Changes for page Hunter College Frankel Aff
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 15 added, 0 removed)
- Caselist.RoundClass[0]
- Caselist.CitesClass[0]
- Caselist.CitesClass[1]
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
- Caselist.CitesClass[3]
- Caselist.CitesClass[4]
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
- Caselist.CitesClass[6]
- Caselist.CitesClass[7]
- Caselist.RoundClass[1]
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
- Caselist.RoundClass[3]
- Caselist.RoundClass[4]
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
- Caselist.RoundClass[6]
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[0]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-09-17 16:2 4:03.8371 +2016-09-17 16:27:57.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[0]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,38 @@ 1 +I affirm. 2 +Negating an ought-statement means proving a prohibition. 3 +Oxford Dictionary 8 Oxford American Large Print Dictionary 2008 edited by McKean defines negation of an ought statement. (Oxford University Press Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide) Oxford Print Dictionary Published 2008. Eric McKean. NP 10/14/15. 4 +usage: The verb ought is...for expressing suitability or appropriateness. 5 +I affirm the resolution as a general principle. 6 +Lucas 12 clarifies Caroline Lucas is a British politican and environmental activist, "Why we must phase out nuclear power," https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/17/phase-out-nuclear-power. //hchs-TF 7 +The only certain way to..phase out of nuclear power. 8 +Next— 9 +Foundationism fails—there are no infallible basic beliefs; it leads to infinite regression 10 +Bonjour 78 Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation? Author(s): Laurence Bonjour Source: American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Jan., 1978), pp. 1-13 Published by: University of Illinois Press on behalf of the North American Philosophical Publications Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20009690. NP 8/25/15. 11 +The fundamental concept of strong...the concept of epistemic justification. 12 +Looking to regulative epistemology rather than preoccupation with grounding truth is most productive. 13 +Woods and Roberts 2 Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology 2010 14 +The triviality of standard epistemology’s...with the enterprise of education. 15 +It’s impractical to analytically derive moral truths in certain cases—we must recognize cognitive limitations and epistemic authority of those who have better understanding. 16 +Woods and Roberts 3 Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology 2010. //hchs-TF 17 +Thomas Reid pointed out that...promoting warrant in testimony circumstances. 18 +Those with most experience have a better chance of acting correctly. 19 +Ibekwe 13 Ibekwe, Henry. Virtue Ethics: a justification on the basis of Neurophilosophy and Neuroscience. http://www.academia.edu/4312677/Virtue_Ethics_a_justification_on_the_basis_of_Neurophilosophy_and_Neuroscience. April 4th, 2013. NP 8/25/15. 20 +An epistemological puzzle arising from...true from a neuroscientific perspective. 21 +Thus, the standard is appealing to epistemically qualified authorities. 22 +Prefer: 23 +1) We cannot wait till we have the right ethical method, otherwise we could not even be confident that studying ethics is ethical. Instead we must recognize authority of those better situated in moral understanding. 24 +Gadamer 60 Hans-Georg Gadamer Sick philosopher, pun intended. “Truth and Method”. 1960. 25 +The Enlightenment's distinction between faith...on the indispensability of tradition. 26 +Contention 27 +Pope Francis has presented examples to billions with acts of justice. 28 +Obama 14 TIME 100 ICONS Pope Francis By Barack Obama April 23, 2014. Time Magazine. 29 +Rare is the leader who...we heed his humble example. 30 +Pope Francis affirms. 31 +Onsman 15 Ricky Onsman. "Pope Francis Calls Nuclear Power Plants a Modern-Day Tower of Babel." Helen Caldicott, MD. www.helencaldicott.com/pope-francis-calls-nuclear-power-plants-a-modern-day-tower-of-babel/. DL 32 +In an audience with Japanese...from the government the immediate 33 +Bernie Sanders also supports a ban on the production of nuclear power. 34 +Adler 16 Ben Adler. "Bernie Sanders wants to Phase out Nuclear Power." Mother Jones. April 5, 2016. www.motherjones.com/environment/2016/04/grist-bernie-sanders-wants-to-phase-out-nuclear-power-plants. DL 35 +You've probably heard that Bernie...caricature that his critics describe. 36 +Bernie Sanders is a moral authority: he is unwavering in his morality, even when they come at personal cost, refusing Super PACS, criticizing private interest and big business—representing the people. 37 +West 15 Dr. Cornel West. August 24, 2015. Facebook post. https://www.facebook.com/drcornelwest/posts/10155953989390111. DL 38 +Why I Endorse Brother Bernie...vision of freedom for all. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-09-17 16:27:59.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Wesley Hu - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Montville RU - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hunter College Frankel Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +so ~-~- 1ac ~-~- testimony - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Yale
- Caselist.CitesClass[1]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,38 @@ 1 +I affirm. 2 +Negating an ought-statement means proving a prohibition. 3 +Oxford Dictionary 8 Oxford American Large Print Dictionary 2008 edited by McKean defines negation of an ought statement. (Oxford University Press Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide) Oxford Print Dictionary Published 2008. Eric McKean. NP 10/14/15. 4 +usage: The verb ought is...for expressing suitability or appropriateness. 5 +I affirm the resolution as a general principle. 6 +Lucas 12 clarifies Caroline Lucas is a British politican and environmental activist, "Why we must phase out nuclear power," https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/17/phase-out-nuclear-power. //hchs-TF 7 +The only certain way to..phase out of nuclear power. 