| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,23 @@ |
|
1 |
+A. Text |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Countries/the aff actor ought to expand regulation of nuclear-related environmental injustice. This entails: |
|
4 |
+A mandating increased public education campaigns about nuclear radiation; |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+B requiring nuclear corporations to increase stakeholder participation in siting discussions; and |
|
7 |
+C creating a 100-mile radius between reactors and inhabited areas. |
|
8 |
+B. Competition |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+The CP is mutually exclusive with the aff, since “prohibit” means: |
|
11 |
+(“forbid”, dictionary.com, BE) |
|
12 |
+ to forbid (an action, activity, etc.) by authority or law. |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+The aff must defend forbidding NP production of nuclear power, but the CP allows it, so any perm is severance from the aff. |
|
16 |
+C. Solvency |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+The CP solves the entire aff by reducing environmental injustice without banning the NP we need to stop warming. |
|
19 |
+Cousins notes: Cousins, Elicia Researcher, Carleton College, Claire Karban, Fay Li, and Marianna Zapanta. “Nuclear Power and Environmental Justice.” Carleton College, Environmental Studies Comprehensive Project, no date. RP |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+From a Rawlsian |
|
22 |
+AND |
|
23 |
+nuclear power regulation. |