Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[67]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[114]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[67]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-06 04:32:45.45
	1	+2017-01-06 04:32:45.0

Caselist.CitesClass[114]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,44 @@
	1	+====A Interpretation: The Aff must defend implementation of the resolution by colleges and universities====
	2	+====Public colleges are institutions of learning that are funded by governments.====
	3	+USLegal: USLegal Site that defines legal terms “Public College Law and Legal Definition.” USLegal. RP
	4	+
	5	+Public college means
	6	+AND
	7	+a governmental source.”(42 USCS § 2000c)
	8	+
	9	+====B. Violation====
	10	+
	11	+
	12	+====C. Net Benefits====
	13	+====FIRST IS GROUND AND LIMITS – topicality draws a clear line in the sand – otherwise AFFs can defend anything and arbitrarily decide their own ground – they can defend racism being bad as the advocacy, Baudrillard, DNG, fem, or anything else – this is a qualitative and quantitative skew since they can defend anything====
	14	+
	15	+====SECOND IS DELIBERATION ~-~- Debate requires a specific point of difference in order to promote effective exchange—stasis and limits are key to engagement.====
	16	+Steinberg and Freeley 13, * David, Lecturer in Communicatio22n studies and rhetoric. Advisor to Miami Urban Debate League. Director of Debate at U Miami, Former President of CEDA. And ** Austin, attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, JD, Suffolk University, Argumentation and Debate, Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 121-4
	17	+Debate is a
	18	+AND
	19	+the following discussion.
	20	+
	21	+====The impact outweighs— deliberative debate models impart skills vital to respond to social problems====
	22	+
	23	+Christian O. Lundberg 10 Professor of Communications @ University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, “Tradition of Debate in North Carolina” in Navigating Opportunity: Policy Debate in the 21st Century By Allan D. Louden, p. 311
	24	+
	25	+The second major
	26	+AND
	27	+the foreseen future.
	28	+
	29	+====THIRD IS PRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES – Realizing any end to address patriarchy requires interaction with the state – their anti-state stance is catastrophically hyperbolic and actively undercuts substantive gains for women in need====
	30	+
	31	+Mansbridge 3– Professor of Political Leadership and Democratic Values @ Harvard (Jane, “Anti-statism and Difference Feminism in International Social Movements,” International Feminist Journal of Politics)
	32	+
	33	+Feminist strategies that
	34	+AND
	35	+is required reading.
	36	+
	37	+
	38	+
	39	+
	40	+====D The voter is substantive engagement. Impact framing – this outweighs their offense====
	41	+
	42	+1 It controls the direction of all of their links
	43	+
	44	+2 Debate is the only forum for public advocacy, so discussing substantive propositions is important to ensure we can learn real skills

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-01-06 04:32:47.702

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Preetham Chippada, Shagun Kukreja

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Stuyvesant KF

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+67

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harrison Piliero Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JANFEB - The Phantom Wall

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Newark Round Robin