Changes for page Hebron Lalani Aff
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 8 added, 11 removed)
- Caselist.CitesClass[14]
- Caselist.CitesClass[15]
- Caselist.CitesClass[16]
- Caselist.CitesClass[17]
- Caselist.CitesClass[18]
- Caselist.CitesClass[19]
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
- Caselist.RoundClass[10]
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
- Caselist.RoundClass[14]
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
- Caselist.CitesClass[10]
- Caselist.CitesClass[11]
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ 1 1 =Shmoney Team AC= 2 2 3 +(Trash AC, Never going to run it again) 3 3 4 - 5 5 ====Plan Text: The United States Federal Government ought to limit Qualified Immunity for Police Officers. ==== 6 6 7 7 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-11- 2001:22:07.01 +2016-11-16 02:58:08.0 - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - 111 +8
- Caselist.CitesClass[15]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,3 +1,0 @@ 1 -If I haven't disclosed which is highly unlikely, ask me before our round and I'll be more than happy to inform you. If you have any questions, concerns, feel free to contact me at lalanidebate@gmail.com 2 - 3 -I disclose on behalf of the Hebron High School LD team so whoever you hit most probably runs the same things as me. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-20 01:25:17.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -12 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - Contact - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone
- Caselist.CitesClass[16]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,20 +1,0 @@ 1 -==Structural Violence FW== 2 -====Resisting Structural Violence has to come first in debate round. ==== 3 -**Wise 8** Tim Wise 8 (Race Relations Specialist, Activst, Orator), White Like Me, 2008 96 - 97 – Hebron AL 4 -Until the voices of economically and racially marginalized persons are given equal weight in debate 5 -AND 6 -desperately need to listen to those who live without the luxury of blinders. 7 - 8 - 9 -====First, structural violence is based in moral exclusion, which is fundamentally flawed.==== 10 -**Winter and Leighton 99**, Deborah DuNann Winter (Psychologist) and Dana C. Leighton (PhD at University of Arkansas), 2009, "Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology in the 21st century." – Hebron AL 11 -Finally, to recognize the operation of structural violence forces us to ask questions about 12 -AND 13 -local cultures, will be our most surefooted path to building lasting peace. 14 - 15 - 16 -====Second, debate should deal with questions of real-world consequences—ideal theories ignore the concrete nature of the world and legitimize oppression.==== 17 -**Curry 14**, Dr. Tommy J. Curry (Professor at AandM), 1/2-2014, "The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century, "Victory Briefs – Hebron AL 18 -Despite the pronouncement of debate as an activity and intellectual exercise pointing to the real 19 -AND 20 -used to currently justify the living wages in under our contemporary moral parameters. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-20 01:27:12.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - FW - Structural Violence - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone
- Caselist.CitesClass[17]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,49 +1,0 @@ 1 -==Utilitarianism FW== 2 - 3 - 4 -====The standard is maximizing utility. ==== 5 - 6 - 7 -====First, reductionism.==== 8 - 9 - 10 -====Brain studies prove personal identity doesn't exist. ==== 11 -**Parfit 84** ^^^^Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984). – Hebron AL 12 -Some recent medical cases provide striking evidence in favour of the Reductionist View. Human 13 -AND 14 -, and can receive two different answers written by this person's two hands. 15 - 16 - 17 -====In the absence of personal identity, only end states can matter ==== 18 -**Shoemaker 99** ^^^^Shoemaker, David (Dept of Philosophy, U Memphis). "Utilitarianism and Personal Identity." The Journal of Value Inquiry 33: 183–199, 1999. http://www.csun.edu/~~ds56723/jvipaper.pdf - Hebron AL 19 -Extreme reductionism might lend support to utilitarianism in the following way. Many people claim 20 -AND 21 -, would be the most plausible. Utilitarianism is just such a theory. 22 - 23 - 24 -====Second, moral uncertainty means that extinction comes first under any moral system.==== 25 -**Bostrom 1** ^^^^Nick Bostrom, 2001 prof of Philosophy, Oxford University ~~ Journal of Evolution and Technology, Vol. 9, March 2002. First version: 2001 March, JStor – Hebron AL 26 -~~Brackets for clarity~~ These reflections on moral uncertainty suggest~~s~~ an 27 -AND 28 -to increase the probability that the future will contain a lot of value. 29 - 30 - 31 -====Third, respect for human worth would justify util. ==== 32 -**Cummiskey 90** ^^^^Cummiskey, David. Associate professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago. "Kantian Consequentiaism." Ethics 100 (April 1990), University of Chicago. