Changes for page Harvard Westlake Enge Neg
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Attachments (0 modified, 0 added, 7 removed)
- Harvard Westlake-Enge-Neg-Berkeley-Doubles.docx
- Harvard Westlake-Enge-Neg-Berkeley-Round1.docx
- Harvard Westlake-Enge-Neg-Berkeley-Round4.docx
- Harvard Westlake-Enge-Neg-Berkeley-Round6.docx
- Harvard Westlake-Enge-Neg-Emory-Round6.docx
- Harvard Westlake-Enge-Neg-USC-Round2.docx
- Harvard Westlake-Enge-Neg-USC-Round6.docx
-
Objects (17 modified, 0 added, 18 removed)
- Caselist.CitesClass[48]
- Caselist.CitesClass[49]
- Caselist.CitesClass[50]
- Caselist.CitesClass[51]
- Caselist.CitesClass[52]
- Caselist.CitesClass[53]
- Caselist.CitesClass[54]
- Caselist.CitesClass[55]
- Caselist.CitesClass[56]
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
- Caselist.RoundClass[37]
- Caselist.RoundClass[39]
- Caselist.RoundClass[41]
- Caselist.RoundClass[42]
- Caselist.RoundClass[43]
- Caselist.RoundClass[46]
- Caselist.RoundClass[47]
- Caselist.RoundClass[48]
- Caselist.RoundClass[49]
- Caselist.RoundClass[50]
- Caselist.RoundClass[51]
- Caselist.RoundClass[52]
- Caselist.RoundClass[54]
- Caselist.RoundClass[55]
- Caselist.RoundClass[56]
- Caselist.RoundClass[57]
- Caselist.RoundClass[58]
- Caselist.RoundClass[60]
- Caselist.RoundClass[61]
- Caselist.RoundClass[62]
- Caselist.RoundClass[63]
- Caselist.RoundClass[64]
- Caselist.RoundClass[65]
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - xwiki:XWiki.Admin1 +XWiki.cengel1@hwemailcom
- Harvard Westlake-Enge-Neg-Berkeley-Doubles.docx
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.cengel1@hwemailcom - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -297.2 KB - Content
- Harvard Westlake-Enge-Neg-Berkeley-Round1.docx
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.cengel1@hwemailcom - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -309.1 KB - Content
- Harvard Westlake-Enge-Neg-Berkeley-Round4.docx
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.cengel1@hwemailcom - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -300.5 KB - Content
- Harvard Westlake-Enge-Neg-Berkeley-Round6.docx
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.cengel1@hwemailcom - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -293.1 KB - Content
- Harvard Westlake-Enge-Neg-Emory-Round6.docx
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.cengel1@hwemailcom - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -294.2 KB - Content
- Harvard Westlake-Enge-Neg-USC-Round2.docx
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.cengel1@hwemailcom - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -285.0 KB - Content
- Harvard Westlake-Enge-Neg-USC-Round6.docx
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.cengel1@hwemailcom - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -250.0 KB - Content
- Caselist.CitesClass[48]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,37 +1,0 @@ 1 -Reform within the corporatized university is impossible – the university is built to make speech seem effective, when in reality the university plays a central role in the knowledge is turned into a commodity. Only a direct and unflinching critique of class can solve. Monzó 14 2 -Monzó, Lilia D Chapman University, California, United States. "A critical pedagogy for democracy: Confronting higher education’s neoliberal agenda with a critical Latina feminist episteme." Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies (JCEPS) 12.1 (2014): 73-100. 3 - 4 -In this contradictory... interests (Giroux, 2009). 5 - 6 -This turns the case – supporting neoliberalism makes radical academic work impossible. Chatterjee and Maira 14 7 -Chatterjee, Piya, and Sunaina Maira. "The Imperial University: race, war, and the nation-state." The imperial university: Academic repression and scholarly dissent (2014): 1-50. 8 - 9 -Our geopolitical positions... U.S. university system.11 10 - 11 -Free speech is an illusion propagated by corporatists – their model of rights assumes an equal playing field analogous to free market economists view of capital. The promotion of free speech perpetuates the idea that speech is a commodity, which strengthens neoliberalism’s hold on the academy. Brown 15 12 -Brown, Wendy. Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism's stealth revolution. MIT Press, 2015. 13 - 14 -At times, kennedy... a neoliberal economy. 15 - 16 -Protests are a ruse – they are a reactive form of politics that focuses purely on affect and cedes institutional politics. Srniceke 15 17 -Srnicek, PHD, and Williams, PhD Candidate , 15 18 -(Nick, PhD IR @LSE, Alex, Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a world without work) 19 - 20 -Today it appears...‘folk-political’ thinking. (5-9) 21 - 22 -Our critique independently outweighs the case - neoliberalism causes extinction and massive social inequalities – the affs single issue legalistic solution is the exact kind of politics neolib wants us to engage in so the root cause to go unquestioned. Farbod 15 23 - ( Faramarz Farbod , PhD Candidate @ Rutgers, Prof @ Moravian College, Monthly Review, http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2015/farbod020615.html, 6-2) 24 - 25 -Global capitalism is... of no return. 26 - 27 -We control the internal link to aff impacts. Capitalism justifies securitized logic by othering those who supposedly endanger a system of capital. 28 -The alternative is a relentless class-based politics that works against the university’s economic underpinnings – only engaging in a critique that focuses on the economic forces at play in public universities can we resolve capitalism. Oparah 14 29 -Oparah, Julia. Professor and Chair of Ethnic Studies at Mills College and a founding member of Black Women Birthing Justice "Challenging Complicity: The Neoliberal University and the Prison–Industrial Complex." The Imperial University: Academic Repression and Scholarly Dissent (2014). 30 - 31 -¶ In my earlier... and college budgets. 32 - 33 -The role of the judge is to be a critical analyst testing whether the underlying assumptions of the AFF are valid. This is a question of the whether the AFF scholarship is good – not the passage of the plan. 34 -Neoliberalism operates through a narrow vision of politics that sustains itself through the illusion of pragmatism. Our alt includes policy goals but we should refuse their narrow demand for a fiated plan. Blalock, JD, 2015 35 -(Corinne, “NEOLIBERALISM AND THE CRISIS OF LEGAL THEORY”, Duke University, LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS Vol. 77:71) MG from file 36 - 37 -RECOVERING LEGAL THEORY’S... is no alternative. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-18 21:33:36.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Tim Alderete - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harker KS - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -56 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard Westlake Enge Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Jan-Feb - K - Cap v4 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Berkeley
