Changes for page Hebron Lalani Aff
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 12 added, 8 removed)
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
- Caselist.CitesClass[10]
- Caselist.CitesClass[11]
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
- Caselist.CitesClass[14]
- Caselist.CitesClass[15]
- Caselist.CitesClass[16]
- Caselist.CitesClass[17]
- Caselist.CitesClass[18]
- Caselist.CitesClass[19]
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
- Caselist.RoundClass[10]
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
- Caselist.RoundClass[14]
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,3 +1,0 @@ 1 -If I haven't disclosed which is highly unlikely, ask me before our round and I'll be more than happy to inform you. If you have any questions, concerns, feel free to contact me at lalanidebate@gmail.com 2 - 3 -I disclose on behalf of the Hebron High School LD team so whoever you hit most probably runs the same things as me. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-04 19:33:39.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - Contact - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone
- Caselist.CitesClass[10]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,20 +1,0 @@ 1 -==Structural Violence FW== 2 -====Resisting Structural Violence has to come first in debate round. ==== 3 -**Wise 8** Tim Wise 8 (Race Relations Specialist, Activst, Orator), White Like Me, 2008 96 - 97 – Hebron AL 4 -Until the voices of economically and racially marginalized persons are given equal weight in debate 5 -AND 6 -desperately need to listen to those who live without the luxury of blinders. 7 - 8 - 9 -====First, structural violence is based in moral exclusion, which is fundamentally flawed.==== 10 -**Winter and Leighton 99**, Deborah DuNann Winter (Psychologist) and Dana C. Leighton (PhD at University of Arkansas), 2009, "Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology in the 21st century." – Hebron AL 11 -Finally, to recognize the operation of structural violence forces us to ask questions about 12 -AND 13 -local cultures, will be our most surefooted path to building lasting peace. 14 - 15 - 16 -====Second, debate should deal with questions of real-world consequences—ideal theories ignore the concrete nature of the world and legitimize oppression.==== 17 -**Curry 14**, Dr. Tommy J. Curry (Professor at AandM), 1/2-2014, "The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century, "Victory Briefs – Hebron AL 18 -Despite the pronouncement of debate as an activity and intellectual exercise pointing to the real 19 -AND 20 -used to currently justify the living wages in under our contemporary moral parameters. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-29 23:17:55.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - FW - Structural Violence - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone
- Caselist.CitesClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,49 +1,0 @@ 1 -==Utilitarianism FW== 2 - 3 - 4 -====The standard is maximizing utility. ==== 5 - 6 - 7 -====First, reductionism.==== 8 - 9 - 10 -====Brain studies prove personal identity doesn't exist. ==== 11 -**Parfit 84**^^^^Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984). – Hebron AL 12 -Some recent medical cases provide striking evidence in favour of the Reductionist View. Human 13 -AND 14 -, and can receive two different answers written by this person's two hands. 15 - 16 - 17 -====In the absence of personal identity, only end states can matter ==== 18 -**Shoemaker 99**^^^^Shoemaker, David (Dept of Philosophy, U Memphis). "Utilitarianism and Personal Identity." The Journal of Value Inquiry 33: 183–199, 1999. http://www.csun.edu/~~ds56723/jvipaper.pdf - Hebron AL 19 -Extreme reductionism might lend support to utilitarianism in the following way. Many people claim 20 -AND 21 -, would be the most plausible. Utilitarianism is just such a theory. 22 - 23 - 24 -====Second, moral uncertainty means that extinction comes first under any moral system.==== 25 -**Bostrom 1**^^^^Nick Bostrom, 2001 prof of Philosophy, Oxford University ~~ Journal of Evolution and Technology, Vol. 9, March 2002. First version: 2001 March, JStor – Hebron AL 26 -~~Brackets for clarity~~ These reflections on moral uncertainty suggest~~s~~ an 27 -AND 28 -to increase the probability that the future will contain a lot of value. 29 - 30 - 31 -====Third, respect for human worth would justify util. ==== 32 -**Cummiskey 90**^^^^Cummiskey, David. Associate professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago. "Kantian Consequentiaism." Ethics 100 (April 1990), University of Chicago. