Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[57]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[97]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[57]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-12-03 02:35:58.52
	1	+2016-12-03 02:35:58.0

Caselist.CitesClass[97]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,48 @@
	1	+====A Interpretation: The AFF must defend hypothetical enactment of the resolution by a government body.====
	2	+====‘Resolved’ denotes a proposal to be enacted by law====
	3	+Words and Phrases 64 Permanent Edition
	4	+Definition of the
	5	+AND
	6	+establish by law”.
	7	+
	8	+====B. Violation====
	9	+
	10	+
	11	+====C. Net Benefits====
	12	+====FIRST IS GROUND – topicality draws a clear line in the sand – otherwise AFFs can defend anything and arbitrarily decide their own ground.====
	13	+
	14	+Nebel writes: Nebel, Jake Owner and Contributor, VBriefly “The Priority of Resolutional Semantics” VBriefly. December 2014. RP
	15	+
	16	+There is an
	17	+AND
	18	+avoids these problems.
	19	+
	20	+====SECOND IS DELIBERATION ~-~- Debate requires a specific point of difference in order to promote effective exchange—stasis and limits are key to engagement.====
	21	+
	22	+Steinberg and Freeley 13, * David, Lecturer in Communicatio22n studies and rhetoric. Advisor to Miami Urban Debate League. Director of Debate at U Miami, Former President of CEDA. And ** Austin, attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, JD, Suffolk University, Argumentation and Debate, Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 121-4
	23	+Debate is a
	24	+AND
	25	+the following discussion.
	26	+
	27	+====The impact outweighs— deliberative debate models impart skills vital to respond to social problems====
	28	+
	29	+Christian O. Lundberg 10 Professor of Communications @ University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, “Tradition of Debate in North Carolina” in Navigating Opportunity: Policy Debate in the 21st Century By Allan D. Louden, p. 311
	30	+
	31	+The second major
	32	+AND
	33	+the foreseen future.
	34	+
	35	+
	36	+====THIRD IS TOPIC EDUCATION – qualified immunity needs to be discussed through a quantitative, policy based lens.====
	37	+
	38	+Armstrong: Armstrong, Melissa Professor of Law, Columbia University “Rule pragmatism: Theory and application to qualified immunity analysis.” 2004. RP
	39	+
	40	+Section 1983 of
	41	+AND
	42	+ of the doctrine.
	43	+====FOURTH IS LIBERATORY ADVOCACY – breaking down racism begins through informed activism====
	44	+Bouie 13: staff writer at The American Prospect, Making and Dismantling Racism. Prospect. 2013. RP
	45	+
	46	+Over at The
	47	+AND
	48	+the same way.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-12-03 02:36:01.133

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Talia Coyne

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Randolph AP

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+57

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harrison Piliero Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+NOVDEC - Return of the Wall

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Princeton Invitational