Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[2]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[4]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[2]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-10-29 22:03:17.469
	1	+2016-10-29 22:03:17.0

Caselist.CitesClass[4]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,127 @@
	1	+=1NC Shell=
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+==Part 1 - The End is Coming==
	5	+
	6	+
	7	+====First, there are a multitude of scenarios for Nuclear War. ====
	8	+**Moore No Date** Retaliation By, Carol Moore, "Six Escalation Scenarios to World Nuclear War," No Publication, http://www.carolmoore.net/nuclearwar/alternatescenarios.html - Hebron AL
	9	+A world nuclear war is one that involves most or all nuclear powers releasing a
	10	+AND
	11	+and lead to unforeseeable consequences that could easily spiral to world nuclear war.
	12	+
	13	+
	14	+====Access to Civil Nuclear power leads to proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. ====
	15	+**Diesendorf 15 **Mark Diesendorf, 5-18-2015, "Accidents, waste and weapons: nuclear power isn't worth the risks," Conversation, http://theconversation.com/accidents-waste-and-weapons-nuclear-power-isnt-worth-the-risks-41522 - Hebron AL
	16	+The case for expanding nuclear energy is based on myths about its status, greenhouse
	17	+AND
	18	+smooth out the supply. Why would we need to bother with nuclear?
	19	+
	20	+
	21	+====Proliferation makes Nuclear War Inevitable. ====
	22	+**Waltz 95** Kenneth Waltz, prof. Of International Relations in the Institute for Global Cooperation and Conflict at the U. of California, and Scott Sagan, Prof of International Relations and Stanford University's Center for International Security and Arms Control, 1995, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate, P. ~~la) – Hebron AL
	23	+In short, while there have been no catastrophic nuclear weapons accidents in the new
	24	+AND
	25	+positive safety record is likely to be only the lull before the storm.
	26	+
	27	+
	28	+====If the risk of war is not zero, it is an eventual certainty. ====
	29	+**Kenneth 91** E. After the Cold War: Questioning the Morality of Nuclear Detterence 1991 pg. 104 Boulding, prof of economics, Emeritus at U Colorado, 1991 – Hebron AL
	30	+If the probability of nuclear weapons going off is not zero then if we wait
	31	+AND
	32	+percent, and in 1,000 years, 99.996 percent.
	33	+
	34	+
	35	+==Part 2 – The Aftermath==
	36	+
	37	+
	38	+====Nuclear war will not cause the doomsday scenarios they assume. Nuclear fallout and radiation are myths used to misguide the public. Nuclear war would be very much survivable, it's empirically proven by natural disasters and the bombs dropped in Japan. Prefer our evidence, it cites specific studies and Ivy League professors, their evidence assumes stacked studies.====
	39	+**Nyquist 99** (Nyquist, Jeffrey R. Contributing Editor. WorldNetDaily. Expert. Geopolitics. "Is Nuclear War Survivable?" WorldNetDaily. May 20, 1999. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=19722.) – Hebron AL
	40	+I patiently reply to these correspondents that nuclear war would not be the end of
	41	+AND
	42	+the radiation from a nuclear war contaminate the whole earth, killing everyone?
	43	+
	44	+
	45	+====Second, more people currently die of smoking and car accidents than would through nuclear fallout, which subsists quickly.====
	46	+**Nyquist 99** (Nyquist, Jeffrey R. Contributing Editor. WorldNetDaily. Expert. Geopolitics. "Is Nuclear War Survivable?" WorldNetDaily. May 20, 1999. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=19722.) – Hebron AL
	47	+OK, so nuclear winter isn't going to happen. What about nuclear fallout?
	48	+AND
	49	+we do not take seriously the nuclear war preparations of Russia and China.
	50	+
	51	+
	52	+====Third, "the worst that nuclear war could do" is unable to cause orbit alteration, rotational axis shift, oceanic collapse, planetary explosion, or biodiversity loss. Life would survive.====
	53	+**Sagan and Turco 90** (Sagan, Carl Edward. B.A. Recipient. Physics. M.A. Recipient. Physics. Ph.D. Recipient. Astronomy/Astrophysics. University of Chicago. Professor. Astronomy. Critical Thinking. Cornell University. Advisor. National Aeronautical and Space Administration. Turco, Richard P. Professor. Atmospheric Sciences. University of California – Los Angeles. Director. Institute for the Environment. University of California – Los Angeles. A Path Where No Man Thought: Nuclear Winter and the End of the Arms Race. Pg. 63. 1990.) – Hebron AL
	54	+What is the worst that nuclear war could do? Our technology – while capable
	55	+AND
	56	+, understandably, an important question is whether we can make humans extinct.
	57	+
	58	+
	59	+====Fourth, even launching every weapon on Earth wouldn't cause extinction.====
	60	+**Gay 87** (Gay, William C. Ph.D. Recipient. Professor. The Nuclear Arms Race: The Last Quarter Century. Pg. 14. 1987.) – Hebron AL
	61	+Bernard Feld, a major critic of nuclear weapons who has done extensive research on
	62	+AND
	63	+blast and radiation potential is insufficient to guarantee human annihilation in any war.
	64	+
	65	+
	66	+==Part 3 – The Recovery==
	67	+
	68	+