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381810 - Hebron AL 33 -We must not obscure the issue by characterizing this type of case as the sacrifice 34 -AND 35 -a fundamental equality that dictates that some must sometimes give way for the sake 36 - 37 - 38 -====Fourth, the very nature of the US government is to maximize utility. ==== 39 -**Abraham Lincoln 1864** ^^^^Lincoln, Abraham (16^^th^^ President of the US, Solid beard, Stopped slavery, Posthumous National Wrestling Hall of Fame inductee). Letter to A.G. Hodges. 4 April 1864. – Hebron AL 40 -I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is 41 -AND 42 -should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution all together. 43 - 44 - 45 -====Fifth, universalizability justifies util. ==== 46 -**Singer 93** ^^^^Peter Singer, "Practical Ethics," Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 13-14 – Hebron AL 47 -The universal aspect of ethics, I suggest, does provide a persuasive, although 48 -AND 49 -the course of action most likely to maximize the interests of those affected. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-20 01:27:12.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - FW - Utilitarianism - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone
- Caselist.CitesClass[18]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,49 +1,0 @@ 1 -==Consequentialism FW== 2 - 3 - 4 -====The standard is consequentialism. ==== 5 - 6 - 7 -====First, reductionism.==== 8 - 9 - 10 -====Brain studies prove personal identity doesn't exist. ==== 11 -**Parfit 84** ^^^^Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984). – Hebron AL 12 -Some recent medical cases provide striking evidence in favour of the Reductionist View. Human 13 -AND 14 -, and can receive two different answers written by this person's two hands. 15 - 16 - 17 -====In the absence of personal identity, only end states can matter ==== 18 -**Shoemaker 99** ^^^^Shoemaker, David (Dept of Philosophy, U Memphis). "Utilitarianism and Personal Identity." The Journal of Value Inquiry 33: 183–199, 1999. http://www.csun.edu/~~ds56723/jvipaper.pdf - Hebron AL 19 -Extreme reductionism might lend support to utilitarianism in the following way. Many people claim 20 -AND 21 -, would be the most plausible. Utilitarianism is just such a theory. 22 - 23 - 24 -====Second, moral uncertainty means that extinction comes first under any moral system.==== 25 -**Bostrom 1** ^^^^Nick Bostrom, 2001 prof of Philosophy, Oxford University ~~ Journal of Evolution and Technology, Vol. 9, March 2002. First version: 2001 March, JStor – Hebron AL 26 -~~Brackets for clarity~~ These reflections on moral uncertainty suggest~~s~~ an 27 -AND 28 -to increase the probability that the future will contain a lot of value. 29 - 30 - 31 -====Third, respect for human worth would justify util. ==== 32 -**Cummiskey 90** ^^^^Cummiskey, David. Associate professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago. "Kantian Consequentiaism." Ethics 100 (April 1990), University of Chicago. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381810 - Hebron AL 33 -We must not obscure the issue by characterizing this type of case as the sacrifice 34 -AND 35 -a fundamental equality that dictates that some must sometimes give way for the sake 36 - 37 - 38 -====Fourth, governments have a specific obligation to be utilitarian.==== 39 -**Woller 97** BYU Prof., "An Overview by Gary Woller", A Forum on the Role of Environmental Ethics, June 1997, pg. 10 – Hebron AL 40 -~~Brackets for clarity~~ Moreover, virtually all public policies entail some redistribution of 41 -AND 42 -regulatory unreasonableness while failing to adequately address the problem or actually making it worse 43 - 44 - 45 -====Fifth, universalizability justifies util. ==== 46 -**Singer 93** ^^^^Peter Singer, "Practical Ethics," Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 13-14 – Hebron AL 47 -The universal aspect of ethics, I suggest, does provide a persuasive, although 48 -AND 49 -the course of action most likely to maximize the interests of those affected. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-20 01:27:13.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - FW - Consequentialism - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone
