Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[0]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[0]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-03-17 18:37:00.653

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+NA

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+NA

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

RoundReport

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,72 @@
	1	+Public Universities and colleges should establish restrictions on hate speech consistent with Byrnes proposal This includes restrictions on otherwise protected free speech They will remove all other restrictions on protected free speech Byrne 91
	2	+
	3	+Byrne J Peter Associate Professor Georgetown University Law Center "Racial Insults and Free Speech Within the University" Geo LJ 79 (1990) 399
	4	+
	5	+This article examinesand informed judgment 3
	6	+
	7	+The counterplan establishes checks on reverse enforcement chilling effect and slippery slope Byrne 91
	8	+
	9	+Byrne J Peter Associate Professor Georgetown University Law Center "Racial Insults and Free Speech Within the University" Geo LJ 79 (1990) 399
	10	+
	11	+Disciplinary rules areand hurtful ranting
	12	+Hate speech degrades minorities locking in the squo and ensuring their failure Delgado 2k
	13	+Richard Delgado - Charles Inglis Thomson Professor of Law University of Colorado JD U California-Berkeley 1974 TOWARD A LEGAL REALIST VIEW OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT Harvard Law Review January 2000 JJN
	14	+B Hate Speech asacross large groups
	15	+And hate speech primes society for genocide multiple empirical examples prove Tsesis 09
	16	+Tsesis Alexander Loyola University Chicago School of Law "Dignity and speech The regulation of hate speech in a democracy" (2009)
	17	+Permitting persons orprinciples of democracy
	18	+
	19	+AFF Advantage Add-Ons
	20	+CRT Framing Add-On
	21	+Standpoint epistemology is the best starting point for moral decisions other methods exclude some viewpoints which makes true analysis of reality impossible Mills 5
	22	+* - Dominant narratives shape whats counted as real ethics so the standpoint of the oppressed is more likely correct better starting point
	23	+**Edited for ableist language
	24	+Charles Mills Ideal Theory as Ideology 2005 NS
	25	+
	26	+The crucial commonmale-dominated philosophical literature
	27	+
	28	+Therefore we should recognize the way racism taints claims for ideological purity Only centering the debate from the view point of the oppressed is equality possible Bell 92
	29	+Derrick Bell Weld Professor of Law Harvard University Law School Visiting Professor New York University Law School 1991-92 school year RACIAL REALISM Connecticut Law Review Winter 1992 httpliberalartsiupuiedumpsgEssaysBell20-20Racial20Realismpdf JJN
	30	+As a veteranis never overcome
	31	+
	32	+Thus the standard is resisting racism
	33	+
	34	+And this comes before their framework
	35	+
	36	+A) A refusal to recognize the way race effects free speech downplay the importance of racism and should lose them this debate Lopez 03
	37	+
	38	+Lpez Gerardo R University of Utah Salt Lake City "The (racially neutral) politics of education A critical race theory perspective" Educational Administration Quarterly 391 (2003) 68-94
	39	+
	40	+How could Schattschneiderlarger social order
	41	+
	42	+B) Their lack of minority voices is a conscious choice - Delgado 84
	43	+
	44	+Delgado Richard "The imperial scholar Reflections on a review of civil rights literature" University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1323 (1984) 561-578
	45	+
	46	+
	47	+It does notno such tradition23
	48	+
	49	+
	50	+
	51	+Impacts
	52	+I VTL
	53	+
	54	+Racism destroys self-worth and dignity of those attacked Post 91
	55	+ROBERT C POST - Professor of Law School of Law (Boalt Hall) University of California at Berkeley BA Harvard College 1969 JD Yale University 1977 PhD Harvard University 1980 RACIST SPEECH DEMOCRACY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT William and Mary Law Review 1991 httpscholarshiplawwmeducgiviewcontentcgiarticle=1924context=wmlr JJN
	56	+C Harm to Individualsits abusive nature3 9
	57	+
	58	+
	59	+I Marketplace of Ideas
	60	+Racism harms the marketplace of ideas turns the AC Post 91
	61	+ROBERT C POST - Professor of Law School of Law (Boalt Hall) University of California at Berkeley BA Harvard College 1969 JD Yale University 1977 PhD Harvard University 1980 RACIST SPEECH DEMOCRACY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT William and Mary Law Review 1991 httpscholarshiplawwmeducgiviewcontentcgiarticle=1924context=wmlr JJN
	62	+D Harm to thestigmatizing victim groups
	63	+
	64	+I Deontology
	65	+Racism is rejected by deontic ideals Post 91
	66	+ROBERT C POST - Professor of Law School of Law (Boalt Hall) University of California at Berkeley BA Harvard College 1969 JD Yale University 1977 PhD Harvard University 1980 RACIST SPEECH DEMOCRACY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT William and Mary Law Review 1991 httpscholarshiplawwmeducgiviewcontentcgiarticle=1924context=wmlr JJN
	67	+A The Intrinsic Harmof racial inferiority"25
	68	+
	69	+I Education
	70	+Racism interferes with and harms education Post 91
	71	+ROBERT C POST - Professor of Law School of Law (Boalt Hall) University of California at Berkeley BA Harvard College 1969 JD Yale University 1977 PhD Harvard University 1980 RACIST SPEECH DEMOCRACY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT William and Mary Law Review 1991 httpscholarshiplawwmeducgiviewcontentcgiarticle=1924context=wmlr JJN
	72	+E Harm to Educationalseek to instill5

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+NA