- Caselist.CitesClass[49]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,36 +1,0 @@ 1 -Neoliberalism makes meaningful dissent impossible – there is no such thing as speaking out when the academy is controlled by money. Chatterjee and Maira 14 2 -Chatterjee, Piya, and Sunaina Maira. "The Imperial University: race, war, and the nation-state." The imperial university: Academic repression and scholarly dissent (2014): 1-50. 3 - 4 -Our geopolitical position... U.S. university system.11 5 - 6 -A focus on speech abstracts from material violence and class - the aff fails to correctly situate speech and anti-zionism within the correct economic context. Nair 11 7 -Nair, Yasmin. "WHO LOVES TEACHING? FREE SPEECH AND THE MYTH OF THE ACADEMY AS A PLACE TO LOVE AND BE THE LEFT." Arab Studies Quarterly 33.3/4 (2011): 204-216. 8 - 9 -Along the way,... its very existence 10 - 11 -And, BDS perpetuates neoliberalism and diverts resistance from the most meaningful political ways to reject Zionism. The AFF’s use of boycott is a naïve form of politics that does more harm than good. Any awareness raised directly tradesoff with effective politics. Desimone 14 12 -ARTURO DESIMONE writer and visual artist living between Argentina and the Netherlands. 27 September 2014 Critique of the boycott divestment sanctions movement, from a Jewish supporter of the Palestinian cause https://www.opendemocracy.net/arab-awakening/arturo-desimone/critique-of-boycott-divestment-sanctions-movement-from-jewish-support 13 - 14 -Today they are... domination over Palestinians. 15 - 16 -Cap is the root cause of Palestinian oppression, focus on Zionism through BDS obscures solutions to the conflict. IPS 80 17 -“Capitalism, Not Zionism, Is the Problem.” Journal of Palestine Studies, vol. 9, no. 2, 1980, pp. 154–157. Institute for Palestine Studies (IPS). www.jstor.org/stable/2536358. 18 - 19 - “Thus, Zionism, ironically... here at home." 20 - 21 -Our critique independently outweighs the case - neoliberalism causes extinction and massive social inequalities – the affs single issue legalistic solution is the exact kind of politics neolib wants us to engage in so the root cause to go unquestioned. Farbod 15 22 - ( Faramarz Farbod , PhD Candidate @ Rutgers, Prof @ Moravian College, Monthly Review, http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2015/farbod020615.html, 6-2) 23 - 24 -Global capitalism is... of no return. 25 - 26 -The alternative is a relentless class-based politics that works against the university’s economic underpinnings – only engaging in a critique that focuses on the economic forces at play in public universities can we resolve capitalism. Oparah 14 27 -Oparah, Julia. Professor and Chair of Ethnic Studies at Mills College and a founding member of Black Women Birthing Justice "Challenging Complicity: The Neoliberal University and the Prison–Industrial Complex." The Imperial University: Academic Repression and Scholarly Dissent (2014). 28 - 29 -¶ In my earlier... and college budgets. 30 - 31 -The role of the judge is to be a critical analyst testing whether the underlying assumptions of the AFF are valid. This is a question of the whether the AFF scholarship is good – not the passage of the plan. 32 - 33 -So, reject attempts at single legalistic solutions – this is the exact way of thinking neoliberalism perpetuates Blalock, JD, 2015 34 -(Corinne, “NEOLIBERALISM AND THE CRISIS OF LEGAL THEORY”, Duke University, LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS Vol. 77:71) MG from file 35 - 36 -RECOVERING LEGAL THEORY’S... is no alternative. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-19 17:20:17.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Sunhee Simon - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Loyola GR - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -57 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard Westlake Enge Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Jan-Feb - K - BDS Cap - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Berkeley
- Caselist.CitesClass[50]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,14 +1,0 @@ 1 -UN Security Council vote put US-Israeli relations on the brink Collinson et al 12/24 2 -“US abstains as UN demands end to Israeli settlements,” Stephen Collinson, David Wright, Elise Labott, 12/24/16, CNN. 3 - 4 -The United States... wrote on Twitter. 5 - 6 -BDS harms future US-Israeli relations, indicates lack of trust in future of country 7 -“Heed the storm warnings in U.S.-Israel relationship,” Mike Abrams, 10/10/16. http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/op-ed/article107403007.html#storylink=cpy 8 - 9 -In the United... peace with Palestine. 10 - 11 -A strong US-Israel alliance is key to Middle East stability, Middle East nuke war, counterterrorism, US heg, cybertech, US competitiveness, and food security. Eisenstadt 15 12 -Resetting the U.S.-Israel Alliance, Michael Eisenstadt (Kahn Fellow and director of the Military and Security Studies Program at The Washington Institute), 2/05/15, The Washington Institute http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/resetting-the-u.s.-israel-alliance 13 - 14 -Klass takes a... negotiations with Iran. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-19 17:22:04.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Sunhee Simon - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Loyola GR - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -58 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard Westlake Enge Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Jan-Feb - DA - US Relations - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Berkeley
