| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,49 @@ |
|
1 |
+==Utilitarianism FW== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+====The standard is maximizing utility. ==== |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+====First, reductionism.==== |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+====Brain studies prove personal identity doesn't exist. ==== |
|
11 |
+**Parfit 84**^^^^Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984). – Hebron AL |
|
12 |
+Some recent medical cases provide striking evidence in favour of the Reductionist View. Human |
|
13 |
+AND |
|
14 |
+, and can receive two different answers written by this person's two hands. |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+====In the absence of personal identity, only end states can matter ==== |
|
18 |
+**Shoemaker 99**^^^^Shoemaker, David (Dept of Philosophy, U Memphis). "Utilitarianism and Personal Identity." The Journal of Value Inquiry 33: 183–199, 1999. http://www.csun.edu/~~ds56723/jvipaper.pdf - Hebron AL |
|
19 |
+Extreme reductionism might lend support to utilitarianism in the following way. Many people claim |
|
20 |
+AND |
|
21 |
+, would be the most plausible. Utilitarianism is just such a theory. |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+====Second, moral uncertainty means that extinction comes first under any moral system.==== |
|
25 |
+**Bostrom 1**^^^^Nick Bostrom, 2001 prof of Philosophy, Oxford University ~~ Journal of Evolution and Technology, Vol. 9, March 2002. First version: 2001 March, JStor – Hebron AL |
|
26 |
+~~Brackets for clarity~~ These reflections on moral uncertainty suggest~~s~~ an |
|
27 |
+AND |
|
28 |
+to increase the probability that the future will contain a lot of value. |
|
29 |
+ |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+====Third, respect for human worth would justify util. ==== |
|
32 |
+**Cummiskey 90**^^^^Cummiskey, David. Associate professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago. "Kantian Consequentiaism." Ethics 100 (April 1990), University of Chicago. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381810 - Hebron AL |
|
33 |
+We must not obscure the issue by characterizing this type of case as the sacrifice |
|
34 |
+AND |
|
35 |
+a fundamental equality that dictates that some must sometimes give way for the sake |
|
36 |
+ |
|
37 |
+ |
|
38 |
+====Fourth, the very nature of the US government is to maximize utility. ==== |
|
39 |
+**Abraham Lincoln 1864**^^^^Lincoln, Abraham (16^^th^^ President of the US, Solid beard, Stopped slavery, Posthumous National Wrestling Hall of Fame inductee). Letter to A.G. Hodges. 4 April 1864. – Hebron AL |
|
40 |
+I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is |
|
41 |
+AND |
|
42 |
+should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution all together. |
|
43 |
+ |
|
44 |
+ |
|
45 |
+====Fifth, universalizability justifies util. ==== |
|
46 |
+**Singer 93**^^^^Peter Singer, "Practical Ethics," Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 13-14 – Hebron AL |
|
47 |
+The universal aspect of ethics, I suggest, does provide a persuasive, although |
|
48 |
+AND |
|
49 |
+the course of action most likely to maximize the interests of those affected. |