| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,32 @@ |
|
1 |
+====A Interpretation: The Aff must defend allowing all constitutionally protected speech on campus – they may not specify a subset of speech to not protect.==== |
|
2 |
+====The negative “any” is an indefinite that refers to all==== |
|
3 |
+Cambridge Dictionary: Cambridge Dictionary, Any, http://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/quantifiers/any. |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+We use any |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+AND |
|
8 |
+eaten them all. |
|
9 |
+====B Violation==== |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+====C Net Benefits==== |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+====1 Precision Semantics outweigh everything else==== |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+Nebel 15 - (Jake Marshall Scholar of Philosophy, Princeton University "The Priority of Resolutional Semantics" http://vbriefly.com/2015/02/20/the-priority-of-resolutional-semantics-by-jake-nebel/) GHS//GB |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+One reason why |
|
19 |
+AND |
|
20 |
+the argument above. |
|
21 |
+ |
|
22 |
+====2 Legal context – tons of court rulings have established “any” as “all”.==== |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+Elder: Elder (David S. Elder, October 1991, "Any and All": To Use Or Not To Use?” "Plain Language' is a regular feature of the Michigan Bar Journal, edited by Joseph Kimble for the State Bar Plain English Committee. Assistant editor is George H. Hathaway, |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+The Michigan Supreme |
|
27 |
+AND |
|
28 |
+Accident Ass'n, supra) |
|
29 |
+ |
|
30 |
+3 Limits |
|
31 |
+ |
|
32 |
+D Voting issue |