- Caselist.CitesClass[51]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,40 +1,0 @@ 1 -The 1AC perpetuates the exact abstraction that recreates anti-black violence by ignoring the underlying antagonism inherent to its structure – asking historically racist institutions to try and fix problems is blind optimism that dooms them to recreate anti-blackness. Curry 13 2 -Dr. Tommy J. Curry 13, Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Texas AandM, "In the Fiat of Dreams: The Delusional Allure of Hope, the Reality of Anti-Black Violence and the Demands of the Anti-Ethical", 2013. CC 3 - 4 -Despite the rhetorical... integrated into society. 5 - 6 -The culture of exclusion and lack of engagement with important conversations about race in status quo LD locks minority debaters out of the discussion. Smith 13 7 -Elijah Smith (2013 Cross Examination Debate Association (CEDA) and National Debate Tournament (NDT) champion), A Conversation in Ruins: Race and Black Participation in Lincoln Douglas Debate, Vbriefly, 2013. NS 8 - 9 -At every tournament... ranks of competition. 10 - 11 -Their framework arguments are another link – their ethics are colorblind and abstract from reality in a way in a way that is inaccessible to oppressed bodies – they serve as another hoop to jump through before we can engage in racism and are exactly what keeps that oppression prevalent. Curry 2 12 -Dr. Tommy J. Curry 13, Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Texas AandM, "In the Fiat of Dreams: The Delusional Allure of Hope, the Reality of Anti-Black Violence and the Demands of the Anti-Ethical", 2013. CC 13 - 14 - In the post-structuralist... death of Blacks. 15 - 16 -Practical reason and rationality are racist and serve to justify domination of minority groups. Minnich 17 -Elizabeth Kamarck Minnich Senior Scholar, Association of American Colleges and Universities, Ph.D., Philosophy. Graduate Faculty of Political and Social Science, The New School for Social Research, Transforming Knowledge, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press (2005). p. 159 18 - 19 -But here we... ‘kinds’ of people. 20 - 21 -The 1AC’s colorblindness is itself a form of racism – it acts to shut off conversations about oppression and only allows the voices of whites to be heard. Williams 22 -Monica Williams, "Colorblind Ideology Is a Form of Racism," Psychology Today http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/colorblind/201112/colorblind-ideology-is-form-racism, December 27, 2011. 23 - 24 -Racial issues are... as a whole. 25 - 26 - 27 -Thus the alternative is to embrace anti-ethics; we must refuse the notion that historically racist institutions can help minorities and stop exploitation—fiat is illusory, so we need to destroy and demystify the concept of the white man and white virtue. Curry 3 28 -Dr. Tommy J. Curry 13, Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Texas AandM, "In the Fiat of Dreams: The Delusional Allure of Hope, the Reality of Anti-Black Violence and the Demands of the Anti-Ethical", 2013. CC 29 - 30 -The shift out... a new humanity. 31 - 32 -The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater that best deconstructs power relations – pedagogical contexts like debate are uniquely political and your ballot promotes a true opportunity for change. Trifonas 33 -Trifonas, Peter. PEDAGOGIES OF DIFFERENCE: RETHINKING EDUCATION FOR SOCIAL CHANGE. New York, London. 2003. 34 - 35 -Domination and subordination... for our children. 36 - 37 -The aff’s attempt to whitewash history by ignoring the racist foundations that underlie their theory allows for racial domination to remain invisible – you as a judge must reject the aff’s epistemology and acknowledge the reality of oppression. That’s a voting issue. Leonardo 38 -Leonardo, Zeus. "The souls of white folk: Critical pedagogy, whiteness studies, and globalization discourse." Race, ethnicity and education 5.1 (2002): 29-50. CC 39 - 40 -The fragmenting effects... sign of sameness. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-20 05:09:56.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Jack Coyle - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Palo Alto FZ - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -60 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard Westlake Enge Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - K - Anti-Ethics - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Berkeley
- Caselist.CitesClass[52]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,40 +1,0 @@ 1 -The endpoint of the 1AC is the antiblack status quo – blackness is defined in terms of an ontological structural antagonism with white civil society that is reproduced by any attempt to use existing legal structures or philosophies. Warren 13 2 -Calvin Warren, Onticide: Toward an Afro-pessimistic Queer Theory" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Studies Association Annual Meeting, 2013. NS 3 - 4 -We could suggest... field of existence. 5 - 6 -In its ontological absence the black is a fungible object open to gratuitous violence and void of relational capacity. R.L. 13 7 -R.L., WANDERINGS OF THE SLAVE: BLACK LIFE AND SOCIAL DEATH, 2013, 8 -Mute Magazine NS 9 - 10 -For the Afro-pessimists,... of black existence. 11 - 12 -The demand for legal relief is the perfection of slavery, making the slave bow down to the master. Farley 05 13 -Anthony. Prof. Farley specializes in Constitutional Law, Criminal Procedure and Legal Theory. Taught at Boston College Before Teaching at Albany “Perfecting Slavery” Page 221-222. NS 14 - 15 -Slavery is with... for an answer. 