8 +Next— 9 +Foundationism fails—there are no infallible basic beliefs; it leads to infinite regression 10 +Bonjour 78 Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation? Author(s): Laurence Bonjour Source: American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Jan., 1978), pp. 1-13 Published by: University of Illinois Press on behalf of the North American Philosophical Publications Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20009690. NP 8/25/15. 11 +The fundamental concept of strong...the concept of epistemic justification. 12 +Looking to regulative epistemology rather than preoccupation with grounding truth is most productive. 13 +Woods and Roberts 2 Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology 2010 14 +The triviality of standard epistemology’s...with the enterprise of education. 15 +It’s impractical to analytically derive moral truths in certain cases—we must recognize cognitive limitations and epistemic authority of those who have better understanding. 16 +Woods and Roberts 3 Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology 2010. //hchs-TF 17 +Thomas Reid pointed out that...promoting warrant in testimony circumstances. 18 +Those with most experience have a better chance of acting correctly. 19 +Ibekwe 13 Ibekwe, Henry. Virtue Ethics: a justification on the basis of Neurophilosophy and Neuroscience. http://www.academia.edu/4312677/Virtue_Ethics_a_justification_on_the_basis_of_Neurophilosophy_and_Neuroscience. April 4th, 2013. NP 8/25/15. 20 +An epistemological puzzle arising from...true from a neuroscientific perspective. 21 +Thus, the standard is appealing to epistemically qualified authorities. 22 +Prefer: 23 +1) We cannot wait till we have the right ethical method, otherwise we could not even be confident that studying ethics is ethical. Instead we must recognize authority of those better situated in moral understanding. 24 +Gadamer 60 Hans-Georg Gadamer Sick philosopher, pun intended. “Truth and Method”. 1960. 25 +The Enlightenment's distinction between faith...on the indispensability of tradition. 26 +Contention 27 +Bernie Sanders supports a ban on the production of nuclear power. 28 +Adler 16 Ben Adler. "Bernie Sanders wants to Phase out Nuclear Power." Mother Jones. April 5, 2016. www.motherjones.com/environment/2016/04/grist-bernie-sanders-wants-to-phase-out-nuclear-power-plants. DL 29 +You've probably heard that Bernie...caricature that his critics describe. 30 +Bernie Sanders is a moral authority: he is unwavering in his morality, even when they come at personal cost, refusing Super PACS, criticizing private interest and big business—representing the people. 31 +West 15 Dr. Cornel West. August 24, 2015. Facebook post. https://www.facebook.com/drcornelwest/posts/10155953989390111. DL 32 +Why I Endorse Brother Bernie...vision of freedom for all. 33 +Winona LaDuke affirms: 34 +Parker 8 Melody Parker. "Winona LaDuke: The Struggle For Environmental Justice." May 22, 2008. City On A Hill Press. www.cityonahillpress.com/2008/05/22/winona-laduke-the-struggle-for-environmental-justice/ 35 +Winona LaDuke stopped by last...of us, human and nonhuman.” 36 +She's a moral authority. 37 +Schilling 14 Vincent Schilling. "Fight the power: 8 Contemporary Heroes and Leaders of Native Resistance." October 22, 2014. Indian Country. indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2014/10/22/fight-power-8-contemporary-heroes-and-leaders-native-resistance-157459?page=02C1 38 +A former Green Party vice-presidential...life’s contributions to Indian country. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-09-17 16:32:29.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Becca Traber - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Syosset AM - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hunter College Frankel Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +so ~-~- 1ac ~-~- testimony v2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Yale
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,63 @@ 1 +Nuclear power is a national project that organizes all the forces of the country into an enormous factory for the extension of technological enframing, the culmination of western metaphysics that reduces all of humans and nature into standing reserve. Nuclear power organizes the entirety of the world picture as it colonizes culture, politics, and discourse. 2 +Kinsella 7 William J. Kinsella, associate professor in the Department of Communication at North Carolina State University. “Heidegger and Being at the Hanford Reservation: Standing Reserve, Enframing, and Environmental Communication Theory”, Environmental Communication, Vol. 1, No. 2, November 2007 hchs-TF 3 +To further illustrate the implications 4 +AND 5 +and constituted in mutual relation. 6 + 7 +The impact is disposability—nuclear power destroys our value to life by rendering the universe a standing reserve that culminates in the wholesale destruction of the environment and other humans. 8 +Beckman 2k Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, 2000 Tad, Harvey Mudd College, Martin Heidegger and Environmental Ethics, page @ http://www2.hmc.edu/~tbeckman/personal/HEIDART.HTML hchs-TF 9 +The threat of nuclear annihilation 10 +AND 11 +of a more primal truth. 12 + 13 +Thus, I affirm Resolved: Countries ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power. I reserve the right to clarify. 14 + 15 +“Resolved” means to become aware of our own being. 16 +Pezze 6 (Barbara, 2006 PhD Philosophy at Honk Kong U, “Heidegger on Gelassenheit”, Minerva, vol .10, http://www.ul.ie/~philos/vol10/Heidegger.html hchs-hchs-TF 17 +Let us pause for a 18 +AND 19 +Gegnet conceals and unconceals itself? 20 + 21 +The 1AC’s reading of the resolution opens up feelings of anxiety towards enframing. 22 +Magrini 6 James Magrini prof. of Phil. @ the College of DuPage “"Anxiety" in Heidegger's Being and Time: The Harbinger of Authenticity” Philosophy Scholarship. Paper 15. hchs-TF 23 +To initiate authentic Being-in-the world, a 24 +AND 25 +action in a particular Situation" 26 + 27 +Radical questioning and rejecting technological enframing opens new possibilities. 28 +Smith 91 (Gregory, Department of Poly Sci @ Univ. of Michigan, "Heidegger, Technology, and Postmodernity," Social Science Journal, Vol 28, Issue 3, p. ebscohost) hchs-TF 29 +In the modern understanding, modern 30 +AND 31 +consequences is set in motion. 32 + 33 +Anxiety is crucial to actualize being in the world. 