Changes for page Harrison Zinman Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:35
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-09-18 15:05:38. 9451 +2016-09-18 15:05:38.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[4]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,26 @@ 1 +A Interpretation: The Aff must defend hypothetical enactment of the resolution by a government body. 2 + 3 +This does not require the use of any particular style or type of evidence — only that the topic and a government policy should determine the debate’s subject matter. 4 + 5 +Prohibit is a legal action 6 +Blacks Law Dictionary: Blacks Law Dictionary “Prohibit” The Law Dictionary. RP 7 + 8 +Restraining a certain action (s) by a certain party, normally by the order of a legitimate legal authority. 9 + 10 +B Violation: 11 + 12 +C Net Benefits: 13 + 14 +1. Extemp 15 + 16 +2. Ground and Limits 17 +Nebel: Nebel, Jake Owner and Contributor, VBriefly “The Priority of Resolutional Semantics” VBriefly. December 2014. RP 18 +There is an 19 +AND 20 +avoids these problems. 21 + 22 +3. Deliberation 23 +Steinberg and Freeley 13, David, Lecturer in Communicatio22n studies and rhetoric. Advisor to Miami Urban Debate League. Director of Debate at U Miami, Former President of CEDA. And ** Austin, attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, JD, Suffolk University, Argumentation and Debate, Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 121-4 24 +Debate is a 25 +AND 26 +the following discussion. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-09-18 15:05:39.836 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +- - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +- - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harrison Zinman Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +SEPTOCT - Policy FW - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +SEPTOCT