16 - 17 -Their presumptions of democratic deliberation presume that agonism exists within a range of ontological equivalency which paves over the fungible body. Brady 12 18 -(Nicholas Brady, activist scholar, executive board member of Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle, BA in philosophy from Johns Hopkins, PhD student at the University of California-Irvine Culture and Theory program, 10-26-12, “The Flesh Grinder: Prosecutorial Discretion and the Terror of Mass Incarceration,” http://academia.edu/2776507/The_Flesh_Grinder_Prosecutorial_Discretion_and_the_Quotidian_Terror_of_Mass_Incarceration) 19 - 20 -If the prosecutor... violence against blackness. 21 - 22 -Their conception of “safety” or “freedom” for racial dialogue is colorblind because it assumes equal access to discourse. Racial dialogue is only consistent with white racial frames and reinscribes the human/slave dichotomy – their reformism puts faith white people that comes back to bite us. Leonardo and Porter 10 23 -Leonardo, Zeus and Porter, Ronald K.(2010) 'Pedagogy of fear: toward a Fanonian theory of 'safety' in race dialogue', Race Ethnicity and Education, 13: 2, 139 — 157 EE 24 - 25 -Teaching race literacy... assess its consequences. 26 - 27 -The Aff’s pursuit of open dialogue is a form of ‘pseudo-humanism’ that causes material and symbolic violence to blacks and dooms any chance of fighting racism. Leonardo and Porter 10 28 -Leonardo, Zeus and Porter, Ronald K.(2010) 'Pedagogy of fear: toward a Fanonian theory of 'safety' in race dialogue', Race Ethnicity and Education, 13: 2, 139 — 157 EE 29 - 30 -Part of color-blindness... power of colonialism.1 31 - 32 -The alternative is an embrace of revolutionary violence – reject their conceptions of “protected dialogue” and affirm a telos of radical struggle. The alternative is the only ethical action – Education is key. Leonardo and Porter 10 33 -Leonardo, Zeus and Porter, Ronald K.(2010) 'Pedagogy of fear: toward a Fanonian theory of 'safety' in race dialogue', Race Ethnicity and Education, 13: 2, 139 — 157 EE 34 - 35 -Two dominant discourses... reclaiming one’s humanity 36 - 37 -Recognizing that blackness is pathologized is key to embracing social life in social death. Sexton 11 38 -Jared Sexton, ANTE-ANTI-BLACKNESS: AFTERTHOUGHTS, Cultural Studies Association Issue 1, 2011. NS 39 - 40 -Against the raceless... than" black optimism. 24 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-20 20:57:11.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Panel - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Immaculate Heart DD - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -61 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Doubles - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard Westlake Enge Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Jan-Feb - K - Afropessimism - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Berkeley
- Caselist.CitesClass[53]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,40 +1,0 @@ 1 -Neoliberalism structures academic freedom in the status quo. It sets limits on what is acceptable behavior to quell dissent and any faculty truly radical enough to challenge corporate hegemony are tossed out before they can pose a real threat. Chatterjee and Maira 14 2 -Chatterjee, Piya, and Sunaina Maira. "The Imperial University: race, war, and the nation-state." The imperial university: Academic repression and scholarly dissent (2014): 1-50. 3 - 4 -Our geopolitical positions... U.S. university system.11 5 - 6 - 7 -The problem of the neoliberal status quo is not a lack of communication, but rather the fetishization of speech. Our society has never been more democratic, which is precisely what allows capitalism to operate. Radical politics requires a rejection of democratic institutions readily available – anything short kills class focus. Dean 14 8 -Dean, Jodi. "13 After Post-Politics: Occupation and the Return of Communism." The post-political and its discontents: Spaces of depoliticization, spectres of radical politics (2014): 261. 9 - 10 -The US Left... their basic premises.¶ 11 - 12 - 13 -The AC fetishizes protest at the expense of better methods. White 11/14 14 -White, PhD, 11-14-16 15 -(Micah (is black), White received his MA and PhD (summe cum laude) in Media and Communications from the European Graduate School in Saas-Fee, Switzerland where he studied with leading philosophers Alain Badiou, Michael Hardt, Jacques Rancière, Slavoj Žižek and Avital Ronell.. He holds a BA in Philosophy with a minor in Film and Media Studies and a minor in Interpretation Theory from Swarthmore College. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/14/protests-donald-trump-democracy-party) 16 - 17 -The astonishing triumph... time to waste. 18 - 19 - 20 -Our critique independently outweighs the case - neoliberalism causes extinction and massive social inequalities – the affs single issue legalistic solution is the exact kind of politics neolib wants us to engage in so the root cause to go unquestioned. Farbod 15 21 - ( Faramarz Farbod , PhD Candidate @ Rutgers, Prof @ Moravian College, Monthly Review, http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2015/farbod020615.html, 6-2) 22 - 23 -Global capitalism is... of no return. 24 - 25 - 26 -The alternative is to abandon the affirmative’s hope for more discourse in favor of militant class struggle – rather than looking for new ways to dissent, a radical leftist project must begin with reimagining political formations outside of capitalism. The real lesson of the 60’s is that activism centered on rights is a failed project that the affirmative tries to reinvent, which will lead to the same result. Hickel 12 27 -Hickel, Jason London School of Economics and Political Science, and Arsalan Khan University of Virginia. "The culture of capitalism and the crisis of critique." Anthropological Quarterly 85.1 (2012): 203-227. 28 - 29 -We began this... of capitalist accumulation. 30 - 31 - 32 -The role of the judge is to be a critical analyst testing whether the underlying assumptions of the AFF are valid. This is a question of the whether the AFF scholarship is good – not the passage of the plan. 33 - 34 - 35 -First, neoliberalism operates through a narrow vision of politics that sustains itself through the illusion of pragmatism. We should refuse their demand for a plan. Blalock, JD, 2015 36 -(Corinne, “NEOLIBERALISM AND THE CRISIS OF LEGAL THEORY”, Duke University, LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS Vol. 77:71) MG from file 37 - 38 -RECOVERING LEGAL THEORY’S... is no alternative. 