| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,36 @@ |
|
1 |
+====1 Their rejection of content warnings starts from a standpoint of privilege – they assume all people are equal==== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Holmes: Holmes, Lindsay Contributor, The Huffington Post “A Quick Lesson On What Trigger Warnings Actually Do.” The Huffington Post. August 2016. RP |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+“You will find |
|
7 |
+AND |
|
8 |
+ additional psychological trauma. |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+====2 Their reps put faith in professors to decide what’s best for students==== |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+Chemaly: Chemaly, Soraya Contributor, The Huffington Post “What’s Really Important About ‘Trigger Warnings’.” The Huffington Post. May 2014. RP |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+The first objection |
|
16 |
+AND |
|
17 |
+the degree |
|
18 |
+====The alternative – reject the Affs totalizing condemnation of content warnings as an acknowledgment of privilege – content warnings can be used in good ways.==== |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+Chemaly: Chemaly, Soraya Contributor, The Huffington Post “What’s Really Important About ‘Trigger Warnings’.” The Huffington Post. May 2014. RP |
|
21 |
+ |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+Another way of |
|
24 |
+ AND |
|
25 |
+ a good thing. |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+ |
|
28 |
+====That’s a voting issue – question the reps of the Aff prior to the passage of the plan – they do not get to weigh the case ==== |
|
29 |
+ |
|
30 |
+==== |
|
31 |
+Reps shape reality. ==== |
|
32 |
+Hardy and Palmer: Hardy and Palmer 98, Cynthia Hardy Dept of Management @ UMelbourne and Ian Palmer School of Management and Business at University of Tech @ Sydney, “Discourse as a Strategic Resource”, Number 12, December 1998, BE |
|
33 |
+ |
|
34 |
+We draw explicitly |
|
35 |
+AND |
|
36 |
+ material social structures” (Fairclough, 1992, p. 66). |