- Caselist.CitesClass[19]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,20 +1,0 @@ 1 -==Theory Deterrence UV== 2 - 3 - 4 -====1. Don't vote on presumption or permissibility because human fallibility means there's always a non-zero risk of offense. If you do presume, then presume aff to offset 7-4-6-3 time skew and the 8 neg bias last year^^ ^^ and at the TOC specifically^^ ^^ which impact turn his shells. TOC stats come first; they account for time skew, highest level, and all other factors to determine net effect, and analytics get overstated by debaters to win rounds. ==== 5 - 6 - 7 -====2. Neg burden is to win offense to a post-fiat advocacy. Offense-defense is key to fairness and real world education.==== 8 -**Nelson 8** Adam F. Nelson, J.D.1. Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Lincoln-Douglas Debate. 2008. – Hebron AS 9 -And the truth-statement model of the resolution imposes an absolute burden of proof 10 -AND 11 -know how the various options affect us and the world we live in. 12 - 13 - 14 -====3. The neg must defend one unconditional advocacy. Conditionality is bad because it makes the neg a moving target which kills 1AR strategy. He'll kick it if I cover it and extend it if I undercover it, meaning I have no strategic options. Also, it's unreciprocal because I can't kick the AC.==== 15 - 16 - 17 -====4. Err aff against theory. Intervention's inevitable in blippy theory debates. Gut checking minimizes it long term by reducing the number of debates resolved on blippy, dropped spikes. I'm reading a stock aff at the core of the lit, and it's on the wiki.==== 18 - 19 - 20 -====5. Independently, voting on theory encourages more frivolous theory in future rounds which crowds out topic education. Any aff abuse must be weighed against this innate DA to theory, which sets a non-arbitrary brightline for reasonability.==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-20 01:27:13.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - FW - Theory Deterrence UV - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-20 01:21:08.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Matt Dooley - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -North Crowley Tania Garcia - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,10 +1,0 @@ 1 -1AC 2 -Util FW 3 -Util AC 4 -Theory Deterrence UV 5 -(This AC is v bad I'll never run this again) 6 - 7 -1NC 8 -State Bad K 9 -Wilderson K 10 -Two DA's - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Byron Nelson TFA
- Caselist.RoundClass[10]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-20 01:21:13.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Matt Dooley - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -North Crowley Tania Garcia - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,10 +1,0 @@ 1 -1AC 2 -Util FW 3 -Util AC 4 -Theory Deterrence UV 5 -(This AC is v bad I'll never run this again) 6 - 7 -1NC 8 -State Bad K 9 -Wilderson K 10 -Two DA's - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Byron Nelson TFA
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -14 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-20 01:22:05.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Matt Dooley - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -North Crowley Tania Garcia - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,10 +1,0 @@ 1 -1AC 2 -Util FW 3 -Util AC 4 -Theory Deterrence UV 5 -(This AC is v bad I'll never run this again) 6 - 7 -1NC 8 -State Bad K 9 -Wilderson K 10 -Two DA's - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Byron Nelson TFA
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -15 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-20 01:25:16.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -16,17,18,19 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-20 01:27:10.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anyone
- Caselist.RoundClass[14]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-11 04:02:19.922 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Sims, Erdman, Boyer - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Grapevine Harrison Staley - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quarters - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,0 @@ 1 -1AC - Necropolitics 2 -1NC - K Normative Ethics DA Indemnification 3 - 4 - 5 -Voted for 1AC no Link to K or DA - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Berkner TFA
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,3 @@ 1 +If I haven't disclosed which is highly unlikely, ask me before our round and I'll be more than happy to inform you. If you have any questions, concerns, feel free to contact me at lalanidebate@gmail.com 2 + 3 +I disclose on behalf of the Hebron High School LD team so whoever you hit most probably runs the same things as me. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-04 19:33:39.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - Contact - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone
