| ... |
... |
@@ -1,86
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-Chronicle AC |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-Part 1: Framing |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
-Free speech is a pre-requisite to any rational moral system- without it self-realization is impossible. Eberle 94 |
| 6 |
|
-Eberle, Law @ Roger Williams, 94 (Wake Forest LR, Winter) |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
-The Court's decision... be vigilantly investigated. |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
-Free speech facilitates the development of moral reasoning- restrictions should be prima facie rejected. Dwyer 01 |
| 11 |
|
-(Susan, Phil@Maryland, Nordic Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 2, No. 2 ® Philosophia Press 2001) |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-Direct Nonconsequentialism Let... (protect) it everywhere. |
| 14 |
|
- |
| 15 |
|
-Consequentially, Free speech is a gateway to every other impact. D’Souza 96 |
| 16 |
|
-(Frances, Prof. Anthropology Oxford, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/hearings/19960425/droi/freedom_en.htm?textMode=on) |
| 17 |
|
- |
| 18 |
|
-In the absence... at every turn. |
| 19 |
|
- |
| 20 |
|
-Plan Text: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict constitutionally protected journalist speech. |
| 21 |
|
- |
| 22 |
|
-Advantage 1: Stop The Press |
| 23 |
|
- |
| 24 |
|
-Censorship of student journalism is increasing at the worst possible time. Censorship discourages questioning the government. Schuman 12-8 |
| 25 |
|
-(Rebecca, http://www.slate.com/articles/life/education/2016/12/student_journalists_are_under_threat.html) |
| 26 |
|
- |
| 27 |
|
-Well, here’s some... censorship is acceptable. |
| 28 |
|
- |
| 29 |
|
-The legal justification for newspaper censorship is a 7th circuit decision that applied Hazelwood to universities-this allows unchecked arbitrary censorship by administrators. Goodman 05 |
| 30 |
|
-( S. Mark Goodman, Michael C. Hiestand, Student Press Law Center 2005 WL 2736314 (U.S.) (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) Supreme Court of the United States. Margaret L. HOSTY, Jeni S. Porche, and Steven P. Barba, Petitioners, v. Patricia CARTER, Respondent. No. 05-377. October 20, 2005. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Brief of Amici Curiae Student Press Law Center, Associated Collegiate Press, College Media Advisers, Community College Journalism Association, Society for Collegiate Journalists, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, American Society of Newspaper Editors, National Newspaper Association, Newspaper Association of America, Society of Professional Journalists, Associated Press Managing Editors, College Newspaper Business and Advertising Managers, National Federation of Press Women, National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association and the Independent Press Association/Campus Journalism Project in Support of Petition of Margaret L. Hosty, Jeni S. Porche, and Steven P. Barba for Writ of Certiorari Of Counsel: S. Mark Goodman, Michael C. Hiestand, Student Press Law Center, 1101 Wilson Blvd., Ste 1100, Arlington, VA 22209-2211, (703) 807-1904. Richard M. Goehler, (Counsel of Record), Frost Brown Todd LLC, 2200 PNC Center, 201 East Fifth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, (513) 651-6800, Counsel for Amici Curiae.) |
| 31 |
|
- |
| 32 |
|
-In contrast to... legacy of Hazelwood. |
| 33 |
|
- |
| 34 |
|
-Regulation of newspapers is a crucial precedent used to justify widespread campus censorship-it uniquely empowers and protects administrators to censor. Lukianoff 05 |
| 35 |
|
-(George, Samantha Harris, Foundation for Individual, Rights in Education, 2005 WL 2736313 (U.S.) (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) Supreme Court of the United States. Margaret L. HOSTY et al., Petitioners, v. Patricia CARTER, Respondent. No. 05-377. October 19, 2005. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Brief Amici Curiae of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education; The Coalition for Student and Academic Rights; Feminists for Free Expression; The First Amendment Project; Ifeminists.Net; National Association of Scholars; Accuracy in Academia; Leadership Institute; The Individual Rights Foundation; The American Council of Trustees and Alumni; and Students for Academic Freedom in Support of Petitioners) |
| 36 |
|
- |
| 37 |
|
-Commentators from across... it is lost.”20 |
| 38 |
|
- |
| 39 |
|
-Universities are the most important site of first amendment activity- ignore negative evidence written about other contexts. Goodman 2 |
| 40 |
|
