Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[18]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[18]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,55 +1,0 @@
1		-A Interpretation: The Aff must defend hypothetical enactment of the resolution by a government body.
2		-
3		-This does not require the use of any particular style or type of evidence — only that the topic and a government policy should determine the debate’s subject matter.
4		-
5		-Prohibit is a legal action
6		-Blacks Law Dictionary: Blacks Law Dictionary “Prohibit” The Law Dictionary. RP
7		-
8		-restraining a certain
9		-AND
10		- legitimate legal authority.
11		-
12		-B Violation:
13		-
14		-C Net Benefits
15		-FIRST IS DELIBERATION ~-~- Debate requires a specific point of difference in order to promote effective exchange—stasis and limits are key to engagement.
16		-
17		-Steinberg and Freeley 13, David, Lecturer in Communicatio22n studies and rhetoric. Advisor to Miami Urban Debate League. Director of Debate at U Miami, Former President of CEDA. And Austin, attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, JD, Suffolk University, Argumentation and Debate, Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 121-4
18		-
19		-Debate is a
20		-AND
21		-the following discussion.
22		-
23		-The impact outweighs— deliberative debate models impart skills vital to respond to social problems
24		-
25		-Christian O. Lundberg 10 Professor of Communications @ University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, “Tradition of Debate in North Carolina” in Navigating Opportunity: Policy Debate in the 21st Century By Allan D. Louden, p. 311
26		-
27		-The second major
28		-AND
29		- the foreseen future.
30		-
31		-SECOND IS EFFECTIVE DIALOGUE – Topicality is key to respect and engagement – link turns inclusivity
32		-Galloway 7: Galloway 7—Samford Comm prof (Ryan, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28, 2007)
33		-Debate as a
34		-AND
35		-of topical advocacy.
36		-
37		-THIRD IS JURISDICTION – the topic is a predefined issue we discuss – key to democracy and inclusion
38		-
39		-Nebel: Nebel, Jake Owner and Contributor, VBriefly “The Priority of Resolutional Semantics” VBriefly. December 2014. RP
40		-
41		-Another deontological argument
42		-AND
43		-the chosen resolution.
44		-
45		-Jurisdiction outweighs – even if they win their interp is better for debate you still negate because it’s outside of the judges obligation
46		-
47		-Nebel writes: Nebel, Jake Owner and Contributor, VBriefly “The Priority of Resolutional Semantics” VBriefly. December 2014. RP
48		-
49		- A second strategy
50		-AND
51		- to your opponent.
52		-
53		-
54		-
55		-D Fairness is a voter

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-11 13:06:00.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Charlie Blatt

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Lexington AA

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-13

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Harrison Piliero Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-SEPTOCT - A New Wall

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Byram Invitational