34 +Critchley 9 6 July 2009 Simon Critchley currently teaches philosophy at The New School in New York “Being and Time, part 5: Anxiety” http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/jul/06/heidegger-philosophy-being hchs-TF 35 +Anxiety does not need darkness 36 +AND 37 +is individualised and becomes self-aware. 38 + 39 +The illusion of choosing how we engage with knowledge is a myth of humanism that keeps us entrenched in technological modes of thinking. We have no choice in how the world is revealed, only in how we are. The aff is critical to break through the deadlock of western metaphysics. 40 +Sawicki 3 Ph.D. Columbia University, Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies, Chair of Women's And Gender Studies, Williams College (Jana, “Foucault and Heidegger Critical Encounters”, Heidegger and Foucault:Escaping Technological Nihilism, University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis London, Questia hchs-TF 41 +Who accomplishes the challenging setting 42 +AND 43 +therefore subject to human control. 44 + 45 +Thus, the role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who provides the best methodology for preserving being-in-the-world. That means that you should evaluate ontological questions prior to any other concerns. 46 + 47 +The role of the ballot ruptures traditional modes of education that stress the optimization of efficiency. 48 +Thomson 5 Iain, Professor of Philosophy University of New Mexico. “Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education.” Cambridge University Press, 2005 hchs-TF 49 +This Nietzschean ontotheology not only 50 +AND 51 +revitalizing reunification of the university. 52 + 53 +Attempting to externalize ourselves from our beliefs and outsourcing responsibility creates passivism and self-hatred. 54 +Antonio 95 Robert J Antonio, PhD in sociology, professor of sociology at the University of Kansas, July 1995, “Nietzsche’s Antisociology: Subjectified Culture and the End of History,” American Journal of Sociology Volume 101 Number 1 hchs-TF 55 +According to Nietzsche, the "subject" 56 +AND 57 +a new type of tyrant. 58 + 59 +Every question is always already ontological—inquiry that doesn’t begin with the question of being-in-the-world is violently appropriated. 60 +Dillon 99 Dillon Prof of Politics at Lancaster 1999 Michael Political Theory 27.2 jstor hchs-TF 61 +Because you cannot say anything 62 +AND 63 +question of the political itself. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-24 23:11:54.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Ana Calizo, Raul Larsen, Allan Xu - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Success Academy SC - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Semis - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hunter College Frankel Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +so ~-~- 1ac ~-~- nuclear anxiety - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Beltway
- Caselist.CitesClass[3]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,52 @@ 1 +I affirm Resolved: Countries ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power. I value morality. 2 + 3 +Questioning a constitutive obligation can be no more than questioning whether or not you belong to that category. 4 +Surgener 11 (Kirk Surgener, Neo-Kantian Constructivism in Metaethics. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/3298/1/Surgener12PhD.pdf 2011.) hchs-TF 5 +Constitutivism tries to ground the 6 +AND 7 +system of distribution at all. 8 + 9 +Thus, the standard is maintaining a system of equal freedom. 10 + 11 +Contention One is Structural Violence 12 +Subpoint A: Exploitation 13 +The nuclear power production industry exploits and lies to workers whose capacity to set ends is already minimal—as a result they face tragic health consequences. 14 +Shrader-Frechette 9 (Mary, Kristen (Alldred is a doctoral student of ecology and evolution at the State University of New York at Stony Brook, in Stony Brook, New York. Dr. Shrader-Frechette is O’Neill Fam- ily Endowed Professor, Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Philosophy, and Director of the Center for Envi- ronmental Justice and Children’s Health, all at the University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana) “Environmental Injustice in Sitting Nuclear Plants,” Environmental Justice Vol 2 Number 2009.) MR 8/8/16 15 +In stages (2)–(5) of the nuclear fuel 16 +AND 17 +occupational-radiation dose of 50 mSv. 18 + 19 +The nuclear industry intentionally covers up these incidents in order to continue to curb worker’s abilities to set their own ends. 20 +Cousins et al. n.d. (Cousins, Elicia Researcher, Carleton College, Claire Karban, Fay Li, and Marianna Zapanta. “Nuclear Power and Environmental Justice.” Carleton College, Environmental Studies Comprehensive Project.) hchs-TF 21 +Those who experience a nuclear 22 +AND 23 +evacuee from the Chernobyl zone: 24 + 25 +Subpoint B: Indigenous Communities 26 +The nuclear industry’s treatment of Native American land violates their freedom. 27 +Brook 98 (Daniel, “Environmental Genocide: Native Americans and Toxic Waste,” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology Vol 57 No 1 January 1998 https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-20538772/environmental-genocide-native-americans-and-toxic.) MR 8/11/16 28 + 29 +But, regulations fail—a ban is the only way to mitigate the harms. 30 +Ross 11 (Ross, Timothy J. Professor of Civil Engineering, University of New Mexico “Avoiding Apocalypse: Congress Should Ban Nuclear Power.” UB Law.) hchs-TF 31 +There have, over the years 32 +AND 33 +that of the general public. 34 + 35 +Contention Two is Future Generations 36 +Nuclear power harms the natural environment at the expense of future generations, while privileging current ones. 37 +Rendall 7 (Rendall, Matthew, professor at the School of Politics and International Relations at The University of Nottingham. "Nuclear Weapons and Intergenerational Exploitation," 2007.) hchs-TF 38 +Intergenerational justice deals with our 39 +AND 40 +activities prior to the accident.” 41 + 42 +The negative impacts of nuclear power outweigh negative impacts of any other form of power production—there is NO WAY to effectively store waste. 