Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[44]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[44]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,53 +1,0 @@
1		-===1NC – K===
2		-
3		-
4		-====Rhetoric propagating free speech as the answer to social ills directly trades off with our ability to fight injustice. Free speech is a tool that courts wield in colorblind ways against people. Delgado and Stefancic '92====
5		-Richard Delgado - Charles Inglis Thomson Professor of Law, University of Colorado. J.D., U. California-Berkeley, 1974. and Jean Stefancic - Technical Services Librarian, University of San Francisco School of Law. M.L.S., Simmons College, 1963; M.A., University of San Francisco, 1989. "IMAGES OF THE OUTSIDER IN AMERICAN LAW AND CULTURE: CAN FREE EXPRESSION REMEDY SYSTEMIC SOCIAL ILLS?" Cornell Law Review. September 1992. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3571andcontext=clr JJN
6		-III. How THE SYSTEM OF FREE EXPRESSION SOMETIMES MAKES MATTERS WORSE Speech and free
7		-AND
8		-this system of oppression is appealing, lofty, romantic-and wrong.
9		-
10		-
11		-====And, more speech is not better – speech tends to reinscribe power relations rather than break them down. Delgado and Yun '94====
12		-Richard Delgado - Charles Inglis Thomson Professor of Law, University of Colorado. J.D. 1974, University of California, Berkeley. David H. Yun – Member of the Colorado Bar. J.D. 1993, University of Colorado. "Pressure Valves and Bloodied Chickens: An Analysis of Paternalistic Objections to Hate Speech Regulation." California Law Review. 1994. http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1712andcontext=californialawreview JJN
13		-D. "More Speech"-Talking Back to the Aggressor as a Preferable Solution
14		-AND
15		-already charged with their own education, be responsible constantly for educating others?
16		-
17		-
18		-====Turns the case – hate speech does real violence to people of color and necessarily locks in relationships of domination. Delgado and Stefacic '09====
19		-Richard Delgado - University Professor, Seattle University School of Law; J.D., 1974, University of California, Berkeley. Jean Stefancic – Research Professor, Seattle University School of Law; M.A., 1989, University of San Francisco. "FOUR OBSERVATIONS ABOUT HATE SPEECH." WAKE FOREST LAW REVIEW. 2009. http://wakeforestlawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Delgado_LawReview_01.09.pdf
20		-II. OBSERVATION NUMBER TWO: THE EVALUATION OF HARMS HAS BEEN INCOMPLETE One way
21		-AND
22		-at odds with the underlying rationales of a system of free expression.111
23		-
24		-
25		-====Anti-Blackness is the root cause of white supremacy and social oppression. It outweighs the case. Heitzeg 15====
26		-**Heitzeg, Nancy A ~~a Professor of Sociology and Director of the interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Race/Ethnicity Program at St. Catherine University, St. Paul, MN.~~. "On The Occasion Of The 50th Anniversary Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964: Persistent White Supremacy, Relentless Anti-Blackness, And The Limits Of The Law." Hamline J. Pub. L. and Pol'y 36 (2015): 54.**
27		-While all communities of color suffer from racism in general and its manifestation in
28		-AND
29		-creates an outsider status that makes future inclusion a daunting challenge.22
30		-
31		-
32		-====The alternative is to embrace the demand of abolitionism – we must recognize that whiteness operates subtly through hands-off policies that preserve the status quo. We choose to challenge the university system at the grassroots intersection with other liberation movements. Oparah 14====
33		-**Oparah, Julia. ~~Professor and Chair of Ethnic Studies at Mills College and a founding member of Black Women Birthing Justice~~ "Challenging Complicity: The Neoliberal University and the Prison–Industrial Complex." The Imperial University: Academic Repression and Scholarly Dissent (2014).**
34		- In my earlier work on the academic-prison-industrial complex, I
35		-AND
36		-faculty? These are the possibilities opened up by academic-MPIC abolition.
37		-
38		-
39		-====The role of the ballot is to interrogate the scholarship of the AFF. This makes the passage of the plan irrelevant since fiat is illusory, so they should not get to weigh the case. ====
40		-
41		-
42		-====First, their refusal of minority voices is a conscious choice. Delgado 84====
43		-**Delgado, Richard. "The imperial scholar: Reflections on a review of civil rights literature." University of Pennsylvania Law Review 132.3 (1984): 561-578.**
44		-It does not matter where one enters this universe; one comes to the
45		-AND
46		-in other fields of law seem to confront no such tradition.23
47		-
48		-
49		-====Second, a focus on political action assumes a kind of democratic liberalism that is inaccessible to marginalized voices. Refuse their demand for concrete state action. Lopez 03====
50		-**López, Gerardo R. ~~University of Utah, Salt Lake City~~ "The (racially neutral) politics of education: A critical race theory perspective." Educational Administration Quarterly 39.1 (2003): 68-94.**
51		-Unfortunately, the vast majority of tactics and mechanisms privileged in the field emerge
52		-AND
53		-that contextual factors do not matter in the larger social and political arena.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2017-02-18 17:41:18.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-DeLateur, Korsakov, Torson

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Nueva AK

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-37

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Doubles

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Harvard Westlake Chaudhary Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-JAN-FEB CRT K

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Golden Desert