Changes for page Harvard Westlake Enge Aff
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:36
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (2 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[3]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-11-19 17:06:27. 1341 +2016-11-19 17:06:27.0
- Caselist.RoundClass[4]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-11-19 17:07:23. 2001 +2016-11-19 17:07:23.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[3]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,98 @@ 1 +Framing 2 +The standard is preserving the rule of law 3 + 4 +First, the rule of law animates democracy- its crucial to rights protections and reducing all forms of violence 5 +Rummel 91 – Professor of Political Science @ University of Hawaii R.J. Rummel, THE RULE OF LAW:TOWARDS ELIMINATING WAR AND DEMOCIDE, S peech given to the ABA National Security Conference on "The Rule of Law in United States Foreign Policy and the New World Order. Washington, D.C., October 10-11, 1991. pg. http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/ABA.SPEECH.HTM 6 + 7 +Obviously we are... toward universal democracy. 8 + 9 +Second, Rule of law is a gateway to every disad impact. Rhyne 58 10 +RHYNE 1958 – FORMER PRESIDENT AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION 11 +LAW DAY SPEECH, VOICE OF AMERICA, http://www.abanet.org/publiced/lawday/rhyne58.html) 12 + 13 +The rule of... and lasting peace. 14 + 15 + 16 +Harms 17 + 18 +SCOTUS ruled in Saucier V Katz that a duplicative “double reasonableness” standard must be applied in 4th amendment cases. This has disrupted the balance of immunity jurisprudence tilting the playing field overwhelmingly in favor of police gutting section 1983 and civil rights protections broadly 19 +Brown, JD, 03 20 +(Peter A., - Qualified Immunity Illogically Applies to Excessive Force Claims Suffolk University Law Review 2003 36 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 607 ) 21 + 22 +In Saucier v. Katz, the... vindicate constitutional violations. 23 + 24 +The 4th amendment already provides broad protection for police conduct-Saucier goes too far in protecting police at the expense of civil rights through duplicative legal sleight of hand 25 +Shapiro, JD, et al, 01 26 +(Steven R. Shapiro American Civil Liberties Union Foundation 125 Broad Street New York, New York 10004 (212) 549-2500 Alan L. Schlosser American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Northern California 1663 Mission Street San Francisco, California 94103 (415) 621-2488 William Goodman Center for Constitutional Rights 666 Broadway New York, New York 10012 (212) 614-6464 David Rudovsky (Counsel of Record) 924 Cherry Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 (215) 925-4400 Michael Avery Suffolk Law School 41 Temple Street Boston, Massachusetts 02114 (617) 573-8551 Ruth E. Harlow Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund 120 Wall Street, Suite 1500 New York, New York 10005 (212) 809-8585 2001 WL 173522 (U.S.) (Appellate Brief) United States Supreme Court Amicus Brief. Donald SAUCIER, Petitioner, v. Elliot M. KATZ and In Defense of Animals, Respondents. No. 99-1977. October Term, 2000. February 16, 2001. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) 27 + 28 +The qualified immunity... force was excessive. 29 + 30 +Double reasonableness warp the rule of law in favor of police defendants 31 +Hassel, Law @ Roger Williams, 09 32 +(Diana, JD Rutgers, Excessive Reasonableness The Trustees of Indiana University Indiana Law Review 2009 Indiana Law Review 43 Ind. L. Rev. 117) 33 + 34 +Operating on two... into one inquiry. n59 35 + 36 +1983 is crucial to the rule of law- it’s the lynchpin of rights protections 37 +Pittman, JD candidate, 12 38 +(Nathan R., UNINTENTIONAL LEVELS OF FORCE IN § 1983 EXCESSIVE FORCE CLAIMS William and Mary Law Review William and Mary Law Review May, 2012 William and Mary Law Review 53 Wm. and Mary L. Rev. 2107) 39 + 40 +The evolution of... protect constitutional rights. 41 + 42 +Successful civil rights challenges to police misconduct are crucial to challenging cultural militarism. Carter 14 43 +Tom Carter – WSWS Legal Correspondent, a lawyer (https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/02/24/cart-f24.html). “US Supreme Court Expands Immunity for Killer Cops.” Center for Research on Globalization. November 12, 2015. http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-supreme-court-expands-immunity-for-killer-cops/5488366 JJN 44 + 45 +When a civil... working class opposition. 