Changes for page Hebron Lalani Aff
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:36
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[6]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-10-29 23:00:04. 9361 +2016-10-29 23:00:04.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,20 @@ 1 +==Theory Deterrence UV== 2 + 3 + 4 +====1. Don't vote on presumption or permissibility because human fallibility means there's always a non-zero risk of offense. If you do presume, then presume aff to offset 7-4-6-3 time skew and the 8 neg bias last year^^ ^^ and at the TOC specifically^^ ^^ which impact turn his shells. TOC stats come first; they account for time skew, highest level, and all other factors to determine net effect, and analytics get overstated by debaters to win rounds. ==== 5 + 6 + 7 +====2. Neg burden is to win offense to a post-fiat advocacy. Offense-defense is key to fairness and real world education.==== 8 +Nelson 8 Adam F. Nelson, J.D.1. Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Lincoln-Douglas Debate. 2008. – Hebron AS 9 +And the truth-statement model of the resolution imposes an absolute burden of proof 10 +AND 11 +know how the various options affect us and the world we live in. 12 + 13 + 14 +====3. The neg must defend one unconditional advocacy. Conditionality is bad because it makes the neg a moving target which kills 1AR strategy. He'll kick it if I cover it and extend it if I undercover it, meaning I have no strategic options. Also, it's unreciprocal because I can't kick the AC.==== 15 + 16 + 17 +====4. Err aff against theory. Intervention's inevitable in blippy theory debates. Gut checking minimizes it long term by reducing the number of debates resolved on blippy, dropped spikes. I'm reading a stock aff at the core of the lit, and it's on the wiki.==== 18 + 19 + 20 +====5. Independently, voting on theory encourages more frivolous theory in future rounds which crowds out topic education. Any aff abuse must be weighed against this innate DA to theory, which sets a non-arbitrary brightline for reasonability.==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-29 23:00:05.129 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - FW - Theory Deterrence UV - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any