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381810 - Hebron AL 33 -We must not obscure the issue by characterizing this type of case as the sacrifice 34 -AND 35 -a fundamental equality that dictates that some must sometimes give way for the sake 36 - 37 - 38 -====Fourth, the very nature of the US government is to maximize utility. ==== 39 -**Abraham Lincoln 1864**^^^^Lincoln, Abraham (16^^th^^ President of the US, Solid beard, Stopped slavery, Posthumous National Wrestling Hall of Fame inductee). Letter to A.G. Hodges. 4 April 1864. – Hebron AL 40 -I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is 41 -AND 42 -should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution all together. 43 - 44 - 45 -====Fifth, universalizability justifies util. ==== 46 -**Singer 93**^^^^Peter Singer, "Practical Ethics," Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 13-14 – Hebron AL 47 -The universal aspect of ethics, I suggest, does provide a persuasive, although 48 -AND 49 -the course of action most likely to maximize the interests of those affected. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-29 23:17:55.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - FW - Utilitarianism - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,49 +1,0 @@ 1 -==Consequentialism FW== 2 - 3 - 4 -====The standard is consequentialism. ==== 5 - 6 - 7 -====First, reductionism.==== 8 - 9 - 10 -====Brain studies prove personal identity doesn't exist. ==== 11 -**Parfit 84**^^^^Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984). – Hebron AL 12 -Some recent medical cases provide striking evidence in favour of the Reductionist View. Human 13 -AND 14 -, and can receive two different answers written by this person's two hands. 15 - 16 - 17 -====In the absence of personal identity, only end states can matter ==== 18 -**Shoemaker 99**^^^^Shoemaker, David (Dept of Philosophy, U Memphis). "Utilitarianism and Personal Identity." The Journal of Value Inquiry 33: 183–199, 1999. http://www.csun.edu/~~ds56723/jvipaper.pdf - Hebron AL 19 -Extreme reductionism might lend support to utilitarianism in the following way. Many people claim 20 -AND 21 -, would be the most plausible. Utilitarianism is just such a theory. 22 - 23 - 24 -====Second, moral uncertainty means that extinction comes first under any moral system.==== 25 -**Bostrom 1**^^^^Nick Bostrom, 2001 prof of Philosophy, Oxford University ~~ Journal of Evolution and Technology, Vol. 9, March 2002. First version: 2001 March, JStor – Hebron AL 26 -~~Brackets for clarity~~ These reflections on moral uncertainty suggest~~s~~ an 27 -AND 28 -to increase the probability that the future will contain a lot of value. 29 - 30 - 31 -====Third, respect for human worth would justify util. ==== 32 -**Cummiskey 90**^^^^Cummiskey, David. Associate professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago. "Kantian Consequentiaism." Ethics 100 (April 1990), University of Chicago. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381810 - Hebron AL 33 -We must not obscure the issue by characterizing this type of case as the sacrifice 34 -AND 35 -a fundamental equality that dictates that some must sometimes give way for the sake 36 - 37 - 38 -====Fourth, governments have a specific obligation to be utilitarian.==== 39 -**Woller 97** BYU Prof., "An Overview by Gary Woller", A Forum on the Role of Environmental Ethics, June 1997, pg. 10 – Hebron AL 40 -~~Brackets for clarity~~ Moreover, virtually all public policies entail some redistribution of 41 -AND 42 -regulatory unreasonableness while failing to adequately address the problem or actually making it worse 43 - 44 - 45 -====Fifth, universalizability justifies util. ==== 46 -**Singer 93**^^^^Peter Singer, "Practical Ethics," Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 13-14 – Hebron AL 47 -The universal aspect of ethics, I suggest, does provide a persuasive, although 48 -AND 49 -the course of action most likely to maximize the interests of those affected. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-29 23:17:55.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - FW - Consequentialism - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,20 +1,0 @@ 1 -==Theory Deterrence UV== 2 - 3 - 4 -====1. Don't vote on presumption or permissibility because human fallibility means there's always a non-zero risk of offense. If you do presume, then presume aff to offset 7-4-6-3 time skew and the 8 neg bias last year^^ ^^ and at the TOC specifically^^ ^^ which impact turn his shells. TOC stats come first; they account for time skew, highest level, and all other factors to determine net effect, and analytics get overstated by debaters to win rounds. ==== 5 - 6 - 7 -====2. Neg burden is to win offense to a post-fiat advocacy. Offense-defense is key to fairness and real world education.