| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,27 @@ |
|
1 |
+Public Universities and colleges should establish restrictions on hate speech consistent with Byrne’s proposal. This includes restrictions on otherwise protected free speech. They will remove all other restrictions on protected free speech. Byrne 91 |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Byrne, J. Peter. Associate Professor, Georgetown University Law Center. "Racial Insults and Free Speech Within the University." Geo. LJ 79 (1990): 399. |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+This article … others and informed judgment. 3 |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+The counterplan establishes checks on reverse enforcement, chilling effect, and slippery slope. Byrne ‘91 |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+Byrne, J. Peter. Associate Professor, Georgetown University Law Center. "Racial Insults and Free Speech Within the University." Geo. LJ 79 (1990): 399. |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+Disciplinary rules are … and hurtful¶ ranting. |
|
12 |
+Hate speech degrades minorities, locking in the squo and ensuring their failure. Delgado 2k |
|
13 |
+Richard Delgado - Charles Inglis Thomson Professor of Law, University of Colorado. J.D., U. California-Berkeley, 1974. “TOWARD A LEGAL REALIST VIEW OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT.” Harvard Law Review. January 2000. JJN |
|
14 |
+B. Hate Speech as … across large groups. |
|
15 |
+And hate speech primes society for genocide – multiple empirical examples prove. Tsesis 09 |
|
16 |
+Tsesis, Alexander Loyola University Chicago School of Law. "Dignity and speech: The regulation of hate speech in a democracy." (2009). |
|
17 |
+Permitting persons or …¶ principles of democracy. |
|
18 |
+Hate speech does real violence that makes college unbearable. Delgado and Stefacic ‘09 |
|
19 |
+Richard Delgado - University Professor, Seattle University School of Law; J.D., 1974, University of California, Berkeley. Jean Stefancic – Research Professor, Seattle University School of Law; M.A., 1989, University of San Francisco. “FOUR OBSERVATIONS ABOUT HATE SPEECH.” WAKE FOREST LAW REVIEW. 2009. http://wakeforestlawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Delgado_LawReview_01.09.pdf |
|
20 |
+II. OBSERVATION NUMBER TWO: THE EVALUATION OF HARMS HAS BEEN INCOMPLETE One way, of course, to … system of free expression.111 |
|
21 |
+First, unrestricted speech creates a chilling effect where people are terrified to speak out. This has the effect of creating less dialogue. Inbger 84 |
|
22 |
+Stanley Ingber, THE MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS: A LEGITIMIZING MYTH, Duke Law Review, February 1984 EE |
|
23 |
+The clear and … to established norms |
|
24 |
+Free expression devalues minority speech and makes it hard for them to speak out. Delgado and Stefancic 92 |
|
25 |
+Delgado, Richard and Stefancic, Jean. September 1992. “Images of the Outsider in American Law and Culture: Can Free Expression Remedy Systemic Social Ills”. Volume 77 Issue 6 http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.946.7275andrep=rep1andtype=pdf SMN |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+A free market … a welcome 'exception'!" |