43 +Coplan 8 (Karl S. Coplan, (Professor Karl S. Coplan has been a Professor and Associate Professor of Law at Pace Law School and Co-Director of its Environmental Litigation Clinic since 1994. Prior to joining the Pace faculty, he practiced land use and environmental litigation for eight years with the New York City firm of Berle, Kass and Case. ) The Externalities of Nuclear Power: First, Assume We Have a Can Opener . . ., 35 Ecology L. Currents 17 (2008), http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/489/.) NP 8/8/16. 44 +While the impacts of global 45 +AND 46 +are comparable, and longer lasting. 47 + 48 +Nuclear phase out fosters investment in renewables—compensates for the costs of foregoing nuclear power. 49 +De Cian et al. 12 (Innovation benefits from nuclear phase-out: can they compensate the costs? Enrica De Cian, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) and Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (CMCC) Samuel Carrara, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) and Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (CMCC) Massimo Tavoni, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) and Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (CMCC). Nota di Lavoro. 2012.) NP 50 +Our results show that phasing 51 +AND 52 +regional distribution of technology benefits. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-25 22:06:53.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tiffany Dacheux - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Randolph AP - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hunter College Frankel Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +so ~-~- 1ac ~-~- ripstein - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Beltway
- Caselist.CitesClass[4]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,89 @@ 1 +===Framework=== 2 +The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best methodologically resists oppression. Debates should be over what to do about oppression, not what constitutes oppression. 3 +Curry 14, Dr. Tommy J. Curry (Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Texas AandM), “The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century”, Victory Briefs, 2014. 4 +Despite the pronouncement of debate 5 +AND 6 +our ideological tendencies and politics. 7 + 8 +And, the material conditions of violence should come first. 9 +Pappas 16. Gregory Fernando Pappas 16, Texas AandM University, “The Pragmatists’ Approach to Injustice”, The Pluralist Volume 11, Number 1, Spring 2016. 10 +Thus an empirical inquiry about 11 +AND 12 +unique circumstances of each injustice. 13 + 14 +===Harms=== 15 +Speech codes operate from a flawed starting point by putting faith in school administrations to determine what speech is good. 16 +Gates 94 Henry Louis “Skip” Gates Jr, Speaking of Race, Speaking of Sex: Hate Speech, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties, pg. 41-42. NYU Press, 1994. hchs-TF 17 +And yet there is something 18 +AND 19 +to authority and its institutions. 20 + 21 +Because of this, speech codes end up targeting the individuals they’re supposed to help. 22 +Friedersdorf 15 Conor Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he focuses on politics and national affairs. He lives in Venice, California, and is the founding editor of The Best of Journalism, a newsletter devoted to exceptional nonfiction. “The Glaring Evidence That Free Speech Is Threatened on Campus,” The Atlantic, March 4, 2016. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/03/the-glaring-evidence-that-free-speech-is-threatened-on-campus/471825/). hchs-TF 23 +He was writing after the 24 +AND 25 +or on behalf of blacks.” 26 + 27 +And, even if restrictions on hateful speech seem good now, they spill over and block more productive forms of dialogue in the future. 28 +Strossen 1 Nadine, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008; Professor of Law, New York Law School, “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990. hchs-TF 29 +Second, there is an inescapable 30 +AND 31 +the first amendment's moral legitimacy.190 32 + 33 +Meanwhile, present restrictions on speech do nothing to stop bigotry on campus, and only radicalize racists disguised as the “alt-right.” 34 +Carle 16 Robert Carle, professor of theology at The King's College in Manhattan, December 22nd, 2016, "How The American Academy Helped Create The Alt-Right", The Federalist, http://thefederalist.com/2016/12/22/american-academy-helped-create-alt-right/ hchs-TF 35 +American academics are rightly alarmed 36 +AND 37 +cease to live in freedom. 38 + 39 +Worse, censorship makes hypervisible and glorifies the very same oppressors it tries to prevent. 40 +Strossen 2 Nadine, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008; Professor of Law, New York Law School, “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990. hchs-TF 41 +A second reason why censorship 42 +AND 43 +as martyrs or even heroes. 44 + 45 +Thus, the advocacy: Public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. 46 + 47 +===Solvency=== 48 +Deregulating speech establishes the necessary precedent for social movements and change. 49 +ACLU 16. 2016 "Hate Speech on Campus" https://www.aclu.org/other/hate-speech-campus. DL. 50 +Free speech rights are indivisible. 51 +AND 52 +United States are thereby weakened." 53 + 54 +And, counterspeech is a better method than speech codes— 55 +a. Counterspeech allows for self-determination and causes changes in communities. 56 +Calleros 95 Charles R. Calleros, Professor of Law, Arizona State University, “Paternalism, Counterspeech, and Campus Hate-Speech Codes: A Reply to Delgado and Yun,” 1995 Arizona State Law Journal; Arizona State Law Journal, Winter, 1995 27 Ariz. St. L.J. 1249 hchs-TF 57 +Delgado and Yun summarize the 58 +AND 59 +not suppression but rather counterspeech. 60 +b. Psychological studies prove counterspeech is effective. 61 +Strossen 3 Nadine, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008; Professor of Law, New York Law School, “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990. hchs-TF 62 +A study that was done 63 +AND 64 +not suppression but rather counterspeech. 65 +c. Agonistic pluralism is good. 66 +Wingenbach 11 (Ed, Notre Dame Government and international studies PhD, “Institutionalizing Agonistic Democracy,” pg 190-198, https://books.google.com/books?id=7-8JrC64UgwCandprintsec=frontcover) 67 +Third, because Knops ignores the 68 +AND 69 +contestation, generosity, and active re-constitution. 70 + 71 +===Underview=== 72 +The aff’s political method is good— 73 +The state is inevitable—speaking the language of power through policymaking is the only way to create social change in debate. 