| ... |
... |
@@ -1,26
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-==Nayar CP== |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-====Counter Plan Text ==== |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-====Countries ought to gradually prohibit the production of Nuclear Power ==== |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
-====Competition:==== |
| 11 |
|
- |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-====Mutually Exclusive====– The AC can't advocate for both a gradual prohibition and an immediate prohibition. |
| 14 |
|
- |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
-====Net Benefits==== |
| 17 |
|
- |
| 18 |
|
- |
| 19 |
|
-====Globalized viewpoints of solving always fail, it is through targeting key contributors to the problem can the problem be solved, this gives the CP unique grounds of solvency since we begin this through gradually prohibiting the production of nuclear power. ==== |
| 20 |
|
-**Nayar 99 **Nayar, Jayan. Professor. Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems. University of Warwick. Fall 1999. "Re-Framing International Law for the 21^^st^^ Century." Order of Inhumanity. - Hebron AL |
| 21 |
|
-The description of the continuities of violence in Section II in many ways is familiar |
| 22 |
|
-AND |
| 23 |
|
-on what is perhaps less often the focus of critiques of "ordering." |
| 24 |
|
- |
| 25 |
|
- |
| 26 |
|
-====The CP is topical, they clearly concede in CX that the ban is an immediate change. Nayar 99 also acts as a solvency takeout because the globalized vision that they have for solving will inevitably fail due to them not targeting key factors to the problem. ==== |