39 - 40 -Second, the knowledge claims of the AC are the jumping off point for the debate – our framework provides a more reasonable neg burden. When a student turns in an F paper, no teacher has an obligation to write an entirely new paper to show it was bad – pointing out major academic deficiencies would justify failing the paper – the ballot asks who did the better debating, so if their analysis is wrong, they haven’t. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-03-05 16:23:32.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Adam Torson - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -PV Peninsula JL - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -62 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard Westlake Enge Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Jan-Feb - K - Cap v Neolib - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -USC
- Caselist.CitesClass[54]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,60 +1,0 @@ 1 -Interpretation - The AFF may only garner offense from hypothetical enactment of the resolution 2 - 3 -This does not require the use of any particular style, type of evidence, or assumption about the role of the judge — only that the topic should determine the debate’s subject matter. Solves their method good offense – they can read __ as a framework argument to justify a topical plan, there’s no reason voting off it is key. 4 - 5 -Violation: 6 - 7 -They defend __ which isn’t the topic. 8 - 9 -Standards: 10 - 11 -1. Engagement – there are infinite non topical AFFs - a precise and predictable point of difference is key to effective dialogue. Steinberg and Freeley 13 12 -Steinberg and Freeley 13, * David, Lecturer in Communication studies and rhetoric. Advisor to Miami Urban Debate League. Director of Debate at U Miami, Former President of CEDA. And ** Austin, attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, JD, Suffolk University, Argumentation and Debate, Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 121-4. NS from file 13 - 14 -Debate is a... the guidance provided 15 - 16 -Outweighs: 17 -A. Even if their method is good, it isn’t valuable if it’s not procedurally debatable – they don’t get access to any of their offense 18 -B. The best solutions are formed with critical contestation from multiple sides – it’s more likely we make a good liberation strategy if both debaters can engage and test it 19 -C. Debate is about process not content – we inevitably switch sides, even if it’s arguing against one method with another. The individual ideas we learn, like __, aren’t as valuable as learning how to effectively apply those ideas outside of round by engaging in precise discussions instead of just asserting opinions. 20 -D. They force the NEG to extremist generics – this is why cap and anthro are such common responses to their position - which causes more evasion than if we had a substantive debate about the topic. 21 -E. It’s key to long term activism which turns case and outweighs because of existential threats. Lundberg 10 22 -Christian O. Lundberg 10 Professor of Communications @ University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, “Tradition of Debate in North Carolina” in Navigating Opportunity: Policy Debate in the 21st Century By Allan D. Louden, p. 311 23 - 24 -The second major... increasingly complex world. 25 - 26 - 27 -2. Procedural Fairness - Non topical advocacies mean they can defend anything outside the resolution which is unpredictable, and also defend uncontestable offense like racism bad. This kills NEG ground and thus equal access to the ballot. 28 - 29 -This is an independent voting issue which outweighs: 30 - 31 -A. Evaluation – even if their arguments seem true, that’s only because they already had an advantage – fairness is a meta constraint on your ability to determine who best meets their ROB. 32 -B. Fairness is key to effective dialogue. Galloway 07 33 -Ryan, “DINNER AND CONVERSATION AT THE ARGUMENTATIVE TABLE: RECONCEPTUALIZING DEBATE AS AN ARGUMENTATIVE DIALOGUE”, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28 (2007) 34 - 35 -Debate as a... of topical advocacy. 36 - 37 -C. Links best to the role of the judge to determine the winner as per the ballot – that’s impossible if the round’s unfair. Even if their method is good for education there’s no reason you vote on it, just as even if exercise is good for soccer players you don’t vote for the team that ran most. 38 - 39 -3. We solve all their offense - 40 - 41 -A. All arguments are framework - we don’t have the power to impose a norm, only to persuade you that their arguments should be rejected. Anderson 6 42 -Amanda Anderson, Caroline Donovan Professor of English Literature and Department Chair at Johns Hopkins University, Senior Fellow at the School of Criticism and Theory at Cornell University, holds a Ph.D. in English from Cornell University, 2006 (“Reply to My Critic(s),” Criticism, Volume 48, Number 2, Spring, Available Online to Subscribing Institutions via Project MUSE, p. 285-287) 43 - 44 -Let's first examine... further elaboration here. 45 - 46 - 47 -B. T version of the AFF solves all your offense - 48 - 49 -C. They can read these arguments on the NEG, there’s no reason affirming is key – switch side debate is key to tolerance instead of dogmatism. Muir 93: 50 -Department of Communications at George Mason (Star A., “A Defense of the Ethics of Contemporary Debate,” Philosophy and Rhetoric, Vol. 26, No. 4. Gale Academic Onefile) 51 - 52 -Values clarification, Stewart... gain such insight. 53 - 54 -Outweighs: unwillingness to listen to other viewpoints is the root cause of their harms. 55 - 56 -Voter: Drop the debater on T – the round is already skewed from the beginning because their advocacy excluded by ability to generate NC offense– letting them sever doesn’t solve any of the abuse 57 - 58 -Theory is an issue of competing interpretations because reasonability invites arbitrary judge intervention based on preference rather than argumentation and encourages a race to the bottom in which debaters will exploit a judge’s tolerance for questionable argumentation. 59 - 60 -No RVIs on T: They shouldn’t win for simply proving they’re topical, that just means they’ve met their burden. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-03-05 16:54:49.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Aron Berger - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Chaminade RA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -63 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard Westlake Enge Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - T - Framework - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -USC