- Caselist.CitesClass[10]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,20 @@ 1 +==Structural Violence FW== 2 +====Resisting Structural Violence has to come first in debate round. ==== 3 +**Wise 8** Tim Wise 8 (Race Relations Specialist, Activst, Orator), White Like Me, 2008 96 - 97 – Hebron AL 4 +Until the voices of economically and racially marginalized persons are given equal weight in debate 5 +AND 6 +desperately need to listen to those who live without the luxury of blinders. 7 + 8 + 9 +====First, structural violence is based in moral exclusion, which is fundamentally flawed.==== 10 +**Winter and Leighton 99**, Deborah DuNann Winter (Psychologist) and Dana C. Leighton (PhD at University of Arkansas), 2009, "Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology in the 21st century." – Hebron AL 11 +Finally, to recognize the operation of structural violence forces us to ask questions about 12 +AND 13 +local cultures, will be our most surefooted path to building lasting peace. 14 + 15 + 16 +====Second, debate should deal with questions of real-world consequences—ideal theories ignore the concrete nature of the world and legitimize oppression.==== 17 +**Curry 14**, Dr. Tommy J. Curry (Professor at AandM), 1/2-2014, "The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century, "Victory Briefs – Hebron AL 18 +Despite the pronouncement of debate as an activity and intellectual exercise pointing to the real 19 +AND 20 +used to currently justify the living wages in under our contemporary moral parameters. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-29 23:17:55.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - FW - Structural Violence - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone
- Caselist.CitesClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,49 @@ 1 +==Utilitarianism FW== 2 + 3 + 4 +====The standard is maximizing utility. ==== 5 + 6 + 7 +====First, reductionism.==== 8 + 9 + 10 +====Brain studies prove personal identity doesn't exist. ==== 11 +**Parfit 84**^^^^Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984). – Hebron AL 12 +Some recent medical cases provide striking evidence in favour of the Reductionist View. Human 13 +AND 14 +, and can receive two different answers written by this person's two hands. 15 + 16 + 17 +====In the absence of personal identity, only end states can matter ==== 18 +**Shoemaker 99**^^^^Shoemaker, David (Dept of Philosophy, U Memphis). "Utilitarianism and Personal Identity." The Journal of Value Inquiry 33: 183–199, 1999. http://www.csun.edu/~~ds56723/jvipaper.pdf - Hebron AL 19 +Extreme reductionism might lend support to utilitarianism in the following way. Many people claim 20 +AND 21 +, would be the most plausible. Utilitarianism is just such a theory. 22 + 23 + 24 +====Second, moral uncertainty means that extinction comes first under any moral system.==== 25 +**Bostrom 1**^^^^Nick Bostrom, 2001 prof of Philosophy, Oxford University ~~ Journal of Evolution and Technology, Vol. 9, March 2002. First version: 2001 March, JStor – Hebron AL 26 +~~Brackets for clarity~~ These reflections on moral uncertainty suggest~~s~~ an 27 +AND 28 +to increase the probability that the future will contain a lot of value. 29 + 30 + 31 +====Third, respect for human worth would justify util. ==== 32 +**Cummiskey 90**^^^^Cummiskey, David. Associate professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago. "Kantian Consequentiaism." Ethics 100 (April 1990), University of Chicago. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381810 - Hebron AL 33 +We must not obscure the issue by characterizing this type of case as the sacrifice 34 +AND 35 +a fundamental equality that dictates that some must sometimes give way for the sake 36 + 37 + 38 +====Fourth, the very nature of the US government is to maximize utility. ==== 39 +**Abraham Lincoln 1864**^^^^Lincoln, Abraham (16^^th^^ President of the US, Solid beard, Stopped slavery, Posthumous National Wrestling Hall of Fame inductee). Letter to A.G. Hodges. 4 April 1864. – Hebron AL 40 +I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is 41 +AND 42 +should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution all together. 43 + 44 + 45 +====Fifth, universalizability justifies util. ==== 46 +**Singer 93**^^^^Peter Singer, "Practical Ethics," Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 13-14 – Hebron AL 47 +The universal aspect of ethics, I suggest, does provide a persuasive, although 48 +AND 49 +the course of action most likely to maximize the interests of those affected. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-29 23:17:55.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - FW - Utilitarianism - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,49 @@ 1 +==Consequentialism FW== 2 + 3 + 4 +====The standard is consequentialism. ==== 5 + 6 + 7 +====First, reductionism.==== 8 + 9 + 10 +====Brain studies prove personal identity doesn't exist. ==== 11 +**Parfit 84**^^^^Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984). – Hebron AL 12 +Some recent medical cases provide striking evidence in favour of the Reductionist View. Human 13 +AND 14 +, and can receive two different answers written by this person's two hands. 15 + 16 + 17 +====In the absence of personal identity, only end states can matter ==== 18 +**Shoemaker 99**^^^^Shoemaker, David (Dept of Philosophy, U Memphis). "Utilitarianism and Personal Identity." The Journal of Value Inquiry 33: 183–199, 1999. http://www.csun.edu/~~ds56723/jvipaper.pdf - Hebron AL 19 +Extreme reductionism might lend support to utilitarianism in the following way. Many people claim 20 +AND 21 +, would be the most plausible. Utilitarianism is just such a theory. 