| ... |
... |
@@ -1,65
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-Chronicle AC |
| 2 |
|
-Part 1 is Framing |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-Methodological pluralism is necessary for effective critique and is key to avoiding endless political violence in academia. Bleiker 14 |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
-Bleiker 14 – (6/17, Roland, Professor of International Relations at the University of Queensland, "International Theory Between Reification and Self-Reflective Critique," International Studies Review, Volume 16, Issue 2, pages 325–327). NS |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-Free speech is a pre-requisite to any rational moral system- without it self-realization is impossible. Eberle 94 |
| 10 |
|
-Eberle, Law @ Roger Williams, 94 (Wake Forest LR, Winter) |
| 11 |
|
- |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-Epistemic humility demands free speech. Dalmia, 9/22 |
| 14 |
|
-(Shikha, Senior Analyst/Award winning Journalist http://reason.com/blog/2016/09/22/debating-nyus-jeremy-waldron-on-free-spe) |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-Consequentially, Free speech is a gateway to every other impact. D’Souza 96 |
| 18 |
|
-(Frances, Prof. Anthropology Oxford, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/hearings/19960425/droi/freedom_en.htm?textMode=on) |
| 19 |
|
- |
| 20 |
|
- |
| 21 |
|
-Plan Text: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected journalist speech. |
| 22 |
|
- |
| 23 |
|
-Part 2 is Stop The Press |
| 24 |
|
- |
| 25 |
|
-Censorship of student journalism is increasing at the worst possible time. Censorship discourages questioning the government. Schuman 12/8 |
| 26 |
|
-(Rebecca, http://www.slate.com/articles/life/education/2016/12/student_journalists_are_under_threat.html) |
| 27 |
|
- |
| 28 |
|
-The legal justification for newspaper censorship is a 7th circuit decision that applied Hazelwood to universities-this allows unchecked arbitrary censorship by administrators. Goodman 05 |
| 29 |
|
-( S. Mark Goodman, Michael C. Hiestand, Student Press Law Center 2005 WL 2736314 (U.S.) (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) Supreme Court of the United States. Margaret L. HOSTY, Jeni S. Porche, and Steven P. Barba, Petitioners, v. Patricia CARTER, Respondent. No. 05-377. October 20, 2005. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Brief of Amici Curiae Student Press Law Center, Associated Collegiate Press, College Media Advisers, Community College Journalism Association, Society for Collegiate Journalists, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, American Society of Newspaper Editors, National Newspaper Association, Newspaper Association of America, Society of Professional Journalists, Associated Press Managing Editors, College Newspaper Business and Advertising Managers, National Federation of Press Women, National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association and the Independent Press Association/Campus Journalism Project in Support of Petition of Margaret L. Hosty, Jeni S. Porche, and Steven P. Barba for Writ of Certiorari Of Counsel: S. Mark Goodman, Michael C. Hiestand, Student Press Law Center, 1101 Wilson Blvd., Ste 1100, Arlington, VA 22209-2211, (703) 807-1904. Richard M. Goehler, (Counsel of Record), Frost Brown Todd LLC, 2200 PNC Center, 201 East Fifth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, (513) 651-6800, Counsel for Amici Curiae.) |
| 30 |
|
- |
| 31 |
|
-Regulation of newspapers is a crucial precedent used to justify widespread campus censorship-it uniquely empowers and protects administrators to censor. Lukianoff 05 |
| 32 |
|
-(George, Samantha Harris, Foundation for Individual, Rights in Education, 2005 WL 2736313 (U.S.) (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) Supreme Court of the United States. Margaret L. HOSTY et al., Petitioners, v. Patricia CARTER, Respondent. No. 05-377. October 19, 2005. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Brief Amici Curiae of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education; The Coalition for Student and Academic Rights; Feminists for Free Expression; The First Amendment Project; Ifeminists.Net; National Association of Scholars; Accuracy in Academia; Leadership Institute; The Individual Rights Foundation; The American Council of Trustees and Alumni; and Students for Academic Freedom in Support of Petitioners) |
| 33 |
|
- |
| 34 |
|
-The plan promotes activism and actively encourages dissent. Status quo Hosty decisions give a green light to admin involvement in all forms of politics. This censorship depoliticizes young people and spills into their future politics. Sanders 06 |
| 35 |
|
-Chris Sanders Jd Censorship 101: Anti-Hazelwood Laws and the Preservation of Free Speech at Colleges and Universities 58 Ala. L. Rev. 159, 2006 |
| 36 |
|
-*Bracketed for ableist language |
| 37 |
|
- |
| 38 |
|
- |
| 39 |
|
-Part 3 is Civic Engagement |
| 40 |
|
- |
| 41 |
|
-Civic engagement is low now – post election polls and tech. Fate 1/11 |
| 42 |
|
-Tom Montgomery Fate is a graduate of the Iowa nonfiction writing program and teaches creative writing at the College of DuPage in suburban Chicago, On the social conscience of nonvoting college students, USA Today Network, 1/11/17 EE |
| 43 |
|
- |
| 44 |
|
- |
| 45 |
|
-Censorship of college journalism guts civic engagement. LoMonte 12-1 |
| 46 |
|
-(Frank D., http://www.splc.org/article/2016/12/college-media-threats-report-2016) |
| 47 |
|
- |
| 48 |
|
- |
| 49 |
|
-Civic engagement is the vital internal link to solving every existential problem- its try or die for the aff. Small 06 |
| 50 |
|
-(Jonathan, former Americorps VISTA for the Human Services Coalition, “Moving Forward,” The Journal for Civic Commitment, Spring, http://www.mc.maricopa.edu/other/engagement/Journal/Issue7/Small.jsp) |
| 51 |
|
- |
| 52 |
|
-Trump victory proves the case is a disad to every K- failure to prioritize civic engagement causes rightwing takeover. Rorty 98 |
| 53 |
|
-(Richard, Stanford Philosophy Professor, Achieving Our Country, pp. 87-94) |
| 54 |
|
- |
| 55 |
|
-Part 4 is Underview |
| 56 |
|
- |
| 57 |
|
-Censorship is based in PR/funding concerns, not student wellbeing. Protest solves NC offense. Schuman 12/8 |
| 58 |
|
-(Rebecca, http://www.slate.com/articles/life/education/2016/12/student_journalists_are_under_threat.html) |
| 59 |
|
- |
| 60 |
|
-Problematic speech shouldn’t be suppressed- that magnifies the impacts-prefer my evidence because it has internal weighing. Alexander 13 |
| 61 |
|
-(Larry, Is Freedom of Expression a Universal Right San Diego Law Review Summer, 2013 San Diego Law Review 50 San Diego L. Rev. 707) |
| 62 |
|
- |
| 63 |
|
- |
| 64 |
|
-Endorsing speech doesn’t mask oppressive institutions, it’s a pre-requisite to challenging them. Redish 82 |
| 65 |
|
-(Martin H, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 130, No. 3 (Jan., 1982), pp. 591-645) |