| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,23 @@ |
|
1 |
+====1 Debate shouldn’t center on util, since it inherently excludes minority debaters.==== |
|
2 |
+Vincent 1: Vincent, Christopher. Debate Coach “Re-Conceptualizing Our Performances: Accountability In Lincoln Douglas Debate” Victory Briefs, 2013. RP |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+Charles Mills argues |
|
5 |
+AND |
|
6 |
+to our communities. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+====2 Traditional risk calculus dismisses persons of color - they are not included in “the greatest good for the greatest number”.==== |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+Mayes 15 Van Cleve and Mayes ’15 Spring 2015. Nicole Gonzalez Van Cleve is an Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice at Temple University with courtesy appointments in the Department of Sociology and the Beasley School of Law. She received her PhD in Sociology from Northwestern University and served as Research Director for Chicago Appleseed Fund for Justice. She is a recipient of the 2014-2015 Ford Foundation Fellowship Postdoctoral Award and a Visiting Scholar at the American Bar Foundation. Lauren Mayes is a doctoral student in the Department of Criminal Justice at Temple University. “Criminal Justice Through "Colorblind" Lenses: A Call to Examine the Mutual Constitution of Race and Criminal Justice” 40 Law and Soc. Inquiry 406. Lexis |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+We first examine |
|
14 |
+AND |
|
15 |
+ of racial discrimination. |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+====Discourse in round matters —you are an educator and this is a teachable moment—if you endorse her speech act, endorse all of it==== |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+Vincent 13 – (Christopher Debate Coach, former college NDT debater “Re-Conceptualizing Our Performances: Accountability In Lincoln Douglas Debate” |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+Charles Mills argues |
|
22 |
+AND |
|
23 |
+ community could have. |