-( S. Mark Goodman, Michael C. Hiestand, Student Press Law Center 2005 WL 2736314 (U.S.) (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) Supreme Court of the United States. Margaret L. HOSTY, Jeni S. Porche, and Steven P. Barba, Petitioners, v. Patricia CARTER, Respondent. No. 05-377. October 20, 2005. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Brief of Amici Curiae Student Press Law Center, Associated Collegiate Press, College Media Advisers, Community College Journalism Association, Society for Collegiate Journalists, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, American Society of Newspaper Editors, National Newspaper Association, Newspaper Association of America, Society of Professional Journalists, Associated Press Managing Editors, College Newspaper Business and Advertising Managers, National Federation of Press Women, National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association and the Independent Press Association/Campus Journalism Project in Support of Petition of Margaret L. Hosty, Jeni S. Porche, and Steven P. Barba for Writ of Certiorari Of Counsel: S. Mark Goodman, Michael C. Hiestand, Student Press Law Center, 1101 Wilson Blvd., Ste 1100, Arlington, VA 22209-2211, (703) 807-1904. Richard M. Goehler, (Counsel of Record), Frost Brown Todd LLC, 2200 PNC Center, 201 East Fifth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, (513) 651-6800, Counsel for Amici Curiae.) |
| 41 |
|
- |
| 42 |
|
-The University is... and university campuses. |
| 43 |
|
- |
| 44 |
|
-Campus free speech preserves a free and productive society. Lukianoff 2 |
| 45 |
|
-(George, Samantha Harris, Foundation for Individual, Rights in Education, 2005 WL 2736313 (U.S.) (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) Supreme Court of the United States. Margaret L. HOSTY et al., Petitioners, v. Patricia CARTER, Respondent. No. 05-377. October 19, 2005. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Brief Amici Curiae of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education; The Coalition for Student and Academic Rights; Feminists for Free Expression; The First Amendment Project; Ifeminists.Net; National Association of Scholars; Accuracy in Academia; Leadership Institute; The Individual Rights Foundation; The American Council of Trustees and Alumni; and Students for Academic Freedom in Support of Petitioners) |
| 46 |
|
- |
| 47 |
|
-This Court has... ‘conventions of decency.’ ”). |
| 48 |
|
- |
| 49 |
|
-Advantage 2: Civic Engagement |
| 50 |
|
- |
| 51 |
|
-Censorship of college journalism guts civic engagement. LoMonte 12-1 |
| 52 |
|
-(Frank D., http://www.splc.org/article/2016/12/college-media-threats-report-2016) |
| 53 |
|
- |
| 54 |
|
-Frank D. LoMonte, executive... always be guaranteed.” |
| 55 |
|
- |
| 56 |
|
- |
| 57 |
|
-Civic engagement is the vital internal link to solving every existential problem- its try or die for the affirmative. Small 06 |
| 58 |
|
-(Jonathan, former Americorps VISTA for the Human Services Coalition, “Moving Forward,” The Journal for Civic Commitment, Spring, http://www.mc.maricopa.edu/other/engagement/Journal/Issue7/Small.jsp) |
| 59 |
|
- |
| 60 |
|
-What will be... do just that. |
| 61 |
|
- |
| 62 |
|
-Trump victory proves the case is a disad to every K- failure to prioritize civic engagement causes rightwing takeover. Rorty 98 |
| 63 |
|
-(Richard, Stanford Philosophy Professor, Achieving Our Country, pp. 87-94) |
| 64 |
|
- |
| 65 |
|
-If the formation... a resourceful spook."10 |
| 66 |
|
- |
| 67 |
|
-Underview |
| 68 |
|
- |
| 69 |
|
-We need to embrace the state as a heuristic - all of their reasons the state is bad prove uniqueness for my argument – debate can be a tool where we truly sharpen the tools of the master. Coverstone 5 |
| 70 |
|
-MBA (Alan, Acting on Activism, http://home.montgomerybell.edu/~coversa/Acting20on20Activism20(Nov2017-2005).doc) |
| 71 |
|
- |
| 72 |
|
-An important concern... in America today. |
| 73 |
|
- |
| 74 |
|
-The state is inevitable - we need to understand how the state works to re-appropriate it. Koopman 08 |
| 75 |
|
-Koopman, 8- Sarah Koopman (Ph.D., political geography) is a feminist political geographer who does collaborative research with international solidarity movements to support their efforts to decolonize the relationships between global North and South. Her work also speaks to dynamics in humanitarianism, development, and peacebuilding more generally.(“Imperialism Within: Can the Master’s Tools Bring Down Empire?”, http://www.acme-journal.org/vol7/SKo.pdf?q=within) |
| 76 |
|
- |
| 77 |
|
-Those of us... the master’s house. |
| 78 |
|
- |
| 79 |
|
-Empirics prove free speech is empowering and an effective tool to fight discrimination on campus’. Strossen, Former President of the ACLU, 2k |
| 80 |
|
-Strossen, Nadine. "Incitement to hatred: Should there be a limit." S. Ill. ULJ 25 (2000): 243. CC |
| 81 |
|
- |
| 82 |
|
-B. A Counterspeech Strategy... it enfeebles them.4 |
| 83 |
|
- |
| 84 |
|
-AND AFF gets RVIs – |
| 85 |
|
-1. AFF flex – neg has the ability to collapse to either layer so aff needs the same ability for the 2AR – this outweighs. A. 2NR collapse – time skew becomes 6-1 since I cover multiple layers, which makes it impossible to win B. 1AR is too short to read theory compared to the neg so AFF needs each layer to be reciprocal rather than adding more unreciprocal avenues |
| 86 |
|
-2. Only neg can read T because only AFF has a T burden so since aff can’t reciprocally respond they need the RVI to compensate for neg’s unique avenue to the ballot. |