Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[42]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[42]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,91 +1,0 @@
1		-Individuals must be considered to have a right to property, otherwise it’s impossible to consider them as volitional
2		-Kant, Immanuel. Kant: The Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy) 2nd Edition. by Immanuel Kant (Author, philosopher), Mary J. Gregor (Editor), Roger J. Sullivan (Introduction). Cambridge University Press 1996. 1797. NP 8/2/16.
3		-It is possible
4		-AND
5		-mine or yours.
6		-
7		-Human beings can not reject their personality and ability to be free –reducing individuals to mere means makes ethics incoherent
8		-Kant 2, Immanuel. Kant: The Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy) 2nd Edition. by Immanuel Kant (Author, philosopher), Mary J. Gregor (Editor), Roger J. Sullivan (Introduction). Cambridge University Press 1996. 1797. NP 8/2/16.
9		-A human being
10		-AND
11		-free from blame
12		-
13		-The ability to lay claim to property rights necessitates the existence of a collective will that can have power over individuals
14		-Kant 3, Immanuel. Kant: The Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy) 2nd Edition. by Immanuel Kant (Author, philosopher), Mary J. Gregor (Editor), Roger J. Sullivan (Introduction). Cambridge University Press 1996. 1797. NP 8/2/16.
15		-Bracketed for gendered language
16		-When I declare
17		-AND
18		-a civil constitution.
19		-
20		-This outweighs – a) unilateral wills are only contingent – only an omnilateral will makes rights claims conclusive
21		-Kant 4, Immanuel. Kant: The Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy) 2nd Edition. by Immanuel Kant (Author, philosopher), Mary J. Gregor (Editor), Roger J. Sullivan (Introduction). Cambridge University Press 1996. 1797. NP 8/2/16.
22		-No insight can
23		-AND
24		-mine or yours.
25		-
26		-b) rights must be derived a priori rather than a posteriori – the aff framework is the only way to derive state obligations
27		-Kant 5, Immanuel. Kant: The Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy) 2nd Edition. by Immanuel Kant (Author, philosopher), Mary J. Gregor (Editor), Roger J. Sullivan (Introduction). Cambridge University Press 1996. 1797. NP 8/2/16.
28		-The concept of
29		-AND
30		-from using the object.
31		-
32		-c) it’s the only way to avoid property rights being contingent
33		-Kant 6, Immanuel. Kant: The Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy) 2nd Edition. by Immanuel Kant (Author, philosopher), Mary J. Gregor (Editor), Roger J. Sullivan (Introduction). Cambridge University Press 1996. 1797. NP 8/2/16.
34		-So the way
35		-AND
36		-he contradicts himself.
37		-
38		-Thus, the standard is consistency with the omnilateral will. Put away your generic Kant answers – the aff uses Kantian political philosophy, not moral philosophy.
39		-Ripstein 9, Arthur. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts . London, England 2009. NP 8/4/16.
40		-In the same
41		-AND
42		-person or property.43
43		-
44		-To clarify, the framework does not value the ability to set any end, but rather the ability to decide which ends to pursue
45		-Ripstein 9 2, Arthur. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts . London, England 2009. NP 8/4/16.
46		-Independence is the
47		-AND
48		-right to independence
49		-
50		-Prefer additionally:
51		-Only a Kantian framework makes public education coherent – no public educational institutions can be free from the constraints of the omnilateral will.
52		-Ripstein 9 3. (Arthur Ripstein is a professor of law and of philosophy at the University of Toronto. He was appointed to the Department of Philosophy in 1987) Force and Freedom Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy Arthur Ripstein. Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts . London, England 2009. NP 2/12/17.
53		-The impossibility of
54		-AND
55		-protect their freedom.
56		-
57		-First, public universities and colleges are founded and operated by the state.
58		-Collegebound “Differences Between Public and Private Universities and Liberal Arts Colleges” http://www.collegebound.net/content/article/differences-between-public-and-private-universities-and-liberal-arts-colleges/18529/ JW
59		-In the US,
60		-AND
61		-into comprehensive universities.
62		-
63		-Public officials must make laws consistent with their inner standard of consistency – i.e. the constitution. Otherwise, the sovereign is in a place of contradiction with itself.
64		-Ripstein 9 4. (Arthur Ripstein is a professor of law and of philosophy at the University of Toronto. He was appointed to the Department of Philosophy in 1987) Force and Freedom Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy Arthur Ripstein. Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts . London, England 2009. Page 201-203. NP 2/12/17.
65		-The idea of
66		-AND
67		-of inner consistency.
68		-
69		-Second, laws are only legitimate if individuals could agree to impose them on themselves. One could not agree to a condition of enforceable passivity where freedom of expression is abrogated – it would undermine rightful honor.
70		-Ripstein 9 5. (Arthur Ripstein is a professor of law and of philosophy at the University of Toronto. He was appointed to the Department of Philosophy in 1987) Force and Freedom Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy Arthur Ripstein. Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts . London, England 2009. NP 2/12/17.
71		-Innate right has
72		-AND
73		-their rightful honor.
74		-
75		-Third, freedom of expression is a necessary component of your status as a person and an entitlement of right – protected speech can not wrong others
76		-Ripstein 9 6. (Arthur Ripstein is a professor of law and of philosophy at the University of Toronto. He was appointed to the Department of Philosophy in 1987) Force and Freedom Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy Arthur Ripstein. Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts . London, England 2009. NP 2/12/17.
77		-Instead of advantage,
78		-AND
79		-arrangements with you.
80		-
81		-Fourth, censorship of criticism of the ruler’s political opinions would undermine their power and legitimacy
82		-David 83 summarizes and quotes Kant 1. KANTS FOURTH DEFENSE OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION1 Michael Davis (Illinois State University, Michael Davis is a member of the Philosophy Department of Illinois State University, having received his Ph. D. from the University of Michigan. His research interests include social contract theory (where the contract is actual, not hypothetical), standards for just punishment, and morality as the work of a “moral legislature.”) March 1983. NP 2/13/17. bracketed for gendered language
83		-“The citizen must,”
84		-AND
85		-and self-assurance.
86		-
87		-Fifth, censorship is inconsistent with the initial foundation of right and leads to contradiction with the basis for the government’s power
88		-David 83 summarizes and quotes Kant 2. KANTS FOURTH DEFENSE OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION1 Michael Davis (Illinois State University, Michael Davis is a member of the Philosophy Department of Illinois State University, having received his Ph. D. from the University of Michigan. His research interests include social contract theory (where the contract is actual, not hypothetical), standards for just punishment, and morality as the work of a “moral legislature.”) March 1983. NP 2/13/17. bracketed for gendered language
89		-What is the
90		-AND
91		-his subjects’ rationality.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2017-02-16 19:18:23.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Paloma OConnor, Joey Schnide

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Jack Wareham

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-33

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Hunter College Potischman Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-JAN FEB AC Kant

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Harvard RR