| ... |
... |
@@ -1,49
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-==Utilitarianism FW== |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-====The standard is maximizing utility. ==== |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-====First, reductionism.==== |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
-====Brain studies prove personal identity doesn't exist. ==== |
| 11 |
|
-**Parfit 84**^^^^Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984). – Hebron AL |
| 12 |
|
-Some recent medical cases provide striking evidence in favour of the Reductionist View. Human |
| 13 |
|
-AND |
| 14 |
|
-, and can receive two different answers written by this person's two hands. |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-====In the absence of personal identity, only end states can matter ==== |
| 18 |
|
-**Shoemaker 99**^^^^Shoemaker, David (Dept of Philosophy, U Memphis). "Utilitarianism and Personal Identity." The Journal of Value Inquiry 33: 183–199, 1999. http://www.csun.edu/~~ds56723/jvipaper.pdf - Hebron AL |
| 19 |
|
-Extreme reductionism might lend support to utilitarianism in the following way. Many people claim |
| 20 |
|
-AND |
| 21 |
|
-, would be the most plausible. Utilitarianism is just such a theory. |
| 22 |
|
- |
| 23 |
|
- |
| 24 |
|
-====Second, moral uncertainty means that extinction comes first under any moral system.==== |
| 25 |
|
-**Bostrom 1**^^^^Nick Bostrom, 2001 prof of Philosophy, Oxford University ~~ Journal of Evolution and Technology, Vol. 9, March 2002. First version: 2001 March, JStor – Hebron AL |
| 26 |
|
-~~Brackets for clarity~~ These reflections on moral uncertainty suggest~~s~~ an |
| 27 |
|
-AND |
| 28 |
|
-to increase the probability that the future will contain a lot of value. |
| 29 |
|
- |
| 30 |
|
- |
| 31 |
|
-====Third, respect for human worth would justify util. ==== |
| 32 |
|
-**Cummiskey 90**^^^^Cummiskey, David. Associate professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago. "Kantian Consequentiaism." Ethics 100 (April 1990), University of Chicago. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381810 - Hebron AL |
| 33 |
|
-We must not obscure the issue by characterizing this type of case as the sacrifice |
| 34 |
|
-AND |
| 35 |
|
-a fundamental equality that dictates that some must sometimes give way for the sake |
| 36 |
|
- |
| 37 |
|
- |
| 38 |
|
-====Fourth, the very nature of the US government is to maximize utility. ==== |
| 39 |
|
-**Abraham Lincoln 1864**^^^^Lincoln, Abraham (16^^th^^ President of the US, Solid beard, Stopped slavery, Posthumous National Wrestling Hall of Fame inductee). Letter to A.G. Hodges. 4 April 1864. – Hebron AL |
| 40 |
|
-I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is |
| 41 |
|
-AND |
| 42 |
|
-should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution all together. |
| 43 |
|
- |
| 44 |
|
- |
| 45 |
|
-====Fifth, universalizability justifies util. ==== |
| 46 |
|
-**Singer 93**^^^^Peter Singer, "Practical Ethics," Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 13-14 – Hebron AL |
| 47 |
|
-The universal aspect of ethics, I suggest, does provide a persuasive, although |
| 48 |
|
-AND |
| 49 |
|
-the course of action most likely to maximize the interests of those affected. |