- Caselist.CitesClass[55]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,31 +1,0 @@ 1 -Capitalism is the root cause of racism – a politics of difference mediated through identity focus servers class consciousness and divides the working class. McLaren et al., 4 – Distinguished Professor, Critical Studies, Chapman University (Peter and Valerie Scatamburlo-D’Annibale, “Class Dismissed? Historical materialism and the politics of ‘difference’,” Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 36, No. 2, April, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.proxy.lib.umich.edu/doi/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.00060.x/full)// JJN from file 2 - 3 -For example, E. San Juan... that confront us. 4 - 5 -We will isolate several links to the affirmative – 6 - 7 -1. The central question of this debate is whose politics best creates a radical break with capitalism—the 1AC’s archeological investigation of a particular instance of violence reduces capitalism to just one of a set of antagonisms and causes endless subdivision of political demands which dangerously distracts from revolutionary politics proper—this round is a question of starting points—the perm can never be truly radical because the 1AC’s particular focus has always already ceded the universal. Bjerre and Lausten ’10 8 -Henrik Jøker Bjerre is Assistant Professor at the Department of Philosophy and History of Ideas, Aarhus University, Denmark. His main research interests are moral philosophy, sociology and psychoa - nalysis. His publications include Kantian Deeds (Continuum, 2010). Carsten Bagge Laustsen is Associate Professor at the Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Denmark. His main research interests are terrorism, political theology, political thought and modern social theory. He has previously published The Culture of Exception. Sociology Facing the Camp (Routledge, 2005, with Bülent Diken) and Sociology through the Projector (Routledge, 2008, with Bülent Diken). Humanities Insights : The Subject of Politics : Slavoj Žižek’s Political Philosophy. Penrith, GBR: Humanities-Ebooks, LLP, 2010. p 96-99. Copyright © 2010. Humanities-Ebooks, LLP. All rights reserved. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/wayne/Doc?id=10567330andppg=20, accessed via e-book @ Wayne State, online, jj 9 - 10 -If we focus... lose their significance. 11 - 12 -Sticking strictly to identity performance sustains ideology- they refuse to take the potentially dangerous step outside of themselves but prefer to stick to non controversial positions- this makes their performance apolitical and hollow. The idea of personalizing debate and revealing an aspect of yourself is precisely what we should be resisting 13 -Zizek 9, senior researcher at the Institute for Sociology and Philosophy, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, international director of the Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities and a professor of philosophy and psychoanalysis at the European Graduate School (Slavoj, First As Tragedy Then as Farce, p.37-40) 14 - 15 -Human, All Too... a dispassionate eye. 16 - 17 -(continued) 18 -Zizek 9, senior researcher at the Institute for Sociology and Philosophy, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, international director of the Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities and a professor of philosophy and psychoanalysis at the European Graduate School 19 -(Slavoj, First As Tragedy Then as Farce, p.44-5) 20 - 21 -We should fearlessly... of the people. 22 - 23 -And the K outweighs - neoliberalism causes extinction and massive social inequalities -Farbod 15 24 - ( Faramarz Farbod , PhD Candidate @ Rutgers, Prof @ Moravian College, Monthly Review, http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2015/farbod020615.html, 6-2) 25 - 26 -Global capitalism is... of no return. 27 - 28 -The alternative is recommitment to class struggle grounded in socialism. McLaren 04 29 -Peter Mclaren 4, Education and Urban Schooling Division prof, UCLA—and Valerie Scatamburlo-D'Annibale; University of Windsor, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2004, www.freireproject.org/articles/node2065/RCGS/class_dismissed-val-peter.10.pdf. NS from file 30 - 31 -These are the... to be redeemed. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-03-05 17:06:37.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Aron Berger - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Chaminade RA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -64 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard Westlake Enge Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - K - Cap v Identity Politics - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -USC