22 + 23 + 24 +====Second, moral uncertainty means that extinction comes first under any moral system.==== 25 +**Bostrom 1**^^^^Nick Bostrom, 2001 prof of Philosophy, Oxford University ~~ Journal of Evolution and Technology, Vol. 9, March 2002. First version: 2001 March, JStor – Hebron AL 26 +~~Brackets for clarity~~ These reflections on moral uncertainty suggest~~s~~ an 27 +AND 28 +to increase the probability that the future will contain a lot of value. 29 + 30 + 31 +====Third, respect for human worth would justify util. ==== 32 +**Cummiskey 90**^^^^Cummiskey, David. Associate professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago. "Kantian Consequentiaism." Ethics 100 (April 1990), University of Chicago. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381810 - Hebron AL 33 +We must not obscure the issue by characterizing this type of case as the sacrifice 34 +AND 35 +a fundamental equality that dictates that some must sometimes give way for the sake 36 + 37 + 38 +====Fourth, governments have a specific obligation to be utilitarian.==== 39 +**Woller 97** BYU Prof., "An Overview by Gary Woller", A Forum on the Role of Environmental Ethics, June 1997, pg. 10 – Hebron AL 40 +~~Brackets for clarity~~ Moreover, virtually all public policies entail some redistribution of 41 +AND 42 +regulatory unreasonableness while failing to adequately address the problem or actually making it worse 43 + 44 + 45 +====Fifth, universalizability justifies util. ==== 46 +**Singer 93**^^^^Peter Singer, "Practical Ethics," Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 13-14 – Hebron AL 47 +The universal aspect of ethics, I suggest, does provide a persuasive, although 48 +AND 49 +the course of action most likely to maximize the interests of those affected. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-29 23:17:55.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - FW - Consequentialism - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,20 @@ 1 +==Theory Deterrence UV== 2 + 3 + 4 +====1. Don't vote on presumption or permissibility because human fallibility means there's always a non-zero risk of offense. If you do presume, then presume aff to offset 7-4-6-3 time skew and the 8 neg bias last year^^ ^^ and at the TOC specifically^^ ^^ which impact turn his shells. TOC stats come first; they account for time skew, highest level, and all other factors to determine net effect, and analytics get overstated by debaters to win rounds. ==== 5 + 6 + 7 +====2. Neg burden is to win offense to a post-fiat advocacy. Offense-defense is key to fairness and real world education.==== 8 +Nelson 8 Adam F. Nelson, J.D.1. Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Lincoln-Douglas Debate. 2008. – Hebron AS 9 +And the truth-statement model of the resolution imposes an absolute burden of proof 10 +AND 11 +know how the various options affect us and the world we live in. 12 + 13 + 14 +====3. The neg must defend one unconditional advocacy. Conditionality is bad because it makes the neg a moving target which kills 1AR strategy. He'll kick it if I cover it and extend it if I undercover it, meaning I have no strategic options. Also, it's unreciprocal because I can't kick the AC.==== 15 + 16 + 17 +====4. Err aff against theory. Intervention's inevitable in blippy theory debates. Gut checking minimizes it long term by reducing the number of debates resolved on blippy, dropped spikes. I'm reading a stock aff at the core of the lit, and it's on the wiki.==== 18 + 19 + 20 +====5. Independently, voting on theory encourages more frivolous theory in future rounds which crowds out topic education. Any aff abuse must be weighed against this innate DA to theory, which sets a non-arbitrary brightline for reasonability.==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-29 23:17:55.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hebron Lalani Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - FW - Theory Deterrence UV - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-04 19:33:37.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +10,11,12,13 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-29 23:17:37.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anyone
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +14 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-16 02:58:04.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Matt Dooley - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +North Crowley Tania Garcia - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,10 @@ 1 +1AC 2 +Util FW 3 +Util AC 4 +Theory Deterrence UV 5 +(This AC is v bad I'll never run this again) 6 + 7 +1NC 8 +State Bad K 9 +Wilderson K 10 +Two DA's - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Byron Nelson TFA