Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[1]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[2]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[1]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-11-08 19:43:26.274
	1	+2016-11-08 19:43:26.0

Caselist.CitesClass[2]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,14 @@
	1	+Counterinterp: The AFF may limit qualified immunity by altering the clearly established element for 4th amendment cases if they have a qualified solvency advocate in the lit.
	2	+
	3	+Standards:
	4	+1. Clash – limiting qualified immunity drastically differs based on what part of it you target – specific amendments, types of cases, clearly established or reasonableness element all alter QI in radically different ways. This means plans are necessary otherwise debates become two ships passing in the night where the AFF can delink neg arguments and neg doesn’t have to respond to the specifics of the AFF. Clash key to fairness because it’s a prerequisite to either side having offense.
	5	+
	6	+2. Ground If the aff defended whole rez then they would get screwed over by tiny pics or DA’s every round, which flips and outweighs limits A. The neg’s reactive so they can tailor their args – I’ve already read the AC when they read DAs so I can’t adapt it in the 1AR B. Neg gets generics and the NR collapse so it’s worse for the aff to have to prep every DA.
	7	+
	8	+Advocacy skills is the ultimate purpose of debate and outweighs theirs since it’s key to long-term skills and defending what we believe in – fairness of this one round is less important than the knowledge we apply outside.
	9	+And uniqueness overwhelms the link on fairness – time skew, coach disparities, and monetary inequities means the round is never fair
	10	+
	11	+A2 Limits:
	12	+1. Qualified immunity is a super small topic – there aren’t that many possible AFF’s, do some prep.
	13	+
	14	+2. Excessive force/4th amendment solves – current protests and dialogue on CJS proves it’s a major area of scholarship on the topic. Especially true cause res is specific to police.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-11-08 19:43:26.552

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+University HS, JC

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harvard Westlake Mork Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+NOVDEC A2 Subsets Theory

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Damus