- Caselist.CitesClass[56]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,35 +1,0 @@ 1 -Interp: The affirmative must disclose the plan text and advantage area if they break new at the toc when pairings are released. Or at coin flip 2 - 3 - 4 -Standard – 5 - 6 -1. Clash – having no idea what the debate will be about makes being neg impossible – the aff gets plan text choice and infinite prep to craft the most strategic case. No disclosure makes this impossible to overcome b/c it means the neg only gets 4 mins of prep to answer a strategy that the AFF had 5 months to prep. 7 - 8 -And, they’ll say generics, but their model of debate means the neg has no time to cut an update to their generics specific to the AFF and we’ll lose every debate. 9 - 10 -2. Discourages tricks – plan text disclosure discourages cheap shot aff’s. It’s the toc – if the aff isn’t inherent or easily defeated by 20 minutes of research, the case should lose. They had 5 months – the neg is entitled to some research time to make sure the AFF is inherent, topical, and controversial. Otherwise bad AFF’s can win on purely surprise factor, which is a bad model b/c it encourages finding the most fringe surprising case possible instead of a well researched and defensible aff. 11 - 12 -Vote on substantive engagement: otherwise we’re speaking without debating and there’s nothing to separate us from dueling oratory. It also creates the most valuable long-term skills since we need to learn how to defend our beliefs in any context, like politics. 13 - 14 -Drop the debater on new affs: Their lack of disclosure makes substance irreparable b/c our entire argument is that we did not have a basis to engage the aff to begin with. 15 - 16 -Competing interps since reasonability invites arbitrary judge intervention based on preference rather than argumentation and encourages a race to the bottom in which debaters exploit a judge’s tolerance for questionable argumentation. 17 - 18 -No RVIs: 19 - 20 - A. They incentivize debaters to go all in in theory and bait it with abusive practices, killing substantive clash on other flows. B. They can run theory on me too if I’m unfair so 1) theory is reciprocal because we’re both able to check abuse and 2) also cures time skew because they can collapse in the 2ar to their shell. 21 - 22 -Or 23 - 24 -Interpretation: AFF’s breaking new must disclose the advocacy text and advantage areas when pairings are released or at coin flip 25 - 26 -The standard is clash – new aff’s make negating impossible b/c we don’t know what the debate is going to be about which neutralizes pre round prep and forces the neg to beat an aff they had 5 months to prep and frontline with 4 minutes of prep. This makes negating impossible b/c they’ll have prepped all the generics we can read. 27 - 28 -Whole res doesn’t solve – advantage area is just as important as the plan text b/c how counterplans solve the case, specific case responses, answers to framing all require an idea of what the AFF is going to be about. The neg is entitled to 15 minutes of research against an AFF they had infinite prep to get ready to make sure we don’t lose on purely surprise factor. 29 - 30 -Vote on substantive engagement - : otherwise we’re speaking without debating and there’s nothing to separate us from dueling oratory. It also creates the most valuable long-term skills since we need to learn how to defend our beliefs in any context, like politics. 31 -Drop the debater on new affs: Their lack of disclosure makes substance irreparable b/c our entire argument is that we did not have a basis to engage the aff to begin with. 32 - 33 -Competing interps since reasonability invites arbitrary judge intervention based on preference rather than argumentation and encourages a race to the bottom in which debaters exploit a judge’s tolerance for questionable argumentation. 34 - 35 -No RVIs: They incentivize debaters to go all in in theory and bait it with abusive practices, killing substantive clash on other flows - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-29 11:38:48.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -No Man Can Judge Me - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -65 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard Westlake Enge Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - Theory - Must Disclose New Affs - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -TOC
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -https://hsld 16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Loyola%20Invitational-Round1.docx1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Loyola%20Invitational-Round1.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -https://hsld 16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Greenhill%20RR-Round2.docx1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Greenhill%20RR-Round2.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -https://hsld 16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Greenhill%20RR-Round2.docx1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Greenhill%20RR-Round2.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[37]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -https://hsld 16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Glenbrooks-Round2.docx1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Glenbrooks-Round2.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[39]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -https://hsld 16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Glenbrooks-Round5.docx1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Glenbrooks-Round5.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[41]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -https://hsld 16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Glenbrooks-Quarters.docx1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Glenbrooks-Quarters.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[42]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -https://hsld 16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-CPS-Round2.docx1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-CPS-Round2.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[43]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -https://hsld 16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-CPS-Round4.docx1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-CPS-Round4.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[46]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -https://hsld 16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-CPS-Round6.docx1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-CPS-Round6.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[47]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -https://hsld 16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-CPS-Octas.docx1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-CPS-Octas.