Changes for page Harvard Westlake Panda Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:36
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[44]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-04-27 21:49:03. 3591 +2017-04-27 21:49:03.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[51]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,16 @@ 1 +Interp: The affirmative must disclose the plan text and advantage area if they break new at the toc when pairings are released. Or at coin flip 2 + 3 + 4 +Standard – 5 + 6 +1. Clash 7 + 8 +2. Discourages tricks 9 + 10 +Vote on substantive engagement: otherwise we’re speaking without debating and there’s nothing to separate us from dueling oratory. It also creates the most valuable long-term skills since we need to learn how to defend our beliefs in any context, like politics. 11 + 12 +Drop the debater on new affs: Their lack of disclosure makes substance irreparable b/c our entire argument is that we did not have a basis to engage the aff to begin with. 13 + 14 +Competing interps since reasonability invites arbitrary judge intervention based on preference rather than argumentation and encourages a race to the bottom in which debaters exploit a judge’s tolerance for questionable argumentation. 15 + 16 +No RVIs - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-27 21:49:06.358 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +XX - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +XX - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +44 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard Westlake Panda Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Theory - New AFFs Bad - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +TOC