Changes for page Hunter College Potischman Aff
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:36
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[4]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-09-17 20:21:17. 6721 +2016-09-17 20:21:17.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,5 @@ 1 +A: IF the negative debater claims that the affirmative debater should lose for reading a utilitarian framework, they must read a competing comprehensive moral theory that explains how we ought to take action in all circumstances. To clarify – the standard may not say that certain things are bad, it must provide a metric for determining what is good and bad. 2 + 3 +A: Neg must disclose all topicality interpretations on the NDCA wiki at least an hour before the round. 4 + 5 +A: If the negative debater reads topicality, claims that topicality outweighs theory, reads offense under the aff framework, and a kritik of the aff’s view of debate, they must defend the K unconditionally. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-09-17 20:21:18.535 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hunter College Potischman Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - Theory Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All