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[48]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -https://hsld 16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-HW%20Round%20Robin-Round3.docx1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-HW%20Round%20Robin-Round3.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[49]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -https://hsld 16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-HW%20Round%20Robin-Round1.docx1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-HW%20Round%20Robin-Round1.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[50]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -https://hsld 16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-HW%20Round%20Robin-Round6.docx1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-HW%20Round%20Robin-Round6.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[51]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -https://hsld 16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-HW%20RR-Quarters.docx1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-HW%20RR-Quarters.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[52]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -https://hsld 16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-HW%20Round%20Robin-Semis.docx1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-HW%20Round%20Robin-Semis.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[54]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -https://hsld 16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Emory-Round3.docx1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Emory-Round3.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[55]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -https://hsld16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Emory-Round6.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[56]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -48 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-18 21:33:33.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Tim Alderete - OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -https://hsld16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Berkeley-Round1.docx - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harker KS - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -The Aff affirmed freedom of speech in order to speak out against government securitization of the war on terror - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Berkeley
- Caselist.RoundClass[57]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -49 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-19 17:20:14.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Sunhee Simon - OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -https://hsld16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Berkeley-Round4.docx - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Loyola GR - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Berkeley
- Caselist.RoundClass[58]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -50 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-19 17:22:02.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Sunhee Simon - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Loyola GR - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Berkeley
- Caselist.RoundClass[60]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -51 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-20 05:09:54.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Jack Coyle - OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -https://hsld16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Berkeley-Round6.docx - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Palo Alto FZ - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -6 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -The neg was read against a burden's aff with a lengthy underview - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Berkeley
- Caselist.RoundClass[61]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -52 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-20 20:57:08.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Panel - OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -https://hsld16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-Berkeley-Doubles.docx - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Immaculate Heart DD - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Doubles - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Berkeley
- Caselist.RoundClass[62]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -53 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-03-05 16:23:28.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Adam Torson - OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -https://hsld16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-USC-Round6.docx - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -PV Peninsula JL - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -6 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -USC
- Caselist.RoundClass[63]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -54 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-03-05 16:54:47.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Aron Berger - OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -https://hsld16.debatecoaches.org/download/Harvard+Westlake/Enge+Neg/Harvard%20Westlake-Enge-Neg-USC-Round2.docx - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Chaminade RA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -USC
- Caselist.RoundClass[64]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -55 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-03-05 17:06:35.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Aron Berger - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Chaminade RA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -USC
- Caselist.RoundClass[65]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -56 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-29 11:38:46.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -No Man Can Judge Me - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -TOC