Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[0]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[0]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,65 +1,0 @@
1		-A Interpretation: The Aff must defend hypothetical enactment of the resolution by a government body.
2		-
3		-This does not require the use of any particular style or type of evidence — only that the topic and a government policy should determine the debate’s subject matter.
4		-
5		-Prohibit is a legal action
6		-Blacks Law Dictionary: Blacks Law Dictionary “Prohibit” The Law Dictionary. RP
7		-
8		-restraining a certain
9		-AND
10		- legitimate legal authority.
11		-
12		-
13		-B Violation:
14		-
15		-
16		-C Net Benefits
17		-FIRST IS DELIBERATION ~-~- Debate requires a specific point of difference in order to promote effective exchange—stasis and limits are key to engagement.
18		-
19		-Steinberg and Freeley 13, David, Lecturer in Communicatio22n studies and rhetoric. Advisor to Miami Urban Debate League. Director of Debate at U Miami, Former President of CEDA. And ** Austin, attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, JD, Suffolk University, Argumentation and Debate, Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 121-4
20		-
21		-Debate is a
22		-AND
23		-the following discussion.
24		-
25		-The impact outweighs— deliberative debate models impart skills vital to respond to social problems
26		-
27		-Christian O. Lundberg 10 Professor of Communications @ University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, “Tradition of Debate in North Carolina” in Navigating Opportunity: Policy Debate in the 21st Century By Allan D. Louden, p. 311
28		-
29		-The second major
30		-AND
31		- the foreseen future.
32		-
33		-SECOND IS EFFECTIVE DIALOGUE – Topicality is key to respect and engagement – link turns inclusivity
34		-Galloway 7: Galloway 7—Samford Comm prof (Ryan, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28, 2007)
35		-Debate as a
36		-AND
37		-of topical advocacy.
38		-
39		-
40		-
41		-THIRD IS JURISDICTION – the topic is a predefined issue we discuss – key to democracy and inclusion
42		-
43		-Nebel: Nebel, Jake Owner and Contributor, VBriefly “The Priority of Resolutional Semantics” VBriefly. December 2014. RP
44		-
45		-
46		-Another deontological argument
47		-AND
48		-the chosen resolution.
49		-
50		-Jurisdiction outweighs – even if they win their interp is better for debate you still negate because it’s outside of the judges obligation
51		-
52		-Nebel writes: Nebel, Jake Owner and Contributor, VBriefly “The Priority of Resolutional Semantics” VBriefly. December 2014. RP
53		-
54		- A second strategy
55		-AND
56		- to your opponent.
57		-
58		-
59		-
60		-
61		-
62		-
63		-
64		-
65		-D Fairness is a voter

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-09 23:19:45.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Charlie Blatt

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Lexington AA

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-0

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Harrison Piliero Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-SEPTOCT - A New Wall

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Byram Invitational