==== 8 -Nelson 8 Adam F. Nelson, J.D.1. Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Lincoln-Douglas Debate. 2008. – Hebron AS 9 -And the truth-statement model of the resolution imposes an absolute burden of proof 10 -AND 11 -know how the various options affect us and the world we live in. 12 - 13 - 14 -====3. The neg must defend one unconditional advocacy. Conditionality is bad because it makes the neg a moving target which kills 1AR strategy. He'll kick it if I cover it and extend it if I undercover it, meaning I have no strategic options. Also, it's unreciprocal because I can't kick the AC.==== 15 - 16 - 17 -====4. Err aff against theory. Intervention's inevitable in blippy theory debates. Gut checking minimizes it long term by reducing the number of debates resolved on blippy, dropped spikes. I'm reading a stock aff at the core of the lit, and it's on the wiki.==== 18 - 19 - 20 -====5. Independently, voting on theory encourages more frivolous theory in future rounds which crowds out topic education. Any aff abuse must be weighed against this innate DA to theory, which sets a non-arbitrary brightline for reasonability.==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-29 23:17:55.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - FW - Theory Deterrence UV - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-04 19:33:37.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -10,11,12,13 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-29 23:17:37.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-16 02:58:04.485 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Matt Dooley - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -North Crowley Tania Garcia - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,10 +1,0 @@ 1 -1AC 2 -Util FW 3 -Util AC 4 -Theory Deterrence UV 5 -(This AC is v bad I'll never run this again) 6 - 7 -1NC 8 -State Bad K 9 -Wilderson K 10 -Two DA's - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Byron Nelson TFA
- Caselist.CitesClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,91 @@ 1 +=Shmoney Team AC= 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 +====Plan Text: The United States Federal Government ought to limit Qualified Immunity for Police Officers. ==== 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 +==Advantage 1: Ben Carson== 10 + 11 +====U.S. soft power is low now.==== 12 +**Lehmann 4/28** Lehmann, Jean-Pierre(professor of international political economy at IMD and the founding director of The Evian Group at IMD). "The Collapse Of US Soft Power - Global Impacts."Forbes. Forbes Magazine, 28 Apr. 2016. Web. 31 Oct. 2016 – Hebron AL 13 +Global Perspectives Global governance is adrift. Much of this arises from the lack of 14 +AND 15 +legitimacy and is effectively dead – even while nothing has replaced it yet. 16 + 17 +====Qualified immunity excrabates police brutality==== 18 +**Wright 15** Sam Wright(DC based attorney), Source: Thomson Reuters, Source: My Shingle, Source: Law Sites Blog, and Source: Above The Law. "Want to Fight Police Misconduct? Reform Qualified Immunity." Above the Law. Above the Law, 3 Nov. 2015. Web. 27 Oct. 2016 – Hebron AL 19 +I think Megan McArdle is probably right that these proposals (and the others in 20 +AND 21 +show that that conduct's illegality has already been clearly established in the courts? 22 + 23 +====Police brutality delegitimizes the United States in the eyes of the rest of the world, decreasing their soft power==== 24 +**Pullen 14** Pullen, Bethany(Master of Public Diplomacy from the University of Southern California and a B.A. in International Studies and currently works as a research project manager in education policy at the University of Pittsburgh). "The Achilles Heel of U.S. Public Diplomacy: Race Relations and Police Violence." USC Center of Public Diplomacy. USC Annenburg, 8 Sept. 2014. Web. 27 Oct. 2016 – Hebron AL 25 +Becoming inured to domestic atrocities delegitimizes American authority on issues of global human rights and 26 +AND 27 +by the State Department, nor any public commitment to promoting legislative changes. 28 + 29 +====Soft power solves multiple scenarios for extinction.