| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,16 @@ |
|
1 |
+====A Interpretation: Debaters must, on the page with their name and the school they attend, disclose all taglines, full citations, and the first and last three words of the pieces of evidence read in their cases on the NDCA wiki at least one hour before the round if they have read that case before.==== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+====B Violation:==== |
|
4 |
+====C Net Benefits:==== |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+====1 Research – disclosure increases research and gets rid of anti-educational arguments because debaters are forced to prepare cases knowing that people will have answers AND people get the opportunity to research answers to disclosed cases.==== |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+Nails 13 - (Jacob I am a policy debater at Georgia State University. I debated LD for 4 years for Starr's Mill High School (GA) and graduated in 2012. "A Defense of Disclosure (Including Third-Party Disclosure)" http://nsdupdate.com/2013/a-defense-of-disclosure-including-third-party-disclosure-by-jacob-nails/) GHS//GB |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+I fall squarely |
|
11 |
+AND |
|
12 |
+incentivize better debating. |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+====2 Clash – Disclosure is the best method for increasing clash in debates because it allows debaters to substantively engage positions rather than relying on sketchy tricks to avoid the discussion. It also allows for more specific clash because debaters can see specific arguments disclosed instead of trying to link generic arguments in.==== |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+D Voting issue |