74 +Coverstone 5 Alan Coverstone (masters in communication from Wake Forest, longtime debate coach) “Acting on Activism: Realizing the Vision of Debate with Pro-social Impact” Paper presented at the National Communication Association Annual Conference November 17th 2005 75 +An important concern emerges when 76 +AND 77 +governmental power at some point. 78 + 79 +Any alternative inverts the error. 80 +Krause and Williams 97 Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases, edited and introduced by Keith Krause, a Canadian political scientist known for his work on international security and armed violence, and Michael Williams, PhD, the Johanna K. and Martin J. Wyngaarden Senior Professor in Old Testament Studies at Calvin Theological Seminary and a member of the NIV Committee on Bible Translation. Published 1997. Pages xvi-xvii. hchs-TF 81 +First, to stand too far 82 +AND 83 +actor in contemporary world politics. 84 + 85 +Government-as-heuristic is not an abstraction, but rather provides a means of understanding the state and breaking it down. 86 +Zanotti 14. Dr. Laura Zanotti is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Virginia Tech. Her research and teaching include critical political theory as well as international organizations, UN peacekeeping, democratization and the role of NGOs in post-conflict governance.“Governmentality, Ontology, Methodology: Re-thinking Political Agency in the Global World” – Alternatives: Global, Local, Political – vol 38(4):p. 288-304,. A little unclear if this is late 2013 or early 2014 – The Stated “Version of Record” is Feb 20, 2014, but was originally published online on December 30th, 2013. 87 +By questioning substantialist representations of 88 +AND 89 +but to hyper- and pessimistic activism.’’84 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-18 05:21:35.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Ben Koh - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stuyvesant KL - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hunter College Frankel Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +jf ~-~- 1ac ~-~- oppression - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Penn
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,95 @@ 1 +===Part 1 is Framework=== 2 +The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best methodologically resists oppression. Debates should be over what to do about oppression, not what constitutes oppression. 3 +Curry 14, Dr. Tommy J. Curry (Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Texas AandM), “The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century”, Victory Briefs, 2014. 4 +Despite the pronouncement of debate 5 +AND 6 +our ideological tendencies and politics. 7 + 8 +And, the assumption that historically oppressive institutions will alter how they act is an unrealistic ideal that hinders concrete solutions to structural violence. 9 +Curry 13. Dr. Tommy J. Curry (Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Texas AandM), "In the Fiat of Dreams: The Delusional Allure of Hope, the Reality of Anti-Black Violence and the Demands of the Anti-Ethical", 2013. hchs-TF 10 +In ethical deliberations dealing with 11 +AND 12 +etc. makes them (whites) virtuous. 13 + 14 +===Part 2 is Harms=== 15 +Speech codes operate from a flawed starting point by putting faith in school administrations to determine what speech is good. 16 +Gates 94 Henry Louis “Skip” Gates Jr, Speaking of Race, Speaking of Sex: Hate Speech, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties, pg. 41-42. NYU Press, 1994. hchs-TF 17 +And yet there is something 18 +AND 19 +to authority and its institutions. 20 + 21 +Because of this, speech codes end up targeting the individuals they’re supposed to help. 22 +Friedersdorf 15 Conor Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he focuses on politics and national affairs. He lives in Venice, California, and is the founding editor of The Best of Journalism, a newsletter devoted to exceptional nonfiction. “The Glaring Evidence That Free Speech Is Threatened on Campus,” The Atlantic, March 4, 2016. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/03/the-glaring-evidence-that-free-speech-is-threatened-on-campus/471825/). hchs-TF 23 +He was writing after the 24 +AND 25 +or on behalf of blacks.” 26 + 27 +And, even if restrictions on hateful speech seem good now, they spill over and block more productive forms of dialogue in the future. 28 +Strossen 1 Nadine, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008; Professor of Law, New York Law School, “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990. hchs-TF 29 +Second, there is an inescapable 30 +AND 31 +the first amendment's moral legitimacy.190 32 + 33 +Meanwhile, present restrictions on speech do nothing to stop bigotry on campus, and only radicalize racists disguised as the “alt-right.” 34 +Carle 16 Robert Carle, professor of theology at The King's College in Manhattan, December 22nd, 2016, "How The American Academy Helped Create The Alt-Right", The Federalist, http://thefederalist.com/2016/12/22/american-academy-helped-create-alt-right/ hchs-TF 35 +American academics are rightly alarmed 36 +AND 37 +cease to live in freedom. 38 + 39 +Worse, censorship makes hypervisible and glorifies the very same oppressors it tries to prevent. 40 +Strossen 2 Nadine, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008; Professor of Law, New York Law School, “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990. hchs-TF 41 +A second reason why censorship 42 +AND 43 +as martyrs or even heroes. 44 + 45 +Thus, the advocacy: Public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. 46 + 47 +===Part 3 is Solvency=== 48 +Deregulating speech establishes the necessary precedent for social movements and change. 49 +ACLU 16. 2016 "Hate Speech on Campus" https://www.aclu.org/other/hate-speech-campus. DL. 50 +Free speech rights are indivisible. 51 +AND 52 +United States are thereby weakened." 53 + 54 +And, counterspeech is a better method than speech codes— 55 +a. Counterspeech allows for self-determination and causes changes in communities. 56 +Calleros 95 Charles R. Calleros, Professor of Law, Arizona State University, “Paternalism, Counterspeech, and Campus Hate-Speech Codes: A Reply to Delgado and Yun,” 1995 Arizona State Law Journal; Arizona State Law Journal, Winter, 1995 27 Ariz. St. L.J. 1249 hchs-TF 57 +Delgado and Yun summarize the 58 +AND 59 +not suppression but rather counterspeech. 