Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[61]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[61]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,13 +1,0 @@
1		-A. Interpretation: The Aff may not normatively justify their framework, theoretically justify their framework, and read a single country plan.
2		-
3		-A. Interpretation: The Aff may not say the neg burden is to prove there's no obligation to future people, but that proving nuclear power good isn't offense
4		-
5		-A. Interpretation: The aff may not say the neg must concede to the burden if they also say the neg may not have multiple routes to the ballot
6		-
7		-A. Interpretation: The Aff may not justify their framework both theoretically and normatively
8		-
9		-A. Interpretation: The Aff may not say the neg must quantify all abuse against side bias, and also read spikes with offensive implications in the AC
10		-
11		-A. Interpretation: The Aff must concede that the neg can respond to spikes when extended in the 2NR
12		-
13		-A. Interpretation: The Aff must only justify their framework normatively and may not justify it by appealing to topic specificity. To clarify, no theoretically justified frameworks.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-10-19 14:22:01.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		--

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		--

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-37

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Harrison Piliero Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-0 - Broken Interps

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-September October