| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,59 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Discourse has normative rules that govern discussion. Inclusivity of speakers is create an ethical theory that includes those speakers.==== |
|
2 |
+=====Habermas 98 (Jurgen Habermas, kraut sociologist extraordinaire. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, 1998 MIT Press, p. 4)===== |
|
3 |
+In the absence...connected with it. |
|
4 |
+====Deliberation by individuals, especially victims and marginalized groups, facilitates their views in decision-making and empowers them on the ethico-social stage.==== |
|
5 |
+=====Habermas 03 Truth and Justification. Jurgen Habermas. Translated by Barbara Fultner. The MIT Press. Massachusetts. 2003===== |
|
6 |
+A constitutional state...existing constitution itself. |
|
7 |
+====Free speech is a pre-requisite to any rational moral system - without it self-realization is impossible.==== |
|
8 |
+=====Eberle 94 (Eberle, Law @ Roger Williams, 1994 Wake Forest LR, Winter)===== |
|
9 |
+The Court's decision ...be vigilantly investigated. |
|
10 |
+====The solution to intolerance is more speech and discourse, not less.==== |
|
11 |
+=====Coleman and Alger 96 Arthur L. Coleman (Senior Policy Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights in the Department of Education; JD, Duke Law) and Jonathan R Alger (former Senior Attorney Advisor with the Department of Education; JD, Harvard Law). “Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights of Free Speech and Freedom from Discrimination on University Campuses.” Journal of College and University Law. Vol 23, No. 1. 1996.===== |
|
12 |
+Articulate Values of...within its midst. |
|
13 |
+====Thus the standard is to promote discourse.==== |
|
14 |
+====Also, it is contradictory to deny one’s right to engage in deliberation as my opponent may do with another framework – AC precedes.==== |
|
15 |
+=====Hoppe (“From the Economics of Laissez Faire to The Ethics of Libertarianism,” Hans-Hermann Hoppe, in Man, Economy, and Liberty: Essays in Honor of Murray N. Rothbard, The Ludwig von Mises Institute Auburn University)===== |
|
16 |
+First, it should...proposal at all. |
|
17 |
+====Colleges restrict student’s ability to exercise their free speech.==== |
|
18 |
+=====Wheeler 16 (Wheeler, Lydia. "Colleges Are Restricting Free Speech on Campus, Lawmakers Say." TheHill. N.p., 02 Feb. 2016. Web. 06 Dec. 2016.)===== |
|
19 |
+In protecting students...use,” he said. |
|
20 |
+====Thus, we affirm that in the United States, public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected free speech.==== |
|
21 |
+====Free-speech restrictions like free-speech zones harm democracy and stop further revolutionary thinking, preventing discourse in the long term.==== |
|
22 |
+=====Maloney 16 (Colleges Have No Right to Limit Students’ Free Speech, Cliff Maloney, Jr, Oct. 13, 2016, Time Magazine, http://time.com/4530197/college-free-speech-zone/, GAR)===== |
|
23 |
+Unfortunately, things have...everywhere in America |
|
24 |
+====Censorship in schools encourages other governmental forms of censorship, causing widespread harm to discourse==== |
|
25 |
+=====Lukianoff (Greg Lukianoff, president and CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) FIRE. "What Are Speech Codes? - FIRE." FIRE. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 Dec. 2016.)===== |
|
26 |
+These attitudes stay...FIRE’s Spotlight Database. |
|
27 |
+====Bans on hate speech lead to political censorship==== |
|
28 |
+=====McConnell 12 Michael W. McConnell http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/24/books/review/the-harm-in-hate-speech-by-jeremy-waldron.html===== |
|
29 |
+One reason is...the censorship more. |
|
30 |
+====Suppressive regimes are especially silencing for revolutionary voices.==== |
|
31 |
+=====Bernstein 03 (David E. Bernstein is a professor of Law at George Mason University, 2003, “Defending the First Amendment from Antidiscrimination Laws”, http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=489063)===== |
|
32 |
+Ironically, protecting freedom...well to learn. |
|
33 |
+====Free speech on campus is key to fulfilling the purpose of college and is disappearing rapidly.==== |
|
34 |
+=====Sterett 15 Sterett, Noel W. "Public Colleges or Free Speech Silencers?" Mauck and Baker, LLC. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 Dec. 2016. http://mauckbaker.com/public-colleges-or-free-speech-silencers.===== |
|
35 |
+Historically, the purpose...six feet wide. |
|
36 |
+====Freedom of expression is needed on campuses for diverse discourse.==== |
|
37 |
+=====Wogulis 09 Daniel Wogulis 2009 https://www.thefire.org/on-the-consequences-of-oppressing-free-speech/===== |
|
38 |
+Since its inception...of American society. |
|
39 |
+====University of Delaware proves SQuo harms – students are conditioned to rely on others to make decisions==== |
|
40 |
+=====Wogulis 09 Daniel Wogulis 2009 https://www.thefire.org/on-the-consequences-of-oppressing-free-speech/===== |
|
41 |
+This oppression of...members of society. |
|
42 |
+===Underview=== |
|
43 |
+====Hate speech is not constitutionally protected.==== |
|
44 |
+=====ITLW (Information Technology Law Wiki, "Constitutionally protected speech", itlaw.wikia.com/wiki/Constitutionally_protected_speech)===== |
|
45 |
+All speech is...of the situation. |
|
46 |
+====Proliferation of hate speech does not correlate to increased violence, but hate speech bans increase hate speech.==== |
|
47 |
+=====Heinze 14 (Eric Heinze, Nineteen arguments for hate speech bans – and against them, Free Speech Debate, 3/31/14, http://freespeechdebate.com/en/discuss/nineteen-arguments-for-hate-speech-bans-and-against-them/)===== |
|
48 |
+Here too, within...bans and penalties. |
|
49 |
+====Solutions to critical issues require acting within the hegemony first.==== |
|
50 |
+=====Kapoor 08 (Ilan, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University, “The Postcolonial Studies of Development.” 2008. p.138-139)===== |
|
51 |
+There are perhaps...deflect their claims |
|
52 |
+====Give Aff RVIs on T/Theory.==== |
|
53 |
+A) Strat skew |
|
54 |
+B) Discourages bad theory—debaters won’t run it frivolously if they know they can lose on it. |
|
55 |
+C) No-risk issues hurt education |
|
56 |
+D) Double bind |
|
57 |
+====Drop any Neg Theory argument run on the Aff advocacy if it isn’t checked in CX. To clarify, you must read the violation and ask me to comply by specifying.==== |
|
58 |
+A) Predictability |
|
59 |
+B) Clash |