60 +b. Psychological studies prove counterspeech is effective. 61 +Strossen 3 Nadine, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008; Professor of Law, New York Law School, “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990. hchs-TF 62 +A study that was done 63 +AND 64 +not suppression but rather counterspeech. 65 +c. Agonistic pluralism is good. 66 +Wingenbach 11 (Ed, Notre Dame Government and international studies PhD, “Institutionalizing Agonistic Democracy,” pg 190-198, https://books.google.com/books?id=7-8JrC64UgwCandprintsec=frontcover) 67 +Third, because Knops ignores the 68 +AND 69 +contestation, generosity, and active re-constitution. 70 + 71 +===Part 4 is Framing=== 72 +The aff’s political method is good— 73 +The state is inevitable—speaking the language of power through policymaking is the only way to create social change in debate. 74 +Coverstone 5 Alan Coverstone (masters in communication from Wake Forest, longtime debate coach) “Acting on Activism: Realizing the Vision of Debate with Pro-social Impact” Paper presented at the National Communication Association Annual Conference November 17th 2005 75 +An important concern emerges when 76 +AND 77 +governmental power at some point. 78 + 79 +Any alternative inverts the error. 80 +Krause and Williams 97 Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases, edited and introduced by Keith Krause, a Canadian political scientist known for his work on international security and armed violence, and Michael Williams, PhD, the Johanna K. and Martin J. Wyngaarden Senior Professor in Old Testament Studies at Calvin Theological Seminary and a member of the NIV Committee on Bible Translation. Published 1997. Pages xvi-xvii. hchs-TF 81 +First, to stand too far 82 +AND 83 +actor in contemporary world politics. 84 + 85 +Government-as-heuristic is not an abstraction, but rather provides a means of understanding the state and breaking it down. 86 +Zanotti 14. Dr. Laura Zanotti is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Virginia Tech. Her research and teaching include critical political theory as well as international organizations, UN peacekeeping, democratization and the role of NGOs in post-conflict governance.“Governmentality, Ontology, Methodology: Re-thinking Political Agency in the Global World” – Alternatives: Global, Local, Political – vol 38(4):p. 288-304,. A little unclear if this is late 2013 or early 2014 – The Stated “Version of Record” is Feb 20, 2014, but was originally published online on December 30th, 2013. 87 +By questioning substantialist representations of 88 +AND 89 +but to hyper- and pessimistic activism.’’84 90 + 91 +Simulated legal debates are good. 92 +Klare 11. Karl Klare, George J. and Kathleen Waters Matthews Distinguished University Professor, Northeastern University School of Law, “Teaching Local 1330—Reflections on Critical Legal Pedagogy.” School of Law Faculty Publications. Paper 167. http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20002528 93 +This dialogue continues for awhile. 94 +AND 95 +public, and conduct political consciousness-raising. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-18 05:25:58.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Heaven Montague - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harrison LC - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hunter College Frankel Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +jf ~-~- 1ac ~-~- oppression v2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Penn
- Caselist.CitesClass[6]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,95 @@ 1 +===Part 1 is Framework=== 2 +The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best methodologically resists oppression. Debates should be over what to do about oppression, not what constitutes oppression. 3 +Curry 14, Dr. Tommy J. Curry (Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Texas AandM), “The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century”, Victory Briefs, 2014. 4 +Despite the pronouncement of debate 5 +AND 6 +our ideological tendencies and politics. 7 + 8 +And, the assumption that historically oppressive institutions will alter how they act is an unrealistic ideal that hinders concrete solutions to structural violence. 9 +Curry 13. Dr. Tommy J. Curry (Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Texas AandM), "In the Fiat of Dreams: The Delusional Allure of Hope, the Reality of Anti-Black Violence and the Demands of the Anti-Ethical", 2013. hchs-TF 10 +In ethical deliberations dealing with 11 +AND 12 +etc. makes them (whites) virtuous. 13 + 14 +Ethical frameworks that abstract away from concrete social conditions are violently appropriated—ethics must be conscious of current deficits in society. 15 +Butler 5, Judith. Giving an Account of Oneself. Fordham University Press. 2005. NP 10/11/15 16 +I would like to begin 17 +AND 18 +appropriated, that ethos becomes violent. 19 + 20 +===Part 2 is Harms=== 21 +Speech codes operate from a flawed starting point by putting faith in school administrations to determine what speech is good. 22 +Gates 94 Henry Louis “Skip” Gates Jr, Speaking of Race, Speaking of Sex: Hate Speech, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties, pg. 41-42. NYU Press, 1994. hchs-TF 23 +And yet there is something 24 +AND 25 +to authority and its institutions. 26 + 27 +Because of this, speech codes end up targeting the individuals they’re supposed to help. 28 +Friedersdorf 15 Conor Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he focuses on politics and national affairs. He lives in Venice, California, and is the founding editor of The Best of Journalism, a newsletter devoted to exceptional nonfiction. “The Glaring Evidence That Free Speech Is Threatened on Campus,” The Atlantic, March 4, 2016. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/03/the-glaring-evidence-that-free-speech-is-threatened-on-campus/471825/). hchs-TF 29 +He was writing after the 30 +AND 31 +or on behalf of blacks.” 32 + 33 +And, even if restrictions on hateful speech seem good now, they spill over and block more productive forms of dialogue in the future. 