46 + 47 + 48 +Independent of civil rights protections an incoherent, government biased QI system undercuts law enforcement and the rule of law broadly 49 +Pittman, JD candidate, 12 50 +(Nathan R., UNINTENTIONAL LEVELS OF FORCE IN § 1983 EXCESSIVE FORCE CLAIMS William and Mary Law Review William and Mary Law Review May, 2012 William and Mary Law Review 53 Wm. and Mary L. Rev. 2107) 51 + 52 +Qualified immunity has... an impoverished doctrine. n161 53 + 54 + 55 +Solvency 56 + 57 +Plan Text: The Supreme Court ought to limit qualified immunity in excessive force cases 58 + 59 +The plan strikes a goldilocks middle ground by eliminating massive pro police bias in existing immunity jurisprudence 60 +Stoelting, JD and co-chair of the International Criminal Law Committee, 89 61 +(David P, QUALIFIED IMMUNITY FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS IN SECTION 1983 EXCESSIVE FORCE CASES 1989 University of Cincinnati Law Review. University of Cincinnati 1989 58 U. Cin. L. Rev. 243) 62 + 63 +Although the Court... of constitutional rights. 64 + 65 +QI is the key barrier- counterplans don’t solve the case 66 +Hassel, Law @ Roger Williams, 09 67 +(Diana, JD Rutgers, Excessive Reasonableness The Trustees of Indiana University Indiana Law Review 2009 Indiana Law Review 43 Ind. L. Rev. 117) 68 + 69 +Meanwhile, far removed... deter police violence. 70 + 71 +The aff is key to meaningful challenges to police conduct and legitimacy of the rule of law 72 +Hassel, Law @ Roger Williams, 09 73 +(Diana, JD Rutgers, Excessive Reasonableness The Trustees of Indiana University Indiana Law Review 2009 Indiana Law Review 43 Ind. L. Rev. 117) 74 + 75 +Over the past... give it meaning. 76 + 77 + 78 +Underview 79 + 80 +Apply a strict filter to all negative arguments- if they aren’t 81 +A. About the use of excessive force 82 +B. Based on legal reasoning other than Anderson V. Creighton 83 +Then their evidence comes from inaccurate and incoherent legal scholarship and should be ignored 84 +Shapiro, JD, et al, 01 85 +(Steven R. Shapiro American Civil Liberties Union Foundation 125 Broad Street New York, New York 10004 (212) 549-2500 Alan L. Schlosser American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Northern California 1663 Mission Street San Francisco, California 94103 (415) 621-2488 William Goodman Center for Constitutional Rights 666 Broadway New York, New York 10012 (212) 614-6464 David Rudovsky (Counsel of Record) 924 Cherry Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 (215) 925-4400 Michael Avery Suffolk Law School 41 Temple Street Boston, Massachusetts 02114 (617) 573-8551 Ruth E. Harlow Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund 120 Wall Street, Suite 1500 New York, New York 10005 (212) 809-8585 2001 WL 173522 (U.S.) (Appellate Brief) United States Supreme Court Amicus Brief. Donald SAUCIER, Petitioner, v. Elliot M. KATZ and In Defense of Animals, Respondents. No. 99-1977. October Term, 2000. February 16, 2001. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) 86 + 87 +In the rare... qualified immunity defense. 88 + 89 + 90 +Err aff- consensus of experts agree 91 +Pittman, JD candidate, 12 92 +(Nathan R., UNINTENTIONAL LEVELS OF FORCE IN § 1983 EXCESSIVE FORCE CLAIMS William and Mary Law Review William and Mary Law Review May, 2012 William and Mary Law Review 53 Wm. and Mary L. Rev. 2107) 93 + 94 +The qualified immunity... its reasonableness standard. 95 + 96 +AND AFF gets RVIs – 97 +1. AFF flex – neg has the ability to collapse to either layer so aff needs the same ability for the 2AR – this outweighs. A. 2NR collapse – time skew becomes 6-1 since I cover multiple layers, which makes it impossible to win B. 1AR is too short to read theory compared to the neg so AFF needs each layer to be reciprocal rather than adding more unreciprocal avenues 98 +2. Only neg can read T because only AFF has a T burden so since aff can’t reciprocally respond they need the RVI to compensate for neg’s unique avenue to the ballot. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-19 17:07:24.481 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Akhil Gandra - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lakeville South KS - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard Westlake Enge Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Democracy AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Glenbrooks