Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[2]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[2]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,5 +1,0 @@
1		-A: If the affirmative debater claims in the AC that they are willing to modify their advocacy in CX, they may not claim in the 1ar that CX is ambiguous since judges don’t flow it, so you ought to err aff on questions of what was said in CX.
2		-
3		-A: debaters must disclose all broken positions (including ACs, NCs, DAs, CPs and Ks) on the NDCA LD 2016-2017 wiki under their own name, school, and correct side with cites, tags, the first three and the last three words of all cards read at least an hour before the round begins.
4		-
5		-A: If debaters read theory spikes in the AC, they must disclose them on the NDCA LD 2016-2017 wiki under their own name at least an hour before the round. To clarify, a theory spike is a theoretical argument in the aff that has an interpretation and standards, that could potentially be extended as an offensive voting issue in the 1ar depending on the negative strategy.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-17 12:46:41.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-All

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-All

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Hunter College Potischman Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-0 - Theory Interps

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-All