==== 30 +**Nye and Armitage 7 **Joseph S. Nye (University Distinguished Service Professor at Harvard University; Previous Dean of Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government; Inventor of the concept of soft power; not related to Bill Nye the Science Guy) and Richard Armitage (13th United States Deputy Secretary of State, second-in-command at the State Department, 2001 to 2005). "CSIS Reports – A Smarter, More Secure America." November 6, 2007. http://www.csis.org/component/option,com_csis_pubs/task,view/id,4156/type,1/ - Hebron AL 31 +Soft power is the ability to attract people to our side without coercion. Legitimacy 32 +AND 33 +least as much as their ability to destroy the enemy's will to fight. 34 + 35 +==Advantage 2: Cocoa Puffs== 36 + 37 +====Racial tensions have increased and at an all time peak==== 38 +**Norman 4/11** Norman, Jim. "U.S. Worries About Race Relations Reach a New High."Gallup.com. N.p., 11 Apr. 2016. Web. 25 Oct. 2016. - Hebron AL 39 +More than a third (35) of Americans now say they are worried " 40 +AND 41 +than 50 for healthcare, the economy, and crime and violence. 42 + 43 +====The court has a long history of discounting the interests of minority populations–qualified immunity just exacerbates racism entrenched in the system. ==== 44 +Reinhardt 15 Stephen R. Reinhardt, ~~Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit~~, "The Demise of Habeas Corpus and the Rise of Qualified Immunity: The Court's Ever Increasing Limitations on the Development and Enforcement of Constitutional Rights and some Particularly Unfortunate Consequences," Michigan Law Review, Vol. 113, 2015. - Hebron AL 45 +The Court has often remarked that "to perform its high function in the best 46 +AND 47 +the more lenient state statute, were seemingly reserved for black defendants alone. 48 + 49 +====Racism is the root cause of war==== 50 +**Foucault '76 **~~Michel, Society Must be Defended: Lectures at the College de France, 1975-1976, p. 254-257 Trans. David Macey~~ - Hebron AL 51 +What in fact is racism? It is primarily a way of introducing a break 52 +AND 53 +half of the nineteenth century), except by activating the theme of racism. 54 + 55 +====Extinction==== 56 +**Hagopian 15**(Joachim Hagopian is a West Point graduate and former US Army officer. He has written a manuscript based on his unique military experience entitled "Don't Let The Bastards Getcha Down." It examines and focuses on US international relations, leadership and national security issues. After the military, Joachim earned a masters degree in Clinical Psychology and worked as a licensed therapist in the mental health field for more than a quarter century. He now concentrates on his writing.) - Hebron AL 57 +The only rational conclusion is that the oligarchs have the human race is free fall 58 +AND 59 +suicide of the entire human species has destroyed all life on the planet. 60 + 61 +==Advantage 3: Time-Out Time== 62 + 63 +====Limiting qualified immunity is key to hold police accountable.==== 64 +**Wright 15 **Sam Wright (Public Interest Lawyer). "Want to Fight Police Misconduct? Reform Qualified Immunity." Above the Law. 3 November 2015. http://abovethelaw.com/2015/11/want-to-fightpolice- misconduct-reform-qualified-immunity/ - Hebron AL 65 +In order to truly hold police accountable for bad acts, civilians must be able 66 +AND 67 +want to see justice done, we should push to make it happen. 68 + 69 +====Criminal law can't hold police accountable; civil suits are key.==== 70 +**Geller and Toch 59 **William A. Geller, JD, (Director of Geller and Associates) and Hans Toch (professor of psychology in the School of Criminal Justice at the University of Albany). "Police Violence: Understanding and Controlling Police Abuse of Force." Yale University Press, Nov 12, 1959. Google Books. – Hebron AL 71 +The main objective of a criminal case is to adjudicate guilt and express societal condemnation 72 +AND 73 +harm caused but to reform so that the harm is not likely repeated. 74 + 75 +====Police accountability is key to reducing crime.==== 76 +**Tyler et al. 15 **Tom R. Tyler (Yale Law School and Yale University), Phillip Atiba Goff (University of California, Los Angeles), and Robert J. MacCoun (Stanford Law School). "The Impact of Psychological Science on Policing in the United States: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Effective Law Enforcement." Psychological Science in the Public Interest (Volume 16, Number 3). 2 November 2015. http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/policing.html - Hebron AL 77 +In the past few decades, law enforcement has primarily used a deterrence model to 78 +AND 79 +by reporting crimes, identifying criminals, and acting as witnesses during trials. 80 + 81 +====Lack of Reduction of crime leads to poverty.