| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,18 @@ |
|
1 |
+Counterplan: Congress should pass an act that grants Native American court the authority to control their land |
|
2 |
+Segal 12. Alice Segal. URANIUM MINING AND THE NAVAJO NATION - LEGAL INJUSTICE. Southern California Review of Law and Social Justice. |
|
3 |
+Congress should pass …forced upon them. |
|
4 |
+Tribes don’t want waste dumping so the CP solves. Johnson 12 |
|
5 |
+Johnson, Charles K. "A Sovereignty of Convenience: Native American Sovereignty and the United States Government's Plan for Radioactive Waste on Indian Land." Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development 9.2 (2012): 22. |
|
6 |
+Given the financial … an NFZ since 1984. |
|
7 |
+The counterplan is the best method of compensating for historical injustice and granting sovereignty. |
|
8 |
+Segal 12 |
|
9 |
+Segal 12. Alice Segal. URANIUM MINING AND THE NAVAJO NATION - LEGAL INJUSTICE. Southern California Review of Law and Social Justice. |
|
10 |
+Only a direct …of uranium mining. |
|
11 |
+Not including the Natives, themselves in the decisions making process is reinforcing colonialism. In order to solve any of the aff impacts we much include them in the process. |
|
12 |
+Ishiyama 3 |
|
13 |
+Ishiyama, Noriko. "Environmental justice and American Indian tribal sovereignty: Case study of a land–use conflict in Skull Valley, Utah." Antipode 35.1 (2003): 119-139. |
|
14 |
+Within the contexts … this debate thus far |
|
15 |
+Certain tribes benefit from deals with companies because they give them clout. |
|
16 |
+Ishiyama 3 |
|
17 |
+Ishiyama, Noriko. "Environmental justice and American Indian tribal sovereignty: Case study of a land–use conflict in Skull Valley, Utah." Antipode 35.1 (2003): 119-139. |
|
18 |
+The Goshutes live … Tooele County, Utah. |