	69	+===Subpoint A – Environment===
	70	+
	71	+
	72	+====Nuclear war is inevitable because of resource shortages, overpopulation, easy access to plutonium, industrialization, and the desire for something to gain. We must seek nuclear war now; it is the only solution to the environmental crisis and human misery, poverty, and hopelessness. Each year 30,000 species go extinct as a result of industrialization and overpopulation, only nuclear war can solve these problems. Delay only risks extinction of other species and humanity. This is our chance to save the environment and ourselves.====
	73	+**Caldwell 3 **(Caldwell, Joseph George. Economic Growth Supervisor. Worldwide. PhD. Mathematical Statistics. "What Oil Can Do to Tiny States: And Big Ones, Too!" February 3, 2003.)
	74	+It would appear that global nuclear war is inevitable, for several reasons. A
	75	+AND
	76	+a global nuclear war happens now, the production of greenhouse gases stops.
	77	+
	78	+
	79	+====The attempt to save as many humans as possible is a flawed approach that only leads to destruction of the environment and thus humanity. Rather, we must adopt the minimal-regret strategy to preserve the environment, from which all other purposes and goals can be derived. The protection of the environment is the purpose of humanity.====
	80	+**Caldwell 2k **(Caldwell, Joseph George. Economic Growth Supervisor. Worldwide. PhD. Mathematical Statistics. "Can America Survive?" November 21, 2000.) – Hebron AL
	81	+Population policies that attempt to maximize the number of human beings on the planet,
	82	+AND
	83	+term survival of the human race, this is an incredibly absurd approach.
	84	+
	85	+
	86	+===Subpoint B: Future Weapons===
	87	+
	88	+
	89	+====Putting off war until these weapons come to fruition guarantees a calamity thousands of times worse than nuclear war. Only way to prevent this is if we have war now and reverse the development. ====
	90	+
	91	+
	92	+====Antimatter Weapons are coming and are more destructive than Nuclear Weapons. ====
	93	+**IDR 97 **International Defense Review 1997, (The Civil Science, January 1^^st^^, 1997, pg. 61. – Hebron AL
	94	+In the future, nuclear-fusion weapons may be triggered by laser beams or
	95	+AND
	96	+of anti-protons would be enough to trigger a large thermonuclear explosion.
	97	+
	98	+
	99	+====Pure Fusion Bombs are coming and would precipitate substantially worse nuclear wars. ====
	100	+**PPG 98** Pittsburgh Post Gazzette 98 July 27, 1998, Monday, Sooner Edition, Section: Science, Technology, and Medicine, pg. A-9. Length 799 words. Headline: Activist fear "Pure Fusion" bomb likely. – Hebron AL
	101	+A frightening new generation of "pure fusion" nuclear weapons might emerge from the
	102	+AND
	103	+it easier for generals or politicians to justify using nuclear weapons during wartime.
	104	+
	105	+
	106	+====Coming Laser Technologies could annihilate whole Solar Systems.====
	107	+**Langford 79** , Weapons physicist at Atomic Weapons Research Establishment in Aldermason, 1979. (David War in 2080: The Future of Military Technology, 1979, pg. 206) – Hebron AL
	108	+Such a weapon may be available to Type II civilizations. The astrophysicist Geoffery Burbridge
	109	+AND
	110	+late that Earth is inhabited by radio- and TV- using beings.
	111	+
	112	+
	113	+===Subpoint C: Conciousness Shift===
	114	+
	115	+
	116	+====First, to move beyond the static order of things in which we must await our fate wondering only how long to live and how bad the weapons we must consider the possibility that it is only through a nuclear war that we could prevent something far worse later. Only by allowing nuclear war to occur can we shift from the dichotomy of war and peace to a new age of harmony, to be co-creators of Earth. This is the only way to solve for their impacts and to bear witness to all beings, including humanity.====
	117	+**Zimmerman 87** ~~Michael E – Prof at Newcomb College, Tulane U. "Anthropocentric Humanism and the Arms Race," Nuclear War~~ – Hebron AL
	118	+Today, we are faced with facts and evidence about the nuclear arms race that
	119	+AND
	120	+and sons of the Earth-co-creators of the cosmic order.
	121	+
	122	+
	123	+====Second, Nuclear War would catalyze voluntary Nuclear Abolition. ====
	124	+**Miller 88** Miller, Fellow at the Center for Science and International Affairs, 1988 ( James N. Jr., Fateful Visions Avoiding Nuclear Catastrophe, E.D. Joseph S. Nye Jr., Graham T. Allison, Albert Carnesale, "Zero and Minimal Nuclear Weapons," 1988, pg. 16-17. – Hebron AL
	125	+It seems unlikely that the American Public would strongly support an agreement for zero nuclear
	126	+AND
	127	+path to an agreement to abolish nuclear weapons may be a nuclear war.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-10-29 22:03:19.527

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Colleyville Herritage High School Eesha Charaniya

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Jennifer Melin

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+5

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Hebron Lalani Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+SeptOct - NC - Spark

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+University of North Texas TFA