==== 82 +**Samenow 14** Stanton E. Samenow Ph.D Posted Dec, 12-24-2014, "Crime Causes Poverty," Psychology Today, https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/inside-the-criminal-mind/201412/crime-causes-poverty - Hebron AL 83 +Social scientists and public officials have long identified poverty as a "root cause" 84 +AND 85 +it when criminals demolish overnight what they have worked so hard to build. 86 + 87 +====Poverty dehumanizes and kills the poor, more have died from poverty in the last 53 years than all who died in Vietnam==== 88 +**Loffredo 93** Assistant Professor of Law, City University of New York Law School at Queens College (Stephen, 141 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1277, "POVERTY, DEMOCRACY AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW," – Hebron AL 89 + ~~*1315~~ The statement that the poor "have done very well" 90 +AND 91 +welfare programs that would result in shared benefits to society at large. n227 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-20 01:22:07.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Matt Dooley - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +North Crowley Tania Garcia - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +11 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NovDec - Shmoney Team AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Byron Nelson TFA
- Caselist.CitesClass[15]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,3 @@ 1 +If I haven't disclosed which is highly unlikely, ask me before our round and I'll be more than happy to inform you. If you have any questions, concerns, feel free to contact me at lalanidebate@gmail.com 2 + 3 +I disclose on behalf of the Hebron High School LD team so whoever you hit most probably runs the same things as me. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-20 01:25:17.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +12 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - Contact - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone
- Caselist.CitesClass[16]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,20 @@ 1 +==Structural Violence FW== 2 +====Resisting Structural Violence has to come first in debate round. ==== 3 +**Wise 8** Tim Wise 8 (Race Relations Specialist, Activst, Orator), White Like Me, 2008 96 - 97 – Hebron AL 4 +Until the voices of economically and racially marginalized persons are given equal weight in debate 5 +AND 6 +desperately need to listen to those who live without the luxury of blinders. 7 + 8 + 9 +====First, structural violence is based in moral exclusion, which is fundamentally flawed.==== 10 +**Winter and Leighton 99**, Deborah DuNann Winter (Psychologist) and Dana C. Leighton (PhD at University of Arkansas), 2009, "Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology in the 21st century." – Hebron AL 11 +Finally, to recognize the operation of structural violence forces us to ask questions about 12 +AND 13 +local cultures, will be our most surefooted path to building lasting peace. 14 + 15 + 16 +====Second, debate should deal with questions of real-world consequences—ideal theories ignore the concrete nature of the world and legitimize oppression.==== 17 +**Curry 14**, Dr. Tommy J. Curry (Professor at AandM), 1/2-2014, "The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century, "Victory Briefs – Hebron AL 18 +Despite the pronouncement of debate as an activity and intellectual exercise pointing to the real 19 +AND 20 +used to currently justify the living wages in under our contemporary moral parameters. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-20 01:27:12.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - FW - Structural Violence - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone
- Caselist.CitesClass[17]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,49 @@ 1 +==Utilitarianism FW== 2 + 3 + 4 +====The standard is maximizing utility. ==== 5 + 6 + 7 +====First, reductionism.==== 8 + 9 + 10 +====Brain studies prove personal identity doesn't exist. ==== 11 +**Parfit 84** ^^^^Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984). – Hebron AL 12 +Some recent medical cases provide striking evidence in favour of the Reductionist View. Human 13 +AND 14 +, and can receive two different answers written by this person's two hands. 15 + 16 + 17 +====In the absence of personal identity, only end states can matter ==== 18 +**Shoemaker 99** ^^^^Shoemaker, David (Dept of Philosophy, U Memphis). "Utilitarianism and Personal Identity." The Journal of Value Inquiry 33: 183–199, 1999. http://www.csun.edu/~~ds56723/jvipaper.pdf - Hebron AL 19 +Extreme reductionism might lend support to utilitarianism in the following way. Many people claim 20 +AND 21 +, would be the most plausible. Utilitarianism is just such a theory. 