| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,43 @@ |
|
1 |
+===1NC – T=== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+====A. Interp: The aff must defend that no public colleges or universities in the United States restrict any constitutionally protected speech. To clarify, they can't specify a school or certain kind of school. ==== |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+====Counterplans that say all public colleges or universities except for one restrict any constitutionally protected speech are theoretically illegitimate.==== |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+====Generic nouns such as "colleges" without an article are the most common type of generalization, used in all contexts of writing and speech. Byrd ==== |
|
11 |
+**"Generic Meaning," Georgia State University, Transcript of lecture given by Pat Byrd (Department of Applied Linguistics and ESL). ** |
|
12 |
+Douglas Biber and Susan Conrad, two of the authors of the Longman Grammar, |
|
13 |
+AND |
|
14 |
+2. Zero + noncount: Life has been changed by the computer. |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+====Determining semantics comes before other standards:==== |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+====A. It's the only stasis point we know before the round so it controls the internal link to engagement, and there's no way to use ground if debaters aren't prepared to defend it. B. Grammar is the most objective since it doesn't rely on arbitrary determinants of what constitutes the best type of debate – it's the only impact you can evaluate. C. The AFF isn't topical regardless of fairness or education since it doesn't affirm the text - we wouldn't debate rehab again just because it was a good topic. ==== |
|
21 |
+B. Violation: They specify military academies |
|
22 |
+C. Standards: |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+====1. Limits: They allow way too many affs. Trade schools, Culinary schools, military academies, law schools and literally thousands more. Selingo 15==== |
|
26 |
+**Jeffrey J. Sellingo, How many colleges and universities do we really need?, The Washington Post, July 20 2015 EE** |
|
27 |
+Today, there are some 5,300 colleges and universities in the United States |
|
28 |
+AND |
|
29 |
+, high debt loads for students, and poor placement rates into jobs. |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+ |
|
32 |
+====That explodes neg prep burden and predictability which kills fairness and engagement. Procedurally, if I can't access their education it doesn't matter. T version of the AFF solves their offense – they can read advantages in any topic area which ensures NEG responses.==== |
|
33 |
+ |
|
34 |
+ |
|
35 |
+====2. Core Controversy: They shift the topic from core issues like hate speech and coddling to militarism good/bad which kills access to generics and gives them an arbitrary prep advantage. We're better off having nuanced discussion about the topic then shallow ones about _____ in their aff. ==== |
|
36 |
+ |
|
37 |
+ |
|
38 |
+====D. Vote on substantive engagement: otherwise we're speaking without debating and there's nothing to separate us from dueling oratory. It also creates the most valuable long-term skills since we need to learn how to defend our beliefs in any context, like politics.==== |
|
39 |
+Drop the debater on T: |
|
40 |
+A. Hold them accountable for their interp – a topical advocacy frames the debate - drop the arg lets them jump ship to a new layer killing NEG ground. |
|
41 |
+B. Drop the arg on T is the same thing as drop the debater |
|
42 |
+AND |
|
43 |
+cures time skew because they can collapse in the 2ar to their shell. |