| ... |
... |
@@ -1,16
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-A. Text |
| 2 |
|
-The United States OR aff actor ought to maintain qualified immunity for police officers, but establish a system of vicarious liability that lets citizens sue police departments instead of individual officers. |
| 3 |
|
-Goode 1: Goode, M.R. Assistant Professor of Law at Dalhousie University, Canada “The Imposition of Vicarious Liability to the Torts of Police Officers: Considerations of Policy.” Melbourne University Law Review, Volume 10, May 1975. RP |
| 4 |
|
-The English Royal |
| 5 |
|
-AND |
| 6 |
|
-the police authority. |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
-B. Competition |
| 9 |
|
-CP competes through net benefits. |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-C. Solvency |
| 12 |
|
-CP creates institutional change |
| 13 |
|
-Goode 2: Goode, M.R. Assistant Professor of Law at Dalhousie University, Canada “The Imposition of Vicarious Liability to the Torts of Police Officers: Considerations of Policy.” Melbourne University Law Review, Volume 10, May 1975. RP |
| 14 |
|
-Deterrence in tort |
| 15 |
|
-AND |
| 16 |
|
-the tort action. |