34 +Strossen 1 Nadine, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008; Professor of Law, New York Law School, “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990. hchs-TF 35 +Second, there is an inescapable 36 +AND 37 +the first amendment's moral legitimacy.190 38 + 39 +Meanwhile, present restrictions on speech do nothing to stop bigotry on campus, and only radicalize racists disguised as the “alt-right.” 40 +Carle 16 Robert Carle, professor of theology at The King's College in Manhattan, December 22nd, 2016, "How The American Academy Helped Create The Alt-Right", The Federalist, http://thefederalist.com/2016/12/22/american-academy-helped-create-alt-right/ hchs-TF 41 +American academics are rightly alarmed 42 +AND 43 +cease to live in freedom. 44 + 45 +Worse, censorship makes hypervisible and glorifies the very same oppressors it tries to prevent. 46 +Strossen 2 Nadine, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008; Professor of Law, New York Law School, “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990. hchs-TF 47 +A second reason why censorship 48 +AND 49 +as martyrs or even heroes. 50 + 51 +Thus, the advocacy: Public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. 52 + 53 +===Part 3 is Solvency=== 54 +Deregulating speech establishes the necessary precedent for social movements and change. 55 +ACLU 16. 2016 "Hate Speech on Campus" https://www.aclu.org/other/hate-speech-campus. DL. 56 +Free speech rights are indivisible. 57 +AND 58 +United States are thereby weakened." 59 + 60 +And, counterspeech is a better method than speech codes— 61 +a. Counterspeech allows for self-determination and causes changes in communities. 62 +Calleros 95 Charles R. Calleros, Professor of Law, Arizona State University, “Paternalism, Counterspeech, and Campus Hate-Speech Codes: A Reply to Delgado and Yun,” 1995 Arizona State Law Journal; Arizona State Law Journal, Winter, 1995 27 Ariz. St. L.J. 1249 hchs-TF 63 +Delgado and Yun summarize the 64 +AND 65 +not suppression but rather counterspeech. 66 +b. Psychological studies prove counterspeech is effective. 67 +Strossen 3 Nadine, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008; Professor of Law, New York Law School, “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990. hchs-TF 68 +A study that was done 69 +AND 70 +not suppression but rather counterspeech. 71 +c. Agonistic pluralism is good. 72 +Wingenbach 11 (Ed, Notre Dame Government and international studies PhD, “Institutionalizing Agonistic Democracy,” pg 190-198, https://books.google.com/books?id=7-8JrC64UgwCandprintsec=frontcover) 73 +Third, because Knops ignores the 74 +AND 75 +contestation, generosity, and active re-constitution. 76 + 77 +===Part 4 is the Underview=== 78 + 79 +1. Drop any neg T or theory argument run on the aff advocacy if it isn’t checked in CX: 80 +A. Analytic 81 +B. Analytic 82 + 83 +2. Aff gets 1ar theory and meta theory: 84 +A. Analytic 85 +B. Analytic 86 + 87 +3. Evaluate the round using a comparing worlds paradigm. Prefer: 88 +A. Analytic 89 +B. Analytic 90 + 91 +4. The state is inevitable—speaking the language of power through policymaking is the only way to create social change in debate. 92 +Coverstone 5 Alan Coverstone (masters in communication from Wake Forest, longtime debate coach) “Acting on Activism: Realizing the Vision of Debate with Pro-social Impact” Paper presented at the National Communication Association Annual Conference November 17th 2005 93 +An important concern emerges when 94 +AND 95 +governmental power at some point. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-18 14:44:13.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jason Smith - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Christopher Columbus AT - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hunter College Frankel Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +jf ~-~- 1ac ~-~- oppression v3 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard
- Caselist.CitesClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,116 @@ 1 +====Individuals have an innate right to independence, which guarantees that their ability to pursue an end is not contingent on the will of others. ==== 2 +**Ripstein**, Arthur. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Harvard University Press, 2009. 3 +This right to 4 +AND 5 +of personal freedom." 6 + 7 + 8 +====Thus, the standard is consistency with republican freedom as non-domination, which means adopting social and political institutions that eliminate the capacities for arbitrary interference. ==== 9 + 10 + 11 +====Impact Calc: A) The standard is not a question of maximizing non-interference, but pursuing structural conditions that make arbitrary political interference inaccessible. A roman slave with a benevolent master, is well off, but not free, since their freedom remains contingent on their master’s arbitrary whim. ==== 12 +**Pettit 1**, Philip. Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. OUP Oxford, 1997. DL 1.7.2017 13 +The republican view 14 +AND 15 +among the citizenry. 16 + 17 + 18 +====B) The relationship between the state and non-domination is constitutive, not causal. ==== 19 +**Pettit 2**, Philip. Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. OUP Oxford, 1997. DL 1.7.2017 20 +But though the 21 +AND 22 +of that term. 23 + 24 + 25 +====Prefer additionally:==== 26 + 27 + 28 +====A negative conception of freedom as non-interference can never explain the legitimacy of the state since state coercion could never cohere with freedom. ==== 29 +**Pettit 3.** Philip Pettit, ‘Legitimacy and Justice in Republican Perspective’, Inaugural Quain Lecture in Jurisprudence, 2012, in Current Legal Problems, Vol 65, 2012, 59-82; doi: 10.1093/clp/cus016. DL 1.7.16. 30 +One of the 31 +AND 32 +despotism or chaos’.31 33 + 34 + 35 +====This requires revising our conception of freedom; only the republican conception of freedom as non-domination, which targets arbitrary interference as opposed to all interference, satisfies the question of legitimacy. ==== 36 +**Pettit 4,** Philip Pettit, ‘Legitimacy and Justice in Republican Perspective’, Inaugural Quain Lecture in Jurisprudence, 2012, in Current Legal Problems, Vol 65, 2012, 59-82; doi: 10.1093/clp/cus016. DL 1.7.16. 37 +But while the 38 +AND 39 +than non-interference. 