Changes for page Hunter College Potischman Aff
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:36
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,0 @@ 1 -A: IF the negative debater claims that the affirmative debater should lose for reading a utilitarian framework, they must read a competing comprehensive moral theory that explains how we ought to take action in all circumstances. To clarify – the standard may not say that certain things are bad, it must provide a metric for determining what is good and bad. 2 - 3 -A: Neg must disclose all topicality interpretations on the NDCA wiki at least an hour before the round. 4 - 5 -A: If the negative debater reads topicality, claims that topicality outweighs theory, reads offense under the aff framework, and a kritik of the aff’s view of debate, they must defend the K unconditionally. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-09-17 20:21:18.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Hunter College Potischman Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - Theory Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All