| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,22 @@ |
|
1 |
+====The 1AC’s inscribing of identity is deeply invested in a politics of ressentiment, a moralizing drive for revenge, that claims righteousness from suffering.==== |
|
2 |
+Dina Georgis 8 M.A. (Philosophy of Education, OISE); Ph.D. (Women’s Studies, York University), “Moving Past Ressentiment: War and the State of Feminist Freedom”, TOPIA 20 109, 2008, BE |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+What are the |
|
5 |
+AND |
|
6 |
+production in general. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+====This ressentiment re-inscribes suffering by defining identity merely as a reaction to something outside of it and insisting on guilt in response to oppression—this identity is life-denying and is invested in its own subjection.==== |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+Wendy Brown 93 professor of Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley where she is also affiliated with the Department of Rhetoric, and where she is a core faculty member in Critical Theory, “Wounded Attachments”, Political Theory, Vol. 21, No. 3 (Aug., 1993), pp. 390-410, BE |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+However, it is |
|
13 |
+AND |
|
14 |
+"hostile external world."25 |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+====Their politicized identity is attached to its own exclusion—the alternative is to understand the subject as part of an ongoing genealogy of desire, rather than a sovereign or conclusive “I”. This transition breaks down the ideology of ressentiment by situating the subject historically and not purely reactively.==== |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+Wendy Brown 93 professor of Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley where she is also affiliated with the Department of Rhetoric, and where she is a core faculty member in Critical Theory, “Wounded Attachments”, Political Theory, Vol. 21, No. 3 (Aug., 1993), pp. 390-410, BE |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+Of course, Zarathustra's |
|
21 |
+AND |
|
22 |
+ an alternative future? |