22 + 23 + 24 +====Second, moral uncertainty means that extinction comes first under any moral system.==== 25 +**Bostrom 1** ^^^^Nick Bostrom, 2001 prof of Philosophy, Oxford University ~~ Journal of Evolution and Technology, Vol. 9, March 2002. First version: 2001 March, JStor – Hebron AL 26 +~~Brackets for clarity~~ These reflections on moral uncertainty suggest~~s~~ an 27 +AND 28 +to increase the probability that the future will contain a lot of value. 29 + 30 + 31 +====Third, respect for human worth would justify util. ==== 32 +**Cummiskey 90** ^^^^Cummiskey, David. Associate professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago. "Kantian Consequentiaism." Ethics 100 (April 1990), University of Chicago. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381810 - Hebron AL 33 +We must not obscure the issue by characterizing this type of case as the sacrifice 34 +AND 35 +a fundamental equality that dictates that some must sometimes give way for the sake 36 + 37 + 38 +====Fourth, the very nature of the US government is to maximize utility. ==== 39 +**Abraham Lincoln 1864** ^^^^Lincoln, Abraham (16^^th^^ President of the US, Solid beard, Stopped slavery, Posthumous National Wrestling Hall of Fame inductee). Letter to A.G. Hodges. 4 April 1864. – Hebron AL 40 +I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is 41 +AND 42 +should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution all together. 43 + 44 + 45 +====Fifth, universalizability justifies util. ==== 46 +**Singer 93** ^^^^Peter Singer, "Practical Ethics," Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 13-14 – Hebron AL 47 +The universal aspect of ethics, I suggest, does provide a persuasive, although 48 +AND 49 +the course of action most likely to maximize the interests of those affected. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-20 01:27:12.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - FW - Utilitarianism - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone
- Caselist.CitesClass[18]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,49 @@ 1 +==Consequentialism FW== 2 + 3 + 4 +====The standard is consequentialism. ==== 5 + 6 + 7 +====First, reductionism.==== 8 + 9 + 10 +====Brain studies prove personal identity doesn't exist. ==== 11 +**Parfit 84** ^^^^Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984). – Hebron AL 12 +Some recent medical cases provide striking evidence in favour of the Reductionist View. Human 13 +AND 14 +, and can receive two different answers written by this person's two hands. 15 + 16 + 17 +====In the absence of personal identity, only end states can matter ==== 18 +**Shoemaker 99** ^^^^Shoemaker, David (Dept of Philosophy, U Memphis). "Utilitarianism and Personal Identity." The Journal of Value Inquiry 33: 183–199, 1999. http://www.csun.edu/~~ds56723/jvipaper.pdf - Hebron AL 19 +Extreme reductionism might lend support to utilitarianism in the following way. Many people claim 20 +AND 21 +, would be the most plausible. Utilitarianism is just such a theory. 22 + 23 + 24 +====Second, moral uncertainty means that extinction comes first under any moral system.==== 25 +**Bostrom 1** ^^^^Nick Bostrom, 2001 prof of Philosophy, Oxford University ~~ Journal of Evolution and Technology, Vol. 9, March 2002. First version: 2001 March, JStor – Hebron AL 26 +~~Brackets for clarity~~ These reflections on moral uncertainty suggest~~s~~ an 27 +AND 28 +to increase the probability that the future will contain a lot of value. 29 + 30 + 31 +====Third, respect for human worth would justify util. ==== 32 +**Cummiskey 90** ^^^^Cummiskey, David. Associate professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago. "Kantian Consequentiaism." Ethics 100 (April 1990), University of Chicago. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381810 - Hebron AL 33 +We must not obscure the issue by characterizing this type of case as the sacrifice 34 +AND 35 +a fundamental equality that dictates that some must sometimes give way for the sake 36 + 37 + 38 +====Fourth, governments have a specific obligation to be utilitarian.==== 39 +**Woller 97** BYU Prof., "An Overview by Gary Woller", A Forum on the Role of Environmental Ethics, June 1997, pg. 10 – Hebron AL 40 +~~Brackets for clarity~~ Moreover, virtually all public policies entail some redistribution of 41 +AND 42 +regulatory unreasonableness while failing to adequately address the problem or actually making it worse 43 + 44 + 45 +====Fifth, universalizability justifies util. ==== 46 +**Singer 93** ^^^^Peter Singer, "Practical Ethics," Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 13-14 – Hebron AL 47 +The universal aspect of ethics, I suggest, does provide a persuasive, although 48 +AND 49 +the course of action most likely to maximize the interests of those affected. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-20 01:27:13.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - FW - Consequentialism - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone
