|
-A constitutional state...existing constitution itself. |
| 7 |
|
-====Free speech is a pre-requisite to any rational moral system - without it self-realization is impossible.==== |
| 8 |
|
-=====Eberle 94 (Eberle, Law @ Roger Williams, 1994 Wake Forest LR, Winter)===== |
| 9 |
|
-The Court's decision ...be vigilantly investigated. |
| 10 |
|
-====The solution to intolerance is more speech and discourse, not less.==== |
| 11 |
|
-=====Coleman and Alger 96 Arthur L. Coleman (Senior Policy Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights in the Department of Education; JD, Duke Law) and Jonathan R Alger (former Senior Attorney Advisor with the Department of Education; JD, Harvard Law). “Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights of Free Speech and Freedom from Discrimination on University Campuses.” Journal of College and University Law. Vol 23, No. 1. 1996.===== |
| 12 |
|
-Articulate Values of...within its midst. |
| 13 |
|
-====Thus the standard is to promote discourse.==== |
| 14 |
|
-====Also, it is contradictory to deny one’s right to engage in deliberation as my opponent may do with another framework – AC precedes.==== |
| 15 |
|
-=====Hoppe (“From the Economics of Laissez Faire to The Ethics of Libertarianism,” Hans-Hermann Hoppe, in Man, Economy, and Liberty: Essays in Honor of Murray N. Rothbard, The Ludwig von Mises Institute Auburn University)===== |
| 16 |
|
-First, it should...proposal at all. |
| 17 |
|
-====Colleges restrict student’s ability to exercise their free speech.==== |
| 18 |
|
-=====Wheeler 16 (Wheeler, Lydia. "Colleges Are Restricting Free Speech on Campus, Lawmakers Say." TheHill. N.p., 02 Feb. 2016. Web. 06 Dec. 2016.)===== |
| 19 |
|
-In protecting students...use,” he said. |
| 20 |
|
-====Thus, we affirm that in the United States, public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected free speech.==== |
| 21 |
|
-====Free-speech restrictions like free-speech zones harm democracy and stop further revolutionary thinking, preventing discourse in the long term.==== |
| 22 |
|
-=====Maloney 16 (Colleges Have No Right to Limit Students’ Free Speech, Cliff Maloney, Jr, Oct. 13, 2016, Time Magazine, http://time.com/4530197/college-free-speech-zone/, GAR)===== |
| 23 |
|
-Unfortunately, things have...everywhere in America |
| 24 |
|
-====Censorship in schools encourages other governmental forms of censorship, causing widespread harm to discourse==== |
| 25 |
|
-=====Lukianoff (Greg Lukianoff, president and CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) FIRE. "What Are Speech Codes? - FIRE." FIRE. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 Dec. 2016.)===== |
| 26 |
|
-These attitudes stay...FIRE’s Spotlight Database. |
| 27 |
|
-====Bans on hate speech lead to political censorship==== |
| 28 |
|
-=====McConnell 12 Michael W. McConnell http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/24/books/review/the-harm-in-hate-speech-by-jeremy-waldron.html===== |
| 29 |
|
-One reason is...the censorship more. |
| 30 |
|
-====Suppressive regimes are especially silencing for revolutionary voices.==== |
| 31 |
|
-=====Bernstein 03 (David E. Bernstein is a professor of Law at George Mason University, 2003, “Defending the First Amendment from Antidiscrimination Laws”, http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=489063)===== |
| 32 |
|
-Ironically, protecting freedom...well to learn. |
| 33 |
|
-====Free speech on campus is key to fulfilling the purpose of college and is disappearing rapidly.==== |
| 34 |
|
-=====Sterett 15 Sterett, Noel W. "Public Colleges or Free Speech Silencers?" Mauck and Baker, LLC. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 Dec. 2016. http://mauckbaker.com/public-colleges-or-free-speech-silencers.===== |
| 35 |
|
-Historically, the purpose...six feet wide. |
| 36 |
|
-====Freedom of expression is needed on campuses for diverse discourse.==== |
| 37 |
|
-=====Wogulis 09 Daniel Wogulis 2009 https://www.thefire.org/on-the-consequences-of-oppressing-free-speech/===== |
| 38 |
|
-Since its inception...of American society. |
| 39 |
|
-====University of Delaware proves SQuo harms – students are conditioned to rely on others to make decisions==== |
| 40 |
|
-=====Wogulis 09 Daniel Wogulis 2009 https://www.thefire.org/on-the-consequences-of-oppressing-free-speech/===== |
| 41 |
|
-This oppression of...members of society. |
| 42 |
|
-===Underview=== |
| 43 |
|
-====Hate speech is not constitutionally protected.==== |
| 44 |
|
-=====ITLW (Information Technology Law Wiki, "Constitutionally protected speech", itlaw.wikia.com/wiki/Constitutionally_protected_speech)===== |
| 45 |
|
-All speech is...of the situation. |
| 46 |
|
-====Proliferation of hate speech does not correlate to increased violence, but hate speech bans increase hate speech.==== |
| 47 |
|
-=====Heinze 14 (Eric Heinze, Nineteen arguments for hate speech bans – and against them, Free Speech Debate, 3/31/14, http://freespeechdebate.com/en/discuss/nineteen-arguments-for-hate-speech-bans-and-against-them/)===== |
| 48 |
|
-Here too, within...bans and penalties. |
| 49 |
|
-====Solutions to critical issues require acting within the hegemony first.==== |
| 50 |
|
-=====Kapoor 08 (Ilan, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University, “The Postcolonial Studies of Development.” 2008. p.138-139)===== |
| 51 |
|
-There are perhaps...deflect their claims |
| 52 |
|
-====Give Aff RVIs on T/Theory.==== |
| 53 |
|
-A) Strat skewB) Discourages bad theory—debaters won’t run it frivolously if they know they can lose on it. |
| 54 |
|
-C) No-risk issues hurt education |
| 55 |
|
-D) Double bind |
| 56 |
|
-====Drop any Neg Theory argument run on the Aff advocacy if it isn’t checked in CX. To clarify, you must read the violation and ask me to comply by specifying.==== |
| 57 |
|
-A) Predictability |
| 58 |
|
-B) Clash |