Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[42]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[43]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[42]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-02-04 23:54:05.147
	1	+2017-02-04 23:54:05.0

Caselist.CitesClass[43]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,23 @@
	1	+====The standard is minimizing existential Risk====
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+====Epistemic modesty breaks any tie and answers all AC pre-empts ====
	5	+Nick Bostrom, Existential Risk Prevention as a Global Priority, 2012. NS
	6	+These reflections on moral uncertainty suggest an alternative, complementary way of looking at existential
	7	+AND
	8	+to increase the probability that the future will contain a lot of value.
	9	+
	10	+
	11	+====Extinction justifies moral loopholes ====
	12	+**Bok, 1988 (**Sissela Bok, Professor of Philosophy, Brandeis, Applied Ethics and Ethical Theory, Ed. David Rosenthal and Fudlou Shehadi, 1988)
	13	+The same argument can be made for Kant's other formulations of the Categorical Imperative:
	14	+AND
	15	+even killing an innocent person, in order that the world not perish.
	16	+
	17	+
	18	+====Disregarding foreseeable harm reifies structures of domination====
	19	+McCluskey 12 – JSD @ Columbia, Professor of Law @ SUNY-Buffalo
	20	+(Martha, "How the "Unintended Consequences" Story Promotes Unjust Intent and Impact," Berkeley La Raza, doi: dx.doi.org/doi:10.15779/Z381664)
	21	+By similarly making structures of inequality appear beyond the reach of law reform, the
	22	+AND
	23	+losses to so many of us seem natural, inevitable, and beneficial.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-02-04 23:54:05.936

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Scott Nielson

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Isidore Newman EP

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+36

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harvard Westlake Chaudhary Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JAN-FEB Util NC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Golden Desert