- Caselist.CitesClass[19]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,20 @@ 1 +==Theory Deterrence UV== 2 + 3 + 4 +====1. Don't vote on presumption or permissibility because human fallibility means there's always a non-zero risk of offense. If you do presume, then presume aff to offset 7-4-6-3 time skew and the 8 neg bias last year^^ ^^ and at the TOC specifically^^ ^^ which impact turn his shells. TOC stats come first; they account for time skew, highest level, and all other factors to determine net effect, and analytics get overstated by debaters to win rounds. ==== 5 + 6 + 7 +====2. Neg burden is to win offense to a post-fiat advocacy. Offense-defense is key to fairness and real world education.==== 8 +**Nelson 8** Adam F. Nelson, J.D.1. Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Lincoln-Douglas Debate. 2008. – Hebron AS 9 +And the truth-statement model of the resolution imposes an absolute burden of proof 10 +AND 11 +know how the various options affect us and the world we live in. 12 + 13 + 14 +====3. The neg must defend one unconditional advocacy. Conditionality is bad because it makes the neg a moving target which kills 1AR strategy. He'll kick it if I cover it and extend it if I undercover it, meaning I have no strategic options. Also, it's unreciprocal because I can't kick the AC.==== 15 + 16 + 17 +====4. Err aff against theory. Intervention's inevitable in blippy theory debates. Gut checking minimizes it long term by reducing the number of debates resolved on blippy, dropped spikes. I'm reading a stock aff at the core of the lit, and it's on the wiki.==== 18 + 19 + 20 +====5. Independently, voting on theory encourages more frivolous theory in future rounds which crowds out topic education. Any aff abuse must be weighed against this innate DA to theory, which sets a non-arbitrary brightline for reasonability.==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-20 01:27:13.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - FW - Theory Deterrence UV - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-20 01:21:08.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Matt Dooley - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +North Crowley Tania Garcia - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,10 @@ 1 +1AC 2 +Util FW 3 +Util AC 4 +Theory Deterrence UV 5 +(This AC is v bad I'll never run this again) 6 + 7 +1NC 8 +State Bad K 9 +Wilderson K 10 +Two DA's - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Byron Nelson TFA
- Caselist.RoundClass[10]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-20 01:21:13.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Matt Dooley - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +North Crowley Tania Garcia - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,10 @@ 1 +1AC 2 +Util FW 3 +Util AC 4 +Theory Deterrence UV 5 +(This AC is v bad I'll never run this again) 6 + 7 +1NC 8 +State Bad K 9 +Wilderson K 10 +Two DA's - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Byron Nelson TFA
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +14 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-20 01:22:05.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Matt Dooley - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +North Crowley Tania Garcia - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,10 @@ 1 +1AC 2 +Util FW 3 +Util AC 4 +Theory Deterrence UV 5 +(This AC is v bad I'll never run this again) 6 + 7 +1NC 8 +State Bad K 9 +Wilderson K 10 +Two DA's - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Byron Nelson TFA
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +15 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-20 01:25:16.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +16,17,18,19 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-20 01:27:10.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone
- Caselist.RoundClass[14]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-11 03:58:01.106 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Demming - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lovejoy Elizabeth Hager - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Octas - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,2 @@ 1 +1AC - Necropolitics 2 +1NC - Courts Clog with Rape Impact - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Berkner TFA