40 + 41 + 42 +====Freedom as non-domination is a primary good. ==== 43 +**Pettit 5,** Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. OUP Oxford, 1997. DL 1.7.2017 44 +The considerations rehearsed 45 +AND 46 +a primary good. 47 + 48 + 49 +==Contention 1: The Right to Free Speech == 50 + 51 + 52 +====Freedom to say what one wants is essential to be your own person and live your own life. ==== 53 +**Pettit 6,** Philip. Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. OUP Oxford, 1997. DL 1.7.2017 54 +But the primary‐good 55 +AND 56 +a primary good. 57 + 58 + 59 +====Thus, giving the state the power to restrict speech content makes one’s freedom contingent on the government. Speech codes on campus institutionally create the possibility of arbitrary interference of free speech – past cases prove it’s possible. ==== 60 +**ACLU 16,** ACLU. 2016 "Hate Speech on Campus" https://www.aclu.org/other/hate-speech-campus 61 +Historically, defamation laws 62 +AND 63 +we'll be next." 64 + 65 + 66 +====Takes out hate speech PICs: a) speech codes directed at reducing domination are illegitimate since they create new institutions of arbitrary state domination; b) turns the PIC: hate speech restrictions are used by school administrators to target student activists and minorities – not racists; c) outweighs – free speech on campus makes state domination inaccessible, but speech codes do nothing to reduce the structural capacity for racist interference. ==== 67 +**ACLU ~~2~~,** ACLU. 2016 "Hate Speech on Campus" https://www.aclu.org/other/hate-speech-campus 68 +Bigoted speech is 69 +AND 70 +of racist ideas. 71 + 72 + 73 +==Contention 2 Deliberation== 74 + 75 + 76 +====Arbitrary interference occurs without reference to an agent’s input or avowed interests.==== 77 +**Laborde and Maynor summarize Pettit**, Laborde, Cécile, and John Maynor, eds. Republicanism and political theory. John Wiley and Sons, 2009. Bracketted for gendered language. 78 +In his chapter, 79 +AND 80 +compromise republican freedom. 81 + 82 + 83 +====Thus, the self-governance required by non-domination depends on open deliberation. ==== 84 +**Febres summarizes Meiklejohn:** Power Febres, C. Liberalism, feminism and republicanism on freedom of speech: the cases of pornography and racist hate speech. Dissertation. UCL (University College London), 2011. APA. DL 1.7.17 85 +The republican conception 86 +AND 87 +the political process. 88 + 89 + 90 +====Free deliberation and dissent means speech restrictions are impermissible.==== 91 +**Sunstein 09,** Sunstein, Cass R. ~~Cass R. Sunstein is currently the Robert Walmsley University Professor at Harvard. From 2009 to 2012, he was Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. He is the founder and director of the Program on Behavioral Economics and Public Policy at Harvard Law School.~~ Republic. com 2.0. Princeton University Press, 2009. DL 1.6.17. 92 +First, an insistence 93 +AND 94 +for political legitimacy. 95 + 96 + 97 +====Hate speech may contribute to social deliberation – under a republican theory, it can’t be restricted. ==== 98 +**Febres summarizes Meiklejohn 2:** Power Febres, C. Liberalism, feminism and republicanism on freedom of speech: the cases of pornography and racist hate speech. Dissertation. UCL (University College London), 2011. APA. DL 1.7.17 99 +The case of 100 +AND 101 +vigorous political system. 102 + 103 + 104 +====c) The legitimacy of civil rights laws that protect minority groups depends on the protection of hate speech – otherwise they would constitute arbitrary interference. Dworkin 06,^^ ^^==== 105 +So in a 106 +AND 107 +makes democracy possible. 108 + 109 + 110 +=Underview= 111 + 112 +====Allowing limitations on free speech because its "offensive" creates emotional trauma and more violence in the real world.==== 113 +**Lukianoff and Haidt 15** Jonathan Haidt (social psychologist and professor of ethical leadership at the NYU-Stern School of Business) and Greg Lukianoff (president and CEO of the Foundatino of Individual Rights in Education) "The Coddling of the American Mind" The Atlantic September 2015 http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/ 114 +Cognitive behavioral therapy 115 +AND 116 +aspects of our history." - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-19 18:17:14.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Bob Overing - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Strake Jesuit CL - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hunter College Frankel Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +jf ~-~- 1ac ~-~- civic republicanism - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard
- Caselist.RoundClass[1]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-09-17 16:32:28.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Becca Traber - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Syosset AM - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Yale
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-24 23:11:52.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Ana Calizo, Raul Larsen, Allan Xu - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Success Academy SC - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Semis - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Beltway
- Caselist.RoundClass[3]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-25 22:06:52.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tiffany Dacheux - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Randolph AP - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Beltway
- Caselist.RoundClass[4]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-18 05:21:34.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Ben Koh - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stuyvesant KL - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Penn
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-18 05:25:56.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Heaven Montague - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harrison LC - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Penn
- Caselist.RoundClass[6]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-18 14:44:11.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jason Smith - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Christopher Columbus AT - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-19 18:17:11.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Bob Overing - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Strake Jesuit CL - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard