| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,32 @@ |
|
1 |
+====A Interpretation: “Colleges” is a generic bare plural noun phrase that refers to colleges in general. The aff may not defend that a subset of colleges or universities in the United States ought not restrict constitutionally protected free speech.==== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Jake Nebel 14 let’s be real you know who he is, “Jake Nebel on Specifying “Just Governments””, VBriefly, 19 Dec 2014, BE |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+I believe that |
|
6 |
+AND |
|
7 |
+a few governments. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+====B Violation:==== |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+====C Net Benefit:==== |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+====1 Common usage – our interp is key to how ordinary speakers would view the topic==== |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+Jake Nebel 14 let’s be real you know who he is, “Jake Nebel on Specifying “Just Governments””, VBriefly, 19 Dec 2014, BE |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+To my ear, |
|
18 |
+AND |
|
19 |
+ agree with it. |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+====Semantics are a voter and outweighs—it’s ridiculous to expect us to prepare for things outside of the topic.==== |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+Nebel 15 - (Jake Marshall Scholar of Philosophy, Princeton University "The Priority of Resolutional Semantics" http://vbriefly.com/2015/02/20/the-priority-of-resolutional-semantics-by-jake-nebel/) GHS//GB |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+One reason why |
|
26 |
+AND |
|
27 |
+ the argument above. |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+====2 Limits – there are nearly 1700 colleges in the US ~-~- their interp is RIDICULOUS. They can defend any college– FSU, Michigan, Westchester Community College, UC Berkeley, and literlaly thousands of others. Solvency advocates don’t check – any random school newspaper about free speech can count as a solvency advocate.==